Popped Paparazzo Tells TMZ What Went Down

Clint Brewer: click to watch!The paparazzo arrested yesterday at a day care center attended by Maddox Jolie-Pitt tells TMZ that he did not trespass on the grounds of the center nor did he jump any fences surrounding the facility, and that the police "wanted to make an example out of someone."

TMZ talked to Clint Brewer, who did not want his face shown on camera, last night as he left Lost Hills police station. The 25-year-old freelance photographer said he was detained there by sheriff's deputies for six hours. He says police impounded his Volkswagen Touareg SUV and over $100,000 worth of equipment inside, and that he won't be seeing the stuff until at least July 16, when he has to appear on court on a misdemeanor charge of trespassing.

Hordes of celebrity photographers and videographers have been staking out the Jolie-Pitt compound, its surroundings, and its residents ceaselessly since the couple returned from Namibia with baby Shiloh Nouvel.  Brad Pitt's security chief, Rich Malchar, issued this statement yesterday: "School officials and myself feel that some of these paparazzi are like predators who will recklessly take and sell photos of innocent children for money."



The actual incident for which Brewer was arrested by the Los Angeles County Sheriff is still somewhat unclear, as it was reported yesterday that the lensman jumped a fence at the day care center, and then that he was hiding in bushes at the facility trying to take pictures of young Maddox when he was apprehended by the a member of the day care's staff.

Brewer claims that there is no fence at the day care- at all- and that he didn't take any pictures of Maddox, the proof of which is in the camera that the police confiscated. 

He says that what he was actually arrested for was parking his car on private property, not for trespassing on the grounds of the facility. According to the written complaint that Brewer showed TMZ, the arrest was made for a "602(N)P.C./Trespassing; Driving Veh. On Private Property without Owner's Consent."

Brewer says he was driving up the Pacific Coast Highway to the Jolie-Pitt residence in Malibu when he saw the family going towards the day care center, at which point he followed them and "went to have a look but didn't see anything."

The Jolie-Pitt security asked him to stop shooting, and called the police, who, according to Brewer, "turned up and wanted to make an example out of someone and has [sic]," after which they took him to the station for booking.

Before TMZ spoke to Brewer, he walked out of the police station with his shirt covering his face- classic photo-avoidance maneuver- an ironic pose for someone whose livelihood is earned on the other side of the lens.

Related link:
Brangelina Paparazzo Arrested

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 4) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

31. God forbid someone snap a photo of a Bragelina kid and not make a huge payment to Jolie-Pitt. Get over yourselves, you two.

How come when Pee Wee Herman snaps pixtures of kids he only has to pay a small fine? And those kids were naked.

Posted at 12:38AM on Jun 24th 2006 by Snappy

32. and if he had a gun or weapon and killed someone.. ? Stalkers are suspicious emotionally abusive people with a purpose to exploit others and greatly enjoy controlling the relationship and relentless too; they often pick victims who are unattainable in some way, so when they get caught and have no right to tresspass on the privacy of businesses, schools, homes and private property they act as if it is a legitimate job or right they have to associate with the victim because it is important to the world they have this contact. The scary part.. he stalks a child!!? People who do this ..grow up having a very poor sense of their own mature identities and no pity for the innocence, peace of the child. This, coupled with a predisposition toward psychosis, leads them to strive for satisfaction through another, yearning to merge with someone who is almost always perceived to be of a higher status (doctors, lawyers, teachers) or very socially desirable (celebrities). What these stalkers cannot attain in reality is achieved through fantasy and it is for this reason that the delusion seems to be so difficult to relinquish: Even gaining an imaginary link to celebirty in photographing the victim; is better than no special notice at all.

Posted at 3:26AM on Jun 24th 2006 by dmumsie

33. Susan, either you are very naiv or very stupid. At least the money goes to a good cause. They do not have a choice, the frenzy will get even greater if they did not sell the pictures.

Posted at 4:49AM on Jun 24th 2006 by Stella

34. He shouldn't of trespassed, I like to look on this website too, because I think there is a part of people who like to see celebrities humanized and and not hyped up like they sometimes can be. People like to relate. There is a fascination with someone with that type of money and power that the average american doesn't have. I think there are some celebs who would miss the photogs if they wree gone, even though they would never admit it. However, I think photos should be taked in the correct forum and with some restraint. Tresspassing is illegal whether you are doing your job or not. I think he is full of bs too, the only reason there is no shot of Angelina kids on his camera is because someone got to him before he took it, and to they guy who is suing Britney for running over his foot, um, dude, get out of the way, they should have to sit and wait to leave while you bombard their vehicle, C'mon that is crossing the line, and you know it !!!!!

Posted at 4:52AM on Jun 24th 2006 by Chad

35. they did not sell the pictures for personal gain! photos would have been taken regardless, at least the way it was done the money went to charity!

Posted at 2:51PM on Jun 24th 2006 by annette

36. Does this guy have a child, lets jumb over a fence and stalk his children, people like this are parasites.Normal human beings don't put children in situations like this, he was going to day care for crying out loud, trying to grow up a normal as possible considering his parents. I hope his court date is delayed longer and his car keep ,make him take the bus.

Posted at 3:01PM on Jun 24th 2006 by J-lo

37. I wouldn't doubt if we found out he was a pedophile or had "issues" later. It's very odd that as an adult man, he thinks going to a daycare to try and shoot pics of little kids is a "cool" thing to do. It's not like there aren't a million pics of Maddox already out there, so why was it a necessity for him to go and stalk kids at a daycare? I think a lot of people with "fringe personalities" are hiding behind cameras as an excuse. I am glad the school is protecting those kids. Maddox isn't the movie star; his parents are, so why stalk him and the other kids at daycare? Bizarre!

Posted at 4:03PM on Jun 24th 2006 by Sunny

38. We all know that this is the downside of fame.
That's why most people don't want to be famous.

brangelina have sold photos of all of their kids quite happily.
you really can't complain about the freebies.

anyways, to anyone who thinks AJ donates 1/3 of her income, IT'S NOT TRUE.
she only did it on ONE occasion. when she got paid about 15 million for a movie.
before you believe any famous person, you should check the facts.
but this was all besides the point, sorry...

Posted at 6:11PM on Jun 24th 2006 by Anthony

39. Shouldn't a bodyguard be around Maddox at all times anyways? And IF there aren't any fences, what the hell kind of daycare is this? It sucks that kids are sometimes the target of their parents, but that's how it goes. If she doesn't like her kids being photographed, then maybe she should look for a better daycare and have a bodyguard with him at all times. I'm sure Maddox is old enough to know why all this is going on. Besides if anything were to happen, she'd just adopt another foreign kid and get on with her life. She's a heartless person who's selfish and I'm really quite sick of hearing about her and her homewrecking ways.

Posted at 6:17PM on Jun 24th 2006 by KC

40. Do any of you really think this would be happening at your daycare? She sells pictures of her children and their lives everyday and now is mad that someone tries and gets one without asking. That is just bs. I have a 5 month old and i couldn't imagine selling her for money and that is what some of these celebs do. They are not better people and they are not more important then any other person in this world and neither are there children.

Posted at 6:45PM on Jun 24th 2006 by Kasey

41. re:Parents who sell pictures of their kids can't complain about the freebies. They chose to make their kids a commodity.

So you're saying that it's ok to put the other children at this daycare at risk? Newsflash to you, the paps treats everything B&A does as a commodity,
They don't have to do a thing.

Posted at 12:03AM on Jun 25th 2006 by cain

42. Paparazzi101 0 stars

You being a leach we do expect this sort of crap. Question, if the lives of others are so important why is this jerk hiding his face? What about your life? Is it also a free for all to see? GET A DAMN LIFE. You are a bunch of losers who use the fame of others to get money. Get a damn job and stop interfering in the lives of people who simple entertain for a living. What is your excuse for being a leach? You and others like you are just a bunch of jerks. I hope a law is instituted to put an end to your crap you damn set of bastards!!

Posted at 1:31AM on Jun 25th 2006 by Liz

43. Only reason he want to take the pic is because of Brad Pitt. We all know Pitt is the main attraction, otherwise the paparazzi wouldn't give a rats ass about that psycho and her chidren collection hobbies...lol.

Posted at 2:59AM on Jun 25th 2006 by Messenger

44. Paparazzi101 0 starsYou being a leach we do
expect this sort of crap. Question, if the lives of others are so important why is
this jerk hiding his face? What about your life? Is it also a free
for all to see? GET A DAMN LIFE. You are a bunch of losers who use
the fame of others to get money. Get a damn job and stop interfering
in the lives of people who simple entertain for a living. What is
your excuse for being a leach? You and others like you are just a
bunch of jerks. I hope a law is instituted to put an end to your crap
you damn set of bastards!!

Posted at 4:39AM on Jun 25th 2006 by Liz

45. TO LIZ:

and the public buys the mags and visits the websites where these photos are.
we are the reason these photos exist.

so people in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks.

anyways these people have pimped out their kids by their own free will, so they can't complain.
Now if the pap was after Suri Cruise, that would be another matter.

Posted at 6:17AM on Jun 25th 2006 by Anthony

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |