Hasselhoff Denies He Brutalized Wife

16. Just because he's good looking, charming and famous doesn't make him an angel. The jerk probably did it. No one would have believed who abused me as a child either. On the other hand his Mrs. surely played her part. Show biz marriages! Phooey!

Posted at 9:12AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Sharon

17. I doubt he is telling the truth, and am sure she is..why would anyone go to such trouble and detail to make those things up..there is enough detail in there to believe her..all he says..no didn't do it..sorry David, get some help.

Posted at 9:23AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Tracy

18. Michael, divorce may be a two way street but sometimes all the traffic is going in one direction....

Posted at 9:25AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Been there

19. i think famous people should be allowed to smack their wives and children

Posted at 9:32AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by chris

20. i think famous people should be allowed to smack their wives and children

Posted at 9:32AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by chris

21. I've been through divorce where a lot of ugly things were said and not true at all. So we need to sit back and wait before we Judge David and believe everything his soon to be ex says. Evidence is the key, is there any? If he pushed her and broke her nose where are the police reports? With body guards about, someone would have witnessed these things. People say all kinds of evil things to win a custody battle because it is scary giving up control of the kids you cherish most in life. So lets cut David a break until we REALLY know the truth, which will come out eventually. Betcha the accusations will dissppear in time. Lets not call him a woman beater just yet. SIt for a bit and watch the story fallapart. Then again it it turns out the be true in the end, justice will prevail for her.

Posted at 9:45AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by karen

22. Men who brutalize women are the worst sort of cowards and need a serious ass beating themselves. I just had to toss out a man I loved more than air b/c he physically attacked me. I'm 5 months pregnant.
I hope she takes him for everything he's got. Too bad for me my ex has nothing to take.

Posted at 9:47AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Stacy

23.
David H is a recovering alcoholic.

Posted at 11:00AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Lauren

24. Did he or didn't he? We don't know right now. What I find interesting is the automatic assumption that he did. I am not saying I believe him or her here, I just know the automatic response is "He did it". Keep in mind she was willing to give him joint custody of the children. If she felt strong enough to file the abuse allegations in the divorce procedings, then why let him have that? We assume the guilt because he is famous and we love to see the famous fall.

If he did it, then by God let him go down. I suggest letting Pam Anderson beat him slowly to death with her in-out-in implants. Entertaining and deadly. If he didn't do it? Sorry, David, you're screwed. The public assumes you did no matter what.

Posted at 11:09AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by LusiphurMalache

25. Sounds like another "she said - he said" case in which we have no reason to believe one person over the other without corroberating facts. Did she go to an ER when her nose was allegedly broken. Is she trolling for money using the "I'm a victim" approach? As for never hitting a woman, I would never initiate a fight, but if a woman punches me, I'm going to defend myself by punching her back. There are plenty of vicious women out there -- just ask any ER or pediatric nurse or watch "nannycam" videos.

Posted at 11:28AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Johni Thomas

26. Having been through a couple of bad marriages myself I can empathize, however I could never condone a man hitting a woman, even if they deserve it. I used to be so infatuated with David, but if these allegations are true, the respect for this man went completely out the door....of course if he's been indoctrinated into the world of too much money, fame, drugs and so on and so on...then he needs to take a long hard look at his life and makethe determination of what is important in his life. He may physically and verbally abuse his wife (allegedly), but is this why he chose her? And is she the innocent victim in this scenario? Or did she provoke the incidents? If not, then why is she staying with him? Common sense would say "get away from the abuse", or does she stay for the money?

Posted at 11:36AM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Karla M. Phillips

27. i don't think anyone should be jumping to conclusions about them until the truth comes out because the truth always comes out. i think they should take a lie detector test to see who is telling the truth and isn't.

Posted at 12:44PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by hayley

28. There is always 2 sides to a divorce case. too bad we are only hearing one side.

Posted at 12:25AM on Aug 5th 2006 by c. short

29. Dang David H.
Seems you have some much money, "had" great looks and now look what you have become. Hitting your wife and calling names, but the person who said divorce is a two way street was right. My husband says there are:
Three sides to every story, his side, her side and THE TRUTH

Posted at 6:52PM on Aug 12th 2006 by Sharon A. Holmes