
L'Oreal's Worst Nightmare
Eva Longoria without make-up. Yikes!
The "Desperate Housewives" star hit the town sans foundation Sunday in Hollywood with pal Mario Lopez, Apparently, on this night, Eva went au natural.

Eva Longoria without make-up. Yikes!
The "Desperate Housewives" star hit the town sans foundation Sunday in Hollywood with pal Mario Lopez, Apparently, on this night, Eva went au natural.
76. Half of the women who are saying that she looks bad wish they looked as good as she w/o makeup. You guys are just jealous that you can't even go to the mailbox w/o slappin' on some FOUNDATION.
Posted at 11:06PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Shana C.
77. the reason she looks "bad" is because she dyed her hair n eyebrows blonde.... some people should never even try to go blonde.... shes hot with her dark hair so she should stay that way... her face (with OUT make up) is fine.
Posted at 11:14PM on Jul 10th 2006 by sophia
78. She's not ugly, but I feel a WHOLE lot better about myself just looking at that picture.
Posted at 11:19PM on Jul 10th 2006 by lillie
79. I think she looks good, healthy and wholesome. L'Oreal sucks anyway, they still torture animals to produce their products.
Posted at 11:24PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Cathy
80. She doesn't look bad...she doesn't have to wear a ton of makeup to be beautiful
Posted at 11:25PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Katie
81. Post 27..Gail...you can have teeth like hers if you have about $40,000 to spend on them.
Posted at 11:32PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Susan
82. shut the f**k up ... she looks fine
different, yes ... scary, hell no
Posted at 11:33PM on Jul 10th 2006 by john
83. More women should go more natural. You would think it would be fine to go out in public without all that caked on pancake cayola and spider lashes makeup. Once in a while is good. Save all that fake stuff for special occassions or a nite out or something. Women hide behind their makeup. Makeup by the way makes just about anyone look good. It is what is under all that stuff that women should be confortable with.
Posted at 11:34PM on Jul 10th 2006 by norma
84. She's absolutely beautiful. She doesn't even need makeup. It's so good to see a woman who's happy and secure being herself. And what a pretty self!
Posted at 11:35PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Sea
85. WOW! Now I know all the celebs out there aren't all that and get lots of make up on their faces to look better.. they make them look perfect but I always thought Eva was a beautiful woman and its not that she's ugly without make up but wow! LOL she isn't attracitve as I thought.. just goes to show no celeb is all that.. LOL
Posted at 11:36PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Samantha
86. ACtually, I don't think that's a mustache, but a poorly lighted photo. She really doesn't look that bad, just NORMAL, which we are not accustomed to seeing. She actually looks a lot younger without all the paint!
Posted at 11:45PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Monica
87. I think its the lighting too cause if you look at the other two photos its not even there.. she doesn't have hair there @@ lol.. she looks fine.. i think its the hair im not liking. She's still pretty but still goes to show.. none of them celebs are all that. .
Posted at 11:48PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Samantha
88. Without makeup? I think she looks great. I hate Hollywood, where most everyone takes Botox, hello, it's toxic! LMAO!
Posted at 11:51PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Sue
89. She's awesome! She has beautiful bone structure, and she looks great without make-up. I love seeing celebrities without make-up. It makes me think that they are rPeal. I know I am lying to myself. :-
Posted at 11:54PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Sue
90. She doesn't look completely awful, but that just goes to show: the public shouldn't be worshipping the way celebs look on some dumb beauty magazine. It is not a surprise for me, anways. I never found her beautiful with make-up on, and I already speculated she didn't look all that great without make-up.
Posted at 11:56PM on Jul 10th 2006 by Hermila