Lets Get This Party Started
Let's Get This Party Started: Top Stories for Monday 06/26/06

One of celebdom's abiding mysteries – why have we not seen a picture of Suri Cruise? – may have at least one, plainly financial, explanation: None of the big glossies was willing to pay enough for pictures of the newborn.



According to a report this morning by Fox News' Roger Friedman, the photo agency WireImage was offered a chance to take pictures of the infant child of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes just after birth. And, as eventually happened with Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's child Shiloh, the agency conducted an auction with PEOPLE, Us Weekly, Star, and other celebrity magazines to decide who would have the privilege of running the exclusive snaps.

Unlike Shiloh, however, whose pictures garnered a reported $4 million from PEOPLE, the bidding for little Suri topped out at $3 million, which her parents decided wasn't enough to go ahead with the shoot. And now, according to a source at one of the magazines, Suri's price – despite the speculation and curiosity – has gone down, now that she's all of three months old.

"Shiloh was the whole deal," the source tells Friedman, referring to the Jolie-Pitt offspring. "We won't see a baby like that for a while."

Demi Unabashed About Plastic Surgery

Demi Moore doesn't look like a 43-year-old woman – and she intends to keep it that way. The actress and wife of 28-year-old Ashton Kutcher tells the London Mirror (via MSNBC) that she doesn't have any qualms about getting the odd nip or tuck – or both – to keep her looking, oh, about her husband's age.

"It's been a challenging few years, being the age I am, with so much focus on how I look," says Moore. "I'm not 20. Not 30. But I'm certainly different from what most people feel someone in her 40s should be." What's more, she says, "I have no problem with enhancing one's looks or fixing something that's changed." Demi also tells the Mirror she may have gone a little far a few years back when she started going for the super-buff look.

On a more romantic note, Moore says that Kutcher is her "soul mate" and that when they met, she "didn't just come with baggage – I had trunks!"

Costello and Krall Expecting

Musicians Elvis Costello and Diana Krall announced Sunday that they are expecting their first child in December, according to a spokesman for the rock-jazz romantic duo. The baby's birth should come just about as the Grammy-winning couple celebrates its third wedding anniversary.

Costello, 51, is on tour with New Orleans legend Allen Toussaint, with whom he recently recorded an album, "The River in Reverse." The 41-year-old Krall is planning to release a new album in September.

Pellicano Case In Question

The federal investigation of Hollywood private eye Anthony Pellicano is stalling, and with a dearth of new indictments and overall progress on the case, there are signs that the big targets that investigators hoped to nab might not be forthcoming.

According to a detailed report in this morning's Los Angeles Times, government code-breakers have been slow in decrypting audio files belonging to Pellicano that are an important part of the investigation because agencies are occupied with other matters like counter-terrorism. What's more, uncertainty about the strength of the case is being fuelled by the fact that prosecutors have not yet sought an indictment against entertainment lawyer Bert Fields, the highest-profile Hollywood figure to acknowledge that he is a subject of the investigation, and other major players.

Federal authorities say that the investigation is "continuing" and that, as the FBI Assistant Director who runs the LA division puts it, "it's not for us to puff up or deflate something."

Eisner Gets Back Into Kids' Market

As befits a man who spent the best years of his professional life running the studio best known for Mickey Mouse and Ariel the Mermaid, former Disney chief Michael Eisner is returning to the children's sector by buying a company that teaches kids math and spelling using college athletics.

Confused? Imagine the kids: Team Baby Entertainment makes DVDs that use official footage of a given university's sports teams – Michigan, Texas, and Notre Dame among them – to help children learn basic educational concepts. Eisner, who recently made an investment in Internet TV broadcaster Veoh Networks, is using his Tornante Company to buy stakes in various businesses, and Team Baby is just the latest.

Eisner is certainly hoping that his business decisions fare somewhat better than his CNBC talk show: the latest episode attracted only 70,000 viewers overall, according to Nielsen ratings.

Dan Abrams "Close To Figuring Out" What He Wants to Do at MSNBC

The announcement that Dan Abrams would be made the general manager of MSNBC was greeted with "shock and awe," according to a colleague. "People were just stunned."

A couple weeks on, according to a look inside the network and its choice by Bill Carter in today's New York Times, the selection of Abrams and Phil Griffin to replace Rick Kaplan represents less a shocking, but still significant, change in the network's approach. While Abrams denied that an overhaul was coming, he does want more breaking news coverage during the channel's daytime hours and less talking heads during primetime. As the president of NBC News, Steve Capus, puts it, "Prime time is the focus. That's where the money is."

According to Abrams, the network will try to build on the momentum that Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews have brought to the network, while making the daytime programming on the channel "more urgent" and less "newscasty."

Tags: Katie Holmes, KatieHolmes, Let's Get This Party Started, Let'sGetThisPartyStarted, Tom Cruise, TomCruise

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 19) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. If Tom C. wasn't able to produce children with wife's one and two, why would anyone believe he actually sired this one. Sperm probably came from a sperm bank of Scientologists. If he had not acted so goofy and off the wall about his relationship with Katie, he might possibly be excused. But on the other hand, she was acting just as wacky with all the public demonstrations. Sad situation with these two. With the 3 million he was supposedly offered, was any of it going to charity? Or more into his pocket as the $67 million he reportedly earned last year.

Posted at 2:26PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Nancyh

32. maybe, just maybe he has about 1% class left in him (doubtful tho) and refuses to sell out his own kid like his (pretend woman friend) BRAD PITT. I think those among the normal minded people will agree that selling a picture of your own kid and "claiming" it's for the poor children of Africa is a bit repulsing.

That money that was donated has never been confirmed by any organization.
usually when you want to bring attention to a needy cause and "claim" to donate a large amount of money, you let the public know the the charity that is in need, not the amount you gave for your own publicity.

Brad and Tom have become the most egotistical freaks and fakes in HOLLYWOOD!

Posted at 2:27PM on Jun 26th 2006 by foxy415

33. This is all kind of like the late summer commercials for next year's cars. All the spotlighting and hype, but what if there's no new model introduction. If this is really about money, then Tom and Katie should be ashamed of themselves. If I'm not mistaken, at least much of the money from pix of the Jolie-Pitt baby was given to charity. I haven't heard that's why T&K want a bigger yield. I don't know T&K personally, so I'm really not qualified to say this, but it just seems the whole union is for show and I don't expect relationship longetivity is a given. Too bad ... they're both overtly beautiful people ... a teeny-bopper with a crush and a poster boy who probably just wants the world his tallywacker works.

Posted at 2:28PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Pam

34. WHO CARES??? Honestly I suspect something is cosmetically "unpleasing" about the little baby. Maybe she has a cone head from all the pushing Katie had to do.

Posted at 2:32PM on Jun 26th 2006 by wendy harbinger

35. I sooo do not think there even is a baby Suri. I agree with you, Jessica O.

Posted at 2:33PM on Jun 26th 2006 by suep

36. Tom and Kate are terrible role models for anyone who worships these idiots!
They're immoral and thrive on publicity. I don't wish to see either them or their poor, innocenct child who is saddled with a couple of loonies for "parents"?

Posted at 2:33PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Stella M. Rice

37. How do rumors get started? started by jealous people, so why doesn't everyone just leave them alone? ( post # 10 has it right!)

Posted at 2:34PM on Jun 26th 2006 by KZ

38. It's Hollywood "anything for a dime" mentality....All of the Hollywood set are just a bunch of whores and will do and say anything for $$$$$$$. They will work in C rated pictures if their a buck in it....marry people half their age, for publicity or so they think will make them look young....anything for a dollar.....It's so sad....and as for their children, enough money and they'll parade them anywhere....IT'S ALL MONEY WITH THESE PEOPLE....AND THEN THEY TRY TO TELL US HOW TO VOTE,& LIVE.....I feel sorry for their children

Posted at 2:34PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Shirl

39. I DON'T THINK THIS KID IS REAL, EITHER-HOW COULD A MEDIA HOG LIKE TOM CRUISE REALLY KEEP HIS KID OUT OF THE LIMELIGHT, CONSIDERING HE LIVES FOR THIS CRAP??? I WON'T BELIEVE THERE WAS A KID UNTIL I SEE IT!!

Posted at 2:36PM on Jun 26th 2006 by debbie

40. maybe E.T PHONE HOME AND TOOK THE CHILD ,HELL MAYBE HE JUMPED ALL OVER THE COUCH,AND THREW UP THE BABY

Posted at 2:36PM on Jun 26th 2006 by LANE

41. I do think if they want a picture of Suri they should pay for it and pay, the parents asking price, Why not! imagine how much those magazines will make after that shot they know that they will make alot more than what they are offering and with all the negative Publicity Tom And Katie are getting why should they let them take pictures of their Daughter for free make them pay For her or keep her away from the public eye until they pay why should they get a free shot of their Daughter and bank on her I love Katie And Tom People should mine their business and let them be

Posted at 2:38PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Kimberly

42. Did you ever think that maybe tom and katie want to
keep their child out of the public eye because of people
who can't respect their privacy. Like my mother always
said if you can't say anything nice then don't say anything at all.
It's rude to speak about other people let alone talk bably
about an infant.

Posted at 2:39PM on Jun 26th 2006 by beth

43. I dont think Tom fathered the baby, I think she was artificialy done. I bet Suri doesn't look a bit like him because of that, and he doesn't want anyone to figure it out.

Posted at 2:40PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Tara

44. Sad to say, it's all about $$$. Wasn't that the reason for his divorce with N. Kidman? Her rights to his assets in the event of a divorce after ten years of marriage translated to divorce to save money. Tom, she obviously doesn't need your money.Hopefully, with your expertise on psychology, preganancy, post-partum depression, scientology, etc. you do a better job with marriage number 2. Or am I forgetting something? Has there been a marriage number 2 yet? For her sake, I hope not.

Posted at 2:41PM on Jun 26th 2006 by Shirley

45. WHY SHOULD WE LEAVE THEM ALONE TOM NEVERED LEFT BROOKE SHEILDS ALONE, AND WHO EVER ELSE IS ON HIS ----- LIST.

Posted at 2:42PM on Jun 26th 2006 by LANE

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments