Brangelina Guilts Hollywood Into Giving

Paris Hilton / Angelina JolieIt's the Brangelina charity effect.

Thanks to the media mileage Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have wrung out of their Africa charity work, celebrities today are falling over themselves to show the world how public spirited they are.

Latest example: Nicole Kidman, who spent the days before her wedding to crooner Keith Urban visiting Sydney's Children's Hospital with her own kids. The happy couple is reportedly asking guests to donate to charity rather then buy gifts.

In addition, Cher in recent days has drummed up money for troop helmets in Iraq, while K-Fed has thrown his substantial celebrity weight behind the fate of ... pennies.

While the new round of celeb heart pouring is an outgrowth of Brangelina's work in Africa, other celebs have been big in the free-money circuit for years. Big donators include: Oprah Winfrey, who gave $52 million in 2005 to charity; Sandra Bullock, who donated $1 million twice, once to the Red Cross following 9/11 and the second to Tsunami Relief; and Paul Newman, who has donated nearly $200 million in after-tax profits of his "Newmans Own" products. There's also Bono who, in our opinion, should be reaching sainthood by the end of the week.

Then there's Paris Hilton, who somehow seems not to have received the charity memo.

Our favorite socialite was recently accused of leaving an Australian children's charity high and dry. Paris reportedly pledged to organize a star-studded benefit concert in Los Angeles to benefit Paradise Kids. The charity claims Paris said she would have friends Backstreet Boys and Blu Cantrell perform, and at one point even Missy Elliott's name was mentioned. So far, two years have passed and Paris has yet to return with the big-name acts. We called Paris' rep and he said he was researching the matter. At press time had not gotten back to us.

This isn't the first time Paris has gotten in trouble for snubbing a charity. At the Elton John Aids Foundation post-Oscar bash she failed to pay for a ticket for entrance to the party. A rep later told the press that Paris had instructed her accountant to cut a check for $10,000 for the foundation.

To help Paris clear up her bad charity karma, we checked to see how she could help others if she followed Angelina's lead and donated one third of her earnings.

According to Forbes magazine, Paris made $6.5 million in 2004. If she gave one-third of that to charity, roughly $2.1 million, here's where the money could go.

* In Namibia she could feed 4,205 families for a year.

* She could build 429 one-room school houses in a developing country, according to Free the Children.

* The North Star Foundation says they could specially train 858 dogs to be companions for autistic children.

* According to Habitat for Humanity's website, they could potentially build either 35 houses in the United States or up to 2,681 houses in some third world countries.

Tags: Angelina Jolie, AngelinaJolie, brad pitt, BradPitt, charity, elton john, EltonJohn, oprah, paris hIlton, ParisHilton, pauil newman, PauilNewman, pual newman, PualNewman, sandra bullock, SandraBullock

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 5) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. EXCUSE ME?!
Brangelina only encourage stars to USE thier charity work (that many were already doing and many already donating to charities with out bragging about it) - to further thier careers. PR reps know a good thing when they see and after Jolie and Brad not only bragged about thier charity but made thier own kids into mini ambassadors for the Brangelina road show - they told thier clients to do the same.
Brad and Angelina are pompous fakes and this blog site it the worst.

Posted at 7:33PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Telli

17. This is BS - TMZ is sucking up to Brange - are you out of touch with the rest of the blogs out there???

Posted at 7:34PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Kasey

18. I THINK TZM IS A BRANGELINA FAN! DONT COMPARE WHAT NICOLE , OPRAH AND THE OTHER STARS DO WITH THIS CRAZY CRACK WHORE. THEY'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR AGES COMPARE TO THE CRAZY HO. AT LEAST THEY DONT BRAG ABOUT WHAT THEY DO, LIKE THIS MENTALLY ILL WHORE. SHE'LL DO ANYTHING TO BOOST HER SELF IMAGE WHEN WE KNOW DAMN WELL THAT SHE'S ONLY GOOD FOR ONE THING, AND THAT IS STEALING OTHER PEOPLES MAN(HUSBAND).

Posted at 7:48PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Messenger

19. I think what Angelina and brad does is great their helping less fortunate people. What I DON'T understand is why is it always people from other countries. We have millions of homeless and orphaned children right here in America what are American children NOT good enough for them? What's up with that?

Posted at 8:47PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Jaime

20. Kidman has been doing charity longgg before Jolie... Why should Jolie and Pitt get all the credit??? Paris is a devil... that's why she's always saying things are so "HOT" cause she's from hell...

Posted at 11:33PM on Jun 22nd 2006 by Suzzie

21. Completely off the topic of this article is my comment about the grammar contained in it..... The use of rather then, should be rather than at the ending of the third paragraph. Then is a reference to time. I know, "who died and made me English teacher?"

Posted at 6:59AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Katy

22. I absolutely agree. A&B did not pressure Bono, Oprah, or Kidman to commit to charities. They've been doing it for a long time. And something else here! That's just great that A&B and other celebrities are helping third world countries and all, don't get me wrong, it's really great. But, what about the good ole U.S. of A.???? Where was A&B when Katrina hit? Obviously not helping out with our relief efforts. I think that they should help out with our problems here too, not just overseas. How can we really help anyone, until we have helped ourselves too?

Posted at 7:52AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Holly

23. Just for the Record DeeBee, Bono being from IRELAND and not the U.S.A. HAS helped the people of HIS own country. He has been doing children's charities in IRELAND of years now! Think outside the U.S.A. for a change.. jeesh! Besides famous people may give lots of money but it's the average people like us who put in the time and the most votes, and make the most difference. Most of the poverty in the United States is the result of a poorly run government! I LOVE the U.S.A and I do believe that at this time Thomas Jefferson was right, dissent is the highest form of patriotism! When was the last time any of you bothered to learn about and help our own third world economic status areas of our country, namely the Native American reservations and THEIR starving, sick, and dieing children and elders. OUR GOVERNMENT AND MOST FAMOUS PEOPLE DO NOTHING! What have YOU done? Here you all sit debating which celebrity is most selfish based on what they give or don't, when was the last time YOU did something TMZ?!?! When was the last time any of you took time from your life to help out in any way other than sending money? ACT don't just TALK about it!

Posted at 8:19AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Meghan

24. Umm.. a lot of people posting are making fools of themselves because they either just skimed the article or failed to understand what it said... for example post #15 by DeeBee. You are upset, obviously, but you argue that Oprah, Bono And Paul Newman have been giving for years.. which is true and that is EXACTLY what the article said!!
It said "While the new round of celeb heart pouring is an outgrowth of Brangelina's work in Africa, other celebs have been big in the free-money circuit for years"
So You're arguing against nothing.. Read the article more carefully next time.

Posted at 8:22AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by LittleIrishGirl

25. whoever said paris hilton doesn't know the backstreet boys is stupid cause she dated nick carter one of the singer duh she knew them and i do think she is extremely stingy with her money she a freakin ariss even if she did make 6.5 million she's got mommy and daddy to run back to

Posted at 8:23AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by opinionated

26. I am so sick of Brangelina. I'm sick and tired of you people putting names together think it is cute when in fact it makes you sound stupid. Can't you come up with anything better. It was funny with Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck but now it's just stupid.

Posted at 9:56AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Jenn

27. First of all, Angelina has been doing UNHCR work from 2001. That's a few years before this whole triangle.

If Angelina wants to do what she is doing for good PR, she's picked the wrong horse. Just cut a paste from a quote:

".... had AJ wanted to do humanitarian work 
for PR purposes only she would focus all her efforts on working on 
projects in the US. As we have been told plenty of times, there's 
a lot to do right her in the US so why doesn't she do it? There are 
over 40% of Americans who are inadequately insured for medical 
and health insurance. Then there's the handicapped kids, the 
katrina victims, the American Indians stuck on reservations, the 
orphans etc. If she were to throw the sort of energy into thos 
issues in the US, I'm sure she'll get plenty of publicity. Plenty of 
benefit concerts to organise, plenty of photo opportunities to play 
in FRONT OF THE PAPS.
What she has done is in fact the opposite. She has chosen to try 
and highlight those who are forgotten. Sierra Leone, Darfur (I 
mean, its not exactly in the news is it until the last couple of 
weeks), Bosnia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Many of the places she 
visited were actually dangerous and NOT ONE OF THE PAPPARAZI 
WERE PRESENT. So, for someone who is supposedly a brilliant 
media manipulator, she's chosen a lot of hard work with doubtful 
returns to focus her energies to generate good PR for herself.
And do you know why the PAPS were not present in Sierra Leone 
and Darfur and other places?? FOR 2 REASONS:
1) because NO ONE IS ACTUALLY THAT interested in reading 
about Darfur and Sierra Leone so, Paps don't want to cover those 
stories so BANG, there goes the Photo Opportunity right?? and
2) Because there is always the risk of being kidnapped, of being 
killed. Even that pseudologist, Laura what her name 
acknowledges that those would be dangerous places. Do you 
think the paps followed George Clooney and his father to Darfur 
recently? I'm sure there would have been plenty of Photo 
opportunities but nope, I guess it would have been better if 
Clooney and his Dad just attended a demonstration and a benefit 
dinner about Darfur in the Washington DC eh???

Posted at 10:01AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Vial vs Vile

28. How rude it is for some people to think that stars dont care about the US! It's not like there aren't people here that CANT help their communtiy! To think that only celebs can help reduce poverty is just plain stupid! Dont be so selfish. Other countries need a LOT more help than the US. You shouldnt just relie on celebs to make the world a better place. To do that you need the WHOLE world help itself. So what if some celbs are faking to just get publicity? Not ALL of them think just about themselves. It doesnt matter if you donate $1 million (it sure does help though) or $10. Aktleast your helping others in need. We should all atleast TRY to help others than ourselves.

Posted at 10:15AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by cassy

29. Can't you people read before you post? #15 and #12, the article clearly contrasts the "new" charity work (inspired, so it claims, by B&A) with historic do-gooders such as Oprah, Newman, and Bono: "While the the new round of celeb heart pouring is an outgrowth of Brangelina's work in Africa, other celebs have been big in the free-money circuit for years."

There may be good reasons to resent this article, but that isn't one of them!

Posted at 10:29AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Nic

30. OK I Think It's REALLY Stupid That Some People Like Pairs Hilton Have Like 6 Million Dollars And Just Keep It All To Themselves Just So Like They Can Show Off With All The Clothes And Big Houses And Stuff When They Could Give Money To People Who Dont Have Anything At All I Mean Paris Hilton Is Has Enough Money She Can Give Some To Charity And I Mean Like Those Hospitals And The Kids Who Dont Have Anything Could Go A Long Way If Paris Just gave 1 Million Dollars...And She Would Still Have Like 5-7 Million Dollars!

Posted at 10:37AM on Jun 23rd 2006 by Roxy

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments