Paparazzi All Over Shiloh's Every Move

46. This is for the poster who said that Jolie and Pitt sold pictures of their baby for profit! Did you not READ that they gave the entire amount of money to HELP CHILDREN!!!!! They did not keep ANY of that money for themselves!!!!! You apparently have a lot of hate and jealousy towards Jolie and Pitt who do so much good for this world's children when almost no one else does. And where do you get off saying they are whining...about ANYTHING!!? They are the LEAST likely of any celebrities to whine. How you can compare them to the immature Spears is beyond me!

Posted at 9:11AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Linda

47. This is for the poster who said that Jolie and Pitt sold pictures of their baby for profit! Did you not READ that they gave the entire amount of money to HELP CHILDREN!!!!! They did not keep ANY of that money for themselves!!!!! You apparently have a lot of hate and jealousy towards Jolie and Pitt who do so much good for this world's children when almost no one else does. And where do you get off saying they are whining...about ANYTHING!!? They are the LEAST likely of any celebrities to whine. How you can compare them to the immature Spears is beyond me!

Posted at 9:11AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Linda

48. Thats a damn shame. That the paparazzi cannot leave The Jolie-Pitts alone.The paparazzi are way out of line. I may envy the celebrities their money, but I sure do not envy them their (lack of) lives.

Posted at 9:29AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Shae

49. I feel sad for the family, they should be able to walk out of thier home with thier kids and not have the flashses going off all over. I pray that the press and papparazzi will give them the respect and privacy they deserve as human beings. We all have that God given right, why not them?

PS As for Britney, she deserves the same and I do feel bad for her. She is doing her best as a young mother in the soptlight.
I will pray for them all.

Posted at 9:58AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Joy

50. they are a beautiful family they need time to adjust and will give pictures then. they deserve private time just like everyone else God bless them

Posted at 10:36AM on Jun 17th 2006 by sandy davis

51. I AGREE, THEY WERE ALWAYS SEEN WITH THE OTHER KIDS EVER WHERE. I WONDER IF THERE HAS BEEN DEATH THREATS? WHY ELSE SO

Posted at 10:47AM on Jun 17th 2006 by REGINA MARTIN

52. The reason they are going to such lengths with Shiloh is because she is under one month old. Angelina obviously adopted the other two when they were much older. When a child is that young, they need to be shielded from too much noise, light, and commotion. Doctors sometimes refer to the first three months of a child's life as The Fourth Trimester. I think what they're doing is wise. Can you imagine bombarding a newborn with flashing cameras and shouting people? That is why. Please remember that while they have earned their cash thanks to these flashing bulbs, they are still real people, and that much commotion could really upset and un-nerve a newborn child. Imagine doing that to a newborn you have known...

Posted at 10:48AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Malia

53. I know it would have to drive you nuts to have cameras in your face 24/7 but it also doesn't hurt that you make millions to do what they do. But here's my theory..I would put money on the fact that the hiding is do to PEOPLE magazine. The deal they struck for pics of Shiloh at such a hefty cost probably states that for a certain amount of time (probably till this baby issue leaves the news stands) they have to hide her to protect the exclusivness of their photos...thats just my guess. But I also know that I would shield a newborn to because all noise and lights flickering would scare the daylights out of a baby.

Posted at 11:12AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Meredith

54. Whats the matter Brad and Angie, you afraid that if you let the world see Shiloh (who by the way is obviously more important then their adopted children, they didn't hide them away.) we might actually see that you all are no better at parenting then anyone else? I do believe it is sad that you say you have all this love for all your children but for some reason this one is clearly standing out as a favorite. Get a clue, the more pictures they take the less money they will get.

Posted at 11:25AM on Jun 17th 2006 by so bored with the brangelina thing.

55. Whats the matter Brad and Angie, you afraid that if you let the world
see Shiloh (who by the way is obviously more important then their
adopted children, they didn't hide them away.) we might actually see
that you all are no better at parenting then anyone else? I do
believe it is sad that you say you have all this love for all your
children but for some reason this one is clearly standing out as a
favorite. Get a clue, the more pictures they take the less money they
will get....... I realize your both wonderful for all you give to the third world countries, but really don't you think the children of the United States could use some, if not all of your good fortune? Look around your own backyard, we are just as devastating here if you'd open your eyes, and there are certainly enough children here who need adopted as anywhere else. (Probably just not as much publicity or satisfaction for you though.)

Posted at 11:29AM on Jun 17th 2006 by so bored with the brangelina thing.

56. Stop buying publications with their pictures in it, stop reading anything about Brad and Angelina and guess what the papparazzi will go away.

Posted at 11:32AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Starr

57. All this fuss over one more kid in the world seems a little over-blown to me ....In the real world this is nothing but a rich home wrecking woman who had sex with a rich guy who cheats on his wife, they destroyed his marriage, and the end result...they have an illegitimate kid together... whoopy ... It happens all the time .... They're trash no matter how you look at it and the huge amount of money they have doesnt change a thing...

Posted at 11:36AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Brandi

58. If the reason you are hiding Shiloh from the flashing and all the noise, well then more power to you, just remember could have been easily avoided by keeping her inside until she was old enough like the other two children were. Not like if she needed a checkup you couldn't have had the doctor come to her. TomKat has and Brooke Shields have been able to manage it, I am sure if you wanted to, you could manage also.. Sorry to leave negative comments, I do realize it is rude. For some reason the whole Brangelina thing rubs me the wrong way and I don't feel as accepting of you two as a couple as I would someone else, probably just the whole way it was represented by the press and your unwillingness to set us right if it really wasn't as immoral as represented. I am sure your wonderful parents, so god bless you on that count!!!

Posted at 11:41AM on Jun 17th 2006 by so bored with the brangelina thing.

59. Ooops! One more rude and uncalled for comment.. for some reason I am soooooooooooo not bored with the Vaughniston thing. Could be the class factor they are using. Other than that,I really do wish the best to the Children you two have brought into your home. Adopting and loving other children as much as your biological children is truly truly a beautiful thing, so I will always give anyone credit for that.

Posted at 11:49AM on Jun 17th 2006 by so bored with the brangelina thing.

60. The media and papparazzi need to let the family alone. They have put their family together with the adoption of the two older children and the new one and need to be let alone. As far as being good parents, I believe that they probably are, but they will never really be real good parents until Angelina lets go of the hatred she has towards her father. He is the kids grandfather, rather she likes it or not! It is time that she let the hatred towards him go. There is two sides to every story and she really needs to learn what his was! I think what she has done in Africa and other humanitarian things is great, but until she resolves this issue within herself, she still has a flaw! You only have one biological father!

Posted at 11:51AM on Jun 17th 2006 by Mary Swehla