EXCLUSIVE: Suri Cruise Birth Certificate

TMZ has obtained a copy of the official birth certificate of the elusive Suri Cruise, daughter of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.

The document, filed with the Los Angeles County Register-Recorder/County Clerk, was filed May 8, 2006. (Click on document to download) There are several interesting items of note:

First, St. John's Hospital has a policy of filing birth certificates within 10 days of birth. In this case, Suri was born on April 18 but the certificate was not filed until May 8, 20 days later. An official from the hospital told TMZ that the delay occurred because they needed a signature from the parents or a representative of the parents certifying birth, and that person did not come in until May 4. The person who signed is labeled "friend." The signature is not legible.

Also, the "Attendant or Certifier" who signed the certificate -- Anne Heffernan, RNC -- was not in the delivery room and did not see the baby. But a hospital rep tells TMZ that Heffernan is authorized to sign when the doctor is not available. A hospital rep said "normally the doctor signs" but it isn't a requirement.

Finally, the hospital rep said that the circumstances that triggered the eventual signing of the birth certificate were that Suri needed a passport and a birth certificate is a prerequisite to obtaining one.



Reader Comments

(Page 6 of 187) Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

76. Maybe no one has seen Katie because she is suffering from postpartum depression and Tom doesn't want anyone to know...
Katie, give Brooke a call....she will help you through it!
But really, who cares?

Posted at 8:23AM on Jul 10th 2006 by R. Hicks

77. What I want to know is how is it possible that Tom Cruise was married twice yet neither of his wives had a biological child with him? Yet he meets Kattie Homes and bang she gets pregnant? Sounded fishy to me from the get go. Tom was soooo excited to be a father why wouldn't he sign the baby's birthcertificate. Why did they allow someone who wasn't at the birth to sign for it.? Guess only him and the 4 walls will ever know the truth.

Posted at 8:23AM on Jul 10th 2006 by VW

78. First, for all who think the "stars" should have privacy....tuff crap-ola....the "stars" are only "star" because the PUBLIC recognizes them as popular.....which means that they GIVE UP many rights the "normal" folks have. REAL stars aren't bothered by the media because they aren't the "nutballs" that Spears, Cruise, Jackson, etc..tend to be. They CHOSE to be in the spotlite---baby riding in mom's lap, man in love jumping on couch, dangling baby over railing.....get the picture yet folks????? NORMAL FAMOUS people ARE NOT in the limelight like this because THEY DO NOT act like this.....any word on the Pitt family, or the Afflick baby being dropped????? Come on and get a clue here. If you don't want negative feedback or press, then DON'T SUPPLY IT!!! As for WHO the father is with some of these celeb babies....DNA tests should be required....ESPECIALLY in the case of Michael Jackson....sorry, you don't turn white like he did (the normal progression of his supposed disease leaves one "spotted" but still black ) and the mix of black and white DOES NOT GIVE ALL WHITE to the offspring. THIS I KNOW FROM MY OWN HALF SIBLINGS.......Our mom is white, their dad is black and ALL 6 of them have black features and DARK skin....sorry there, "Gloved one" but you are claiming SOMEONE ELSES kids as YOUR SEED...DNA would out you on that little game....probably the same with Scientology-Tom as well....funny how he never fathered ANY kids with any of his ex-wives??????? Hmmmmmmmm

Posted at 8:24AM on Jul 10th 2006 by D.J.

79. Do this, close your eyes, vision someone having a baby, going through all the pain, trying to keep something so special to themselves, thinking their child's birth certificate was safe, keeping their child from harms way, can you vision it?
Now what if that was your child? Leave them alone.

Posted at 8:24AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Te

80. Cherl, screw the soldiers.

Posted at 8:25AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Dorothy

81. Don't you also think it is strange that they have never been seen taking the baby out? Very weird. Not even covering up the baby like some people do. I think either there is no baby or Katie had a miscarriage and doesn't remember, so they have to make up all this stuff to keep her calm.

Posted at 8:25AM on Jul 10th 2006 by J. Fowler

82. I am no fan of Tom Cruise and I think this whole pregnancy thing has been strange right from the beginning but at least he has had the decency to keep the child out of the limelight now that she has been born unlike "Brangelina" and Twitney who are using their children as a means to extend their 15 minutes of fame.

Posted at 8:25AM on Jul 10th 2006 by John

83. I think the reason behind all the inconsistantcies (Katie's fake looking pregnancy stomach, problems with the birth certificates, no photographs of the child, friends being turned away, etc., etc.) is because the child does not exist. I believe that all of this (the pregnancy) was a publicity stunt to promote Tom & Katie's movie careers. I can't believe no one has called them on it yet!

Posted at 8:25AM on Jul 10th 2006 by C

84. excuse me ,people....,scientology,his rules.his way,she must obey,did yu people really look at the pics when they were out in public,he was always out in front and pulling her behind him,and to read he always had a person who was associated with scientology with them,hummmmmmmm??follow my rules babe,so to say,nothing yr way.makes one wonder if she was allowed to show any pain in birth,as e,all women know it does produce some pain,but also there his way,his rules,and this birth certificate,hummmmm??can anyone say HIPPIA,HIPPIA.....???breach of confidentuality,someone messed up if ya asked me,but then her and let us all wonder why the last one didn;t make it ,perhaps the real woman got tired of his S----.I know i would,Amans not supposed to LOVE himself more than he does his wife.Just because he is a star.OH but yet he is so EDUCATED in birth control and meds for post partum BS he dosen;t have a womb or the body ,so what can we say. life goes on...........

Posted at 8:26AM on Jul 10th 2006 by young.cathy

85. I think your just looking for something that isnt there.
Leave them alone and let them enjoy there child.
Geeez get a life!!

Posted at 8:26AM on Jul 10th 2006 by B

86. If so many of you do not care about the personal lives of celebrities then why did you read this article? Seems hypocritical to me.

Posted at 8:26AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Billy

87. I for one do not care about Tom Cruise or any other person in Hollywood. To me they are all over paid actors.

The public gives them swollen heads One would think they are the only people on Earth that have babies.

Frankly my dear, I don't give damn

Posted at 8:27AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Dolores

88. I don't much care what entertainers do outside the spotlight. But to say Cruise deserves privacy after the Oprah & TODAY fiascos is ridiculous. These folks, Tom & Katie couldn't pose and blab enough before the baby was born and made the whole pregnancy a public spectacle. They deserve the scrutiny they're getting now. If you can't stand the heat...

Posted at 8:27AM on Jul 10th 2006 by Buz Whelan

89. I agree with everyone here that says to leave these people alone. We normal people who arent in the spotlight dont get harassed like they do. Come on now, then you want to know why these people with a great gift for acting wind up suing all of you one way or the other.

Posted at 8:28AM on Jul 10th 2006 by kathy

90. I really think that all Tom and Katie need to do is release one picture. I understand his need for privacy and to protect his children but babies change everyday, releasing one picture now and Suri could change by the time most of us see the picture. I think Toma nd Katie are just enjoying all this attention and milking it for as long as they can or the price is right. By then no one will care. Then we can all say "Suri, who?"

Posted at 8:28AM on Jul 10th 2006 by sharon

Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments