Pam Strips, Bashes Beyoncé

31. Well, you may think she is an "idiot" but her stripping got THE attention PETA needs, and the boards are talking about her cause.

Pretty smart "idiot" i'd say!

Posted at 12:36PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Lucy

32. Pam doing what Pam does best - getting naked!!!

Posted at 12:37PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Rubydo

33. I don't always agree with the tactics for getting the message across. BUT, it is a important message. Say NO to animal cruelty and do not wear fur! What some find tasteless ( ie: Pam Anderson) some find true, we came into this world naked, hopefully we have evolved enough not to wear animal pelts any longer for cover, there are many other fabric choices!

Posted at 12:38PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Ellen

34. Let's get naked - the Pamela Anderson motto, I take it!

Posted at 12:38PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Rubydo

35. Lara 0 stars - my young son also can't speak, do laundry or clean the house and as humans are animals, does that mean you would wear him?? "Dominion over the animals," means we should care for them as opposed to abusing them. But I'm a Christian so my outlook is biased by my religious views.

Posted at 12:39PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Mary George

36. I can't believe so many people are so bent out of shape over nudity. It's not like she did a Hustler spread in the window.

Also, while I understand people being concerned about other important issues such as homelessness, starving children,etc, I think it is very arrogant to dismiss animals the way some people do. It is exactly why a lot of people like animals more than people. "Screw them, they are just animals."

Do you think people with this midset would offer their furs to the homeless people so they could stay warm? Doubt it. A lot of them are probably the same people that tell them to get a job.

Posted at 12:41PM on Jun 29th 2006 by me

37. Who Cares what PETA says or does. Poor children go unnoticed while a homeless animal gets all the attention.Tell PETA to get there priorities straight.

Posted at 12:42PM on Jun 29th 2006 by H. Furman

38. I think Pamela Anderson could have done this without taking her clothing off. U can do many things to get your point across without not getting so drastic. I think she is wanting more publicity. She seems the type. I feel sorry for her kids. Instead of acting like the mother she should be she is exposing herself for her own enjoyment. Pamela always struck me as the whorish type of women.

Posted at 12:42PM on Jun 29th 2006 by sharla

39. How many of you that are so supportive are wearing something leather (for fashion) at this moment and have meat in you freezer (for hunger)? The average person does not own fur because they can not afford it and therefore does not car about her protest.

I wonder if there's any animal product in the MAC makeup she wears? Is that not for fashion?

Tommy Lee doesn’t look like a grass eater. Remember Stella McCartney is a vegan.

Posted at 12:43PM on Jun 29th 2006 by jj

40. I think that #15 hit it right on the nose with the comments. If half these people saw a wreck on the highway and there was an animal and a person laying
there because of the wreck most of them would help the animal first. That is
what our world has come to. People should always come first. I do love my
animals, but I love the human race more.

Posted at 12:48PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Jennifer

41. I think it is wonderful that Pamela has devoted so much time to something so important. If more people had hearts like hers the world would be a better place. Unfortunately the ignorance in the world outweighs the intelligence!!

Good JOB PAM!!

Posted at 12:50PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Kelly

42. I do not believe that stripping to nothing tells anything about fur killing animals. I think it is a way for a trashy woman to get more people giving her attention. And her kids will grow up seeing her that way. There is more respectful ways to protest fur than taking your clothes off. It's a great way to tell kids it's okay to use your body in disrespectful ways and let men think it's okay to disrespect women. And the ones who think getting naked for a cause is great are truly perverts and the only cause they care about is seeing her naked or any other person. I don't see how letting our kids see a naked woman makes this country any better. Actually it makes our country worse by bringing up more rapist and stupid women.

Posted at 12:51PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Christy

43. god all you people are horrible displays for our earth.
Animals are part of mother nature part of our earth.
Maybe, yes people need them to survie, to eat.
But, by all means they are not to be taking from their home, put in small cages where they can not even turn around and then skinned ALIVE!!!!
Have a heart! Not to sound corny but animals are our friends!
They have every right to be here.
Sex sells now a days and even if getting naked has nothing to do with Fur or animals it makes people listen!! it gets our attention! Is that not why we are all posting on this story? Some of you people are so cruel. I dear one of you to set foot in a fur farm! I have been there i have seen these horrible people killing little animals so what, so someone rich can have a fur hat or fur coat! There is no excuse for killing god's creatures for articles of clothing.... no right! no right!
If one day far in the future little children become a hot Commodity would you wear your children? Yes drastik comment, but some people on this earth love animals, they rescue animals they care for them.... as do I and alot of people on this earth. You dont have to be vegan to show your love for animals. Killing animals for their fur should be illegal as should leather purses. It is not a necessity to ear fur....

People have a heart....

You can not put a price tag on animals....

I would rather die then have to go back to a fur farm and see how horrible the proccess of fur making takes place.

I Congratulate Pam for her beliefs !!!

As far as her having no class...

I think she has more class than anyone here!

Always and Forever!!

Posted at 12:53PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Anna

44. Well - I am grateful that Pam is doing this - she is getting attention - and people who sell clothes (B & JL) are greedy and uninformed. They are sickening to me - and really if they lived on your block you being talking about the girl with the giant *ss in the brown house! Yuck. Pam doesn't wear leather shoes - I admire her for making people aware of what is going on -

Posted at 12:54PM on Jun 29th 2006 by **rock**

45. i have a lot more sympathy for animals than i do homeless people. people act of their own volition, and i have experienced offering jobs and food to homeless people that don't want it. it is a lifestyle choice. we have used industry to populate this land, and animals are at our mercy. we act with a moral thinking ablity under our own volition, and our domesticated dogs, cats, horses, and these helpless animals that are raised or caught in traps are under our power. they feel pain and emotion as we do, and i would not want to be scalped and thrown to the side for a wig. if you are going to by fur, at least buy vintage fur... there should be no new aspects of this industry.

Posted at 1:05PM on Jun 29th 2006 by kimberly