EXCLUSIVE: Suri Cruise Birth Certificate

TMZ has obtained a copy of the official birth certificate of the elusive Suri Cruise, daughter of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.

The document, filed with the Los Angeles County Register-Recorder/County Clerk, was filed May 8, 2006.  (Click on document to download) There are several interesting items of note:

First, St. John's Hospital has a policy of filing birth certificates within 10 days of birth.  In this case, Suri was born on April 18 but the certificate was not filed until May 8, 20 days later.  An official from the hospital told TMZ that the delay occurred because they needed a signature from the parents or a representative of the parents certifying birth, and that person did not come in until May 4.  The person who signed is labeled "friend."  The signature is not legible.

Also, the "Attendant or Certifier" who signed the certificate -- Anne Heffernan, RNC -- was not in the delivery room and did not see the baby.  But a hospital rep tells TMZ that Heffernan is authorized to sign when the doctor is not available.  A hospital rep said "normally the doctor signs" but it isn't a requirement.

Finally, the hospital rep said that the circumstances that triggered the eventual signing of the birth certificate were that Suri needed a passport and a birth certificate is a prerequisite to obtaining one.



Filed under: Baby Watch, Tom & Katie

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 187)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. I think this child was created with Ron Hubbard's DNA and will follow Tom Cruise as leader of Scientology. Can anyone say "Rosemary's Baby"?

Posted at 7:47AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Ric

17. to the first poster here, Tom Cruise legally changed his last name in Cruise. His other kids are called Cruise, same thing for Suri.

Posted at 7:48AM on Jul 10th 2006 by lalla

18. I agree that celebrities should have their own life up to a point but saying they did not choose the spotlight? C'mon...........

Posted at 7:51AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Bonnie Birk

19. WHO CARES!?!?!?!?!?

Posted at 7:53AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Johnny

20. No, it really is none of our business what the baby looks like. However, it does seem strange that they NEVER have their baby! I agree, something is wrong. I understand they want to be private, but don't they ever want to be with her?

Posted at 7:53AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Mary

21. why in the world would a 20 day old baby need a passport? Did they wisk the kid out of the country? Why would they do that? The whole thing is WEIRD.

Posted at 7:55AM on Jul 10th 2006 by mary drau

22. There is no baby! I think it's all a hoax...notice the timing...Mission Impossible III came out shortly after said "baby" was born...haven't seen his android girlfriend in the spotlight at all either since the "birth." While pregnant, she was all over every magazine!!
If there is a baby at all, it is probably not his!!

Posted at 7:55AM on Jul 10th 2006 by melissa

23. So who really cares????I am not interested in what other people do, It is not my business, and besides most of the hollywood people only want media attention which they get. Tom is a good actor but he is a real squirrel outside of that.

Posted at 7:56AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Ron

24. Why does the media always have to make "much ado about nothing?" Leave Tom, Katie and Suri and all the others alone! I don't really care about their personal lives - just as I am sure they don't care about mine or yours. Hasn't the paparazzi done enough damage in this lifetime to satisfy their own greed? Remember 8/31/1997? Get a life, report something newsworthy. Hey here's an idea, why not join the fight again terrorism and aparteid, help stop domestic violence, end child abuse, why don't you trail around and report on the sexual predators - put them behind bars. DO SOMETHING GOOD WITH YOUR LIFE!!!

Posted at 7:56AM on Jul 10th 2006 by DTarantino

25. T, Miller has the right of it. TMZ and whoever "gave" them a copy of the
child's birth certificate ought to be ashamed! Ordinary parents go to
great length to protect their children! You've got some twisted
nerve posting this child's legal single most important ID document
just because you can. Spare us the supposed logic of "right to know" and misguided freedom of speech. This isn't "news". It's downright creepy.

Posted at 7:56AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Murray

26. YES, CELEBRITIES CHILDREN SHOULD BE KEPT OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, BUT AFTER PUBLICIZING THE RELATIONSHIP, AND KATIE'S PREGNANCY SO MUCH, THEY SHOULD AT LEAST RELEASE A PICTURE OF THE BABY. IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO SHOW THE BABY OFF, THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE MADE EVERYTHING ELSE SO PUBLIC. HE'S PROBABLY DOING THIS ON PURPOSE, JUST B/C OF THE REASON WE ARE ALL COMMENTING ON IT NOW. HE WANTS EVERYONE TO TALK ABOUT HIM, AND HIS FAMILY, AND NOT BRAD PITT & ANGELINA JOLIE, AND SHILOH JOLIE-PITT. IF THATS THE REASON, HE'S DEFINANTLY GETTING WHAT HE WANTS.

Posted at 7:57AM on Jul 10th 2006 by jordan

27. I think Tom and Katie will not last and this is why they are keeping Suri away from the public eye. Katie is only going to marry Tom for that money they agreed upon then leave. I feel sorry for Suri.

Posted at 7:58AM on Jul 10th 2006 by carol s

28. Why does the press and the public in general expect Tom and Katie to "show off" their baby? Just because they choose to be (and very successfully so) in the entertainment business , there is no obligation to open their private lives, their children or even what's for lunch to the public. Assumptions only lead to tabloid gossip which is "sellable" to those who need to know and want to believe what they read. Good grief, maybe the baby has two heads !!!!!! Read more about that in a national "right to know"
tabloid......Marteec143@aol.com

Posted at 7:59AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Martee Capilli

29. why in the world would a 20 day old baby need a passport? Did they wisk the kid out of the country? Why would they do that? The whole thing is WEIRD. Just 'strange' that a FRIEND (listed in relationship to child) would sign, and that kinda looks like Tom Cruises signature although illegible as it is.

Posted at 7:59AM on Jul 10th 2006 by mary drau

30. Hmmm...makes one wonder. Maybe she's not really his (?) I'm just sayin! He and Nicole Kidman had to adopt because of somebody's infertility...guess we'll find out if Nicole ever gets knocked up by her new man, eh?

Ah well... in the end it doesn't matter...as long as he's a good and kind father and the baby grows up happy.

Posted at 8:01AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Cindy

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips