Pam Strips, Bashes Beyoncé

61. Let's see under Pamela Anderson is fake boobs, fake hair color, fake eyelashes, and tons and tons of makeup. She is just a fake person who has no real career, and obvouisly will do anything, anywhere for attention. She is a bad role model for PETA. She is just a WHORE! How much talant does it take to take your cloths off. Something everyone learns from the time your a toddler. PETA need to get it's priorities straight and so does Stella McCartney when it comes to Spam. It is not jealousy over Pam, it's just the TRUTH!

Posted at 3:20PM on Jun 29th 2006 by T. T. Sorensen

62. I wear fur and I wear leather and I date a girl who wears them, too. I don't even brake for cats. All that notwithstanding, Pammy can get naked any time she wants and I'll patiently sit through it.

I owe her for BarbWire. It got me through a dark space.

Posted at 3:46PM on Jun 29th 2006 by slinkybender

63. Hey # 15, you need a reality check. We "as humans, have dominion over the animals"? Did your little bitty Bible tell you that? LOL. I hate to tell you this but WE'RE animals too. Merely more sophisticated and intelligent ones. They're "just" animals indeed.

Posted at 3:48PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Dood

64. I am thrilled that people like Pam Anderson are so outspoken in their defense of animals. If she has to draw attention to her cause by being nude, fine! She is helping to save innocent, tortured animals. I have no respect for Beyonce and J-lo. I don't care if they have talent or can put on a show. I will NEVER support them in any way. You can't possibly be a good human being and promote the killing of animals. I hope Beyonce and J-lo lose a lot of fans over this . They should be ashamed of themselves!

Posted at 4:06PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Eve

65. PETA is a great organization and does alot of good trying to help animals that can't help them selves, but how is her stripping helping, getting a bunch a horney old dudes bothered. And who really wants to see artifical boobs.

REALLY, she needs to get a life and PETA should find a more suitable spokeswoman or spokesman!

Posted at 4:07PM on Jun 29th 2006 by SherriS

66. To HKY mom- Pink is a member of PETA and has worked with this campaign, so she'd probably agree.

Ad hominim attacks (calling Pam a slut/classless, etc) aren't really arguments, since the fur industry is what she's talking about here. What are you trying to prove?

Posted at 4:09PM on Jun 29th 2006 by debate101

67. PETA's intentions MAY be laudable and worthy but their tactics are stupid and crazy most of the time. They do more to hurt their cause than help it. For those casually paying attention they make all pro-animal rights people seem like total asses with extreme positions and methods.

Getting naked only attracts horny people. And stuff like pouring fake blood on people only makes people sympathize with the person attacked by the blood throwers.

PETA is the animal rights equivalent of Howard Stern.

Posted at 4:19PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Jim

68. I HATE PAMELA!! I THINK SHE IS ONLY INTERESTED SO SHE CAN POSE NUDE! SHE IS A PIG AND I HATE HER SO MUCH! SHE ISNT EVEN PRETTY,SHE IS WHITE TRASH AND SO GROSS!! SHE IS TRASH TRASH TRASH!! THATS IS PAMELA, POSE NUDE TO SHOW HOW YOU WANT TO PROTECT ANIMALS!!! THAT MAKES SENSE!! LOSER! F ING LOSER SHE IS! YOUR PARENTS MUST BE SO PROUD TO HAVE SUCH A DIRTY SLUT AS THEIR DAUGHTER!

Posted at 4:25PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Rosaria

69. Nudity is so vile, so much more so than skinning some hapless critter when there are alternatives out there like clothes made from plants or synthetics or wools sheared from an animal that will survive the process.

But animals are lesser creatures than humans, so what difference does it make? But than I find most people lesser creatures than myself, so I should be able to exploit them as I see fit. Maybe I can skin them and wear them for a fashion statement? I bet I could even find people desparate enough in this crazy world who would sell me their own skins just to feed their families. That would be legal, I bet. Truth be told, as a male in his prime of above average height and muclular frame, well-armed, and of above average wealth, I should be able to damn well what I want to 95% of the world's human population and anything at all to anything in the animal kingdom.

Which is one reason I find the concept of women's rights and rape and child abuse and labor laws and slavery and human rights such silly nonsense. If God and Nature bestowed these benefits to me and not other people, than clearly I am meant to have dominion over those beings God and Nature clearly meant to dominated. No?

Posted at 5:01PM on Jun 29th 2006 by noble

70. Hey Lara,
Go fetch.

Posted at 5:02PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Pennylane

71. 15, you couldn't have put it any better.

Posted at 5:04PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Paul

72. I am most concerned about the poor grammar here. Our school system is failing! You people need to get off the computer and go back to school.

Posted at 5:04PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Betty

73. Someone should protest the innocent killing of wild virgin silicone that were slaughtered to stuff into her chest. She is so disfigured by plastic surgery that she makes me want to vomit.

Posted at 6:00PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Joan

74. I don't agree with all the tactics activists use, but if it gets others talking then it's serving its purpose.

Everyone has a cause they believe in. I don't object to eating meat but to the process in which it comes to us. Don't you want to be informed before declaring the other viewpoint is wrong or right?

Educate yourself on the issue and then decide how to choose to live your life. I choose to be compassionate and do as little harm as necessary.

Posted at 7:06PM on Jun 29th 2006 by Sue

75. #50, 57 & 63
I am in total agreement with you. It is nice to see people who care about animals, as they cannot voice their rights. (Oh no, I did I spell this correctly?)

Posted at 7:10PM on Jun 29th 2006 by pennylane