EXCLUSIVE: Cruise/Shields' Births -- New Twist

UPDATE: St. John's Hospital still has not called back, but we may have figured out what is going on here. It seems as if the nurses entered the license number of the doctors who delivered the children. Doctors are registered with the Medical Board, not the Nursing Board. Reps from two other hospitals -- UCLA and St. Joseph's -- told TMZ the box for "License Number" should have the nurse's license, not the doctor's.

A rep from L.A. County Vital Records, the agency where birth certificates are filed, confirmed to TMZ that the "License Number" should be the nurse's, not the doctor's.

The same nurse who signed the birth certificate for Tom Cruise's daughter Suri also signed the birth certificate for Brooke Shields' daughter Grier, but there's an interesting discrepancy.

Suri and Grier's birthcertificates side by side

Both babies were born on April 18 at St. John's Hospital in Santa Monica. Anne Heffernan is the registered nurse who signed both birth certificates. As TMZ reported Monday, Heffernan, who never saw Suri, signed her birth certificate. A hospital rep says Heffernan is authorized to sign when a doctor is not available.

On the Suri Cruise certificate, Heffernan's license number is G48079. On the Grier Henchy certificate, Heffernan's license number is different -- G068399. TMZ checked with the California Board of Registered Nursing and we were told Heffernan's license number didn't match either of the birth certificates. A Board rep told TMZ Hefferman's license number is 317058.

And it gets more interesting. The Board of Registered Nursing told TMZ the license number on Grier's certificate comes back to a Dorothy Rork. The license number on Suri's birth certificate is a mystery. There is no name attached to that license number.

By the way, unlike Suri's birth certificate, Brooke Shields signed the one for her daughter. Someone listed as "Friend" signed the certificate for Suri.

Also, the hospital's policy is to file birth certificates with L.A. County within 10 days of birth. In the case of Suri, it took 20 days to file, in part because the "friend" didn't sign for 16 days. In Grier's case, Brooke herself signed two days after her birth and the certificate was filed nine days after the baby was born.

TMZ placed multiple calls to St. John's. So far, no comment.

Related Link
EXCLUSIVE: Suri Cruise Birth Certificate

H-Wood: The Flurry Over Suri



Tags: birth certificate tom katie cruise holmes brooke suri grier, BirthCertificateTomKatieCruiseHolmesBrookeSuriGrier

Reader Comments

(Page 6 of 38) Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

76. Tom never even introduced his adopted children, Isabella and Conner to the public until 3 years after they had been adopted. I do find it strange that supposedly friends haven't seen the baby but I do believe Kate definetely delivered a baby--a human baby. I agree with a lot of the previous comments, the media just needs to allow Kate and Tom to introduce the baby at a time this is comfortable to them or offer more money since that has been one reason given that the baby's pictures haven't been sold to a mag. When did a picture of a baby become such a media frenzy anyway?!?

Posted at 5:08PM on Jul 11th 2006 by brandi

77. Ok get over it everyone. As a mom of 6 kids I know she was definitely pregnant.
If she had the baby in Feb then it will be the child of Chris Klein, That would be awesome as he is so much better looking than Tom Cruise can ever be. And if she gave birth in April, then maybe it is Tom's but who in the right mind would let someone signed a birth certificate, cause as all moms know it can only be the father or mother of the child. No nurse or a friend has authority to sign a "LEGAL" document. So the one they are showing is definitely fake and if she was dead, then that is public record and can be found on the social security death index. Don't worry The truth will come out soon.

Posted at 5:09PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Sherri

78. I will admit that I think Tom Cruise has gone off the deep end lately and feels as if he is more educated in the field of psychiatry and has come across as the biggest know it all and has a huge ego. (Can you tell he isn't my favorite person?)
However, I still would give them both a break and just let them enjoy their new baby in peace. When I had my first child I didn't go out much the first couple of months because I was still getting the hang of becoming a new mom and I was so exhausted from getting little sleep and nursing every 2 hours that I just didn't feel like doing anything but taking care of my new baby. So unless we hear otherwise it's best to just let them be the new parents that they are.

Posted at 5:09PM on Jul 11th 2006 by K.BELL

79. Why don't you leave these poor people alone?

Posted at 5:10PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Suri Cruise

80. I wouldn't usually even comment on something as asinine as this subject... but I am compelled to address this stupidity. Think about it... this time is no different from when Tom and Nicole adopted. They chose to shield their children from the media and the general public. Tom and Katie have chosen the same path. They have zero obligation to parade their private lives and their baby's identity/condition/situation. This froth is just that; froth and no substance. FORGET IT!

Posted at 5:10PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Pamela Moldan

81. Who the heck cares!!! Get a life TMZ or whatever the heck your called! Jeez, I cant believe there are people that bored with life that they have to worry about stuff they obviously are making up. Cant you people find something better to question and article over? Get a life!

Posted at 5:11PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Michele

82. Its just so much more important things in life.stop stop wasting your time.
read a book or something.It is their business.things all will come out it do time.

Posted at 5:11PM on Jul 11th 2006 by yolanda

83. I am sick of hearing about Tom and feel sorry for poor Katie ,who is totally changing her life for him. Does anybody wonder why he and Nicole never had children of their own. No children with first wife either. I think they are keeping the baby hidden until she starts to look like Katie, because she doesn't look like Tom at all. Maybe Tom isn't the biological father. You can't hide that mouth and nose. We would understand and admire him for it, but it is better for his career if the world thinks it's his. Sad, his light used to shine so bright. I hope Katie's parents will be there for her.

Posted at 5:12PM on Jul 11th 2006 by debbie

84. 14. I am a labor and delivery nurse. What you are referring to as possible license numbers appear more like medical record numbers, in which case they should be different for each baby. At the hospital I work at, medical record numbers start with "G0" followed by a set of numbers. People are reading too much into this. Let these people be. Must one try to be suspicious of everything? There are more important things to concern ourselves with in this world....

Posted at 4:23PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Jean

Good word Jean. I clicked on the link to get here as if there was some "shocking" news. It's no news in fact. What the article calls "interesting" is anything but. Stupid me I guess for even wasting the time to check it out but like watching a car wreck sometimes it's hard to look away from the sadness of folks investing time and thought into people's lives that have nothing to do with their own and that is all pretty meaningless.

Posted at 5:12PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Dave

85. Tom cruise has fallen off the nut tree....

NO BABY!!!!

Posted at 5:13PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Rachel

86. this is so ridiculous, there are more important things in the world to get to the bottom of like how do we feed and help the people who are starving in Darfour, how do we get ourselves out of Iraq before another young person is killed, how do we get the mess from Katrina cleaned up and get the country and it's economy back on its feet......please TMZ STOPPPPPPPPPPP

Posted at 5:13PM on Jul 11th 2006 by nanci

87. What I don't get is how no one noticed that for Tom Cruise's name is WRONG ON THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. His full name is Thomas (First) Cruise (Middle) MAPOTHER (LAST). They have him listed as Thomas Cruise!

HELLO?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Posted at 5:14PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Me

88. Get a life! Who Cares? There are more important things in the world like the Apocalypse!!! /sarcasm

Posted at 5:14PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Mindless OSA Drone

89. What I don't get is how no one noticed that for Tom Cruise's name is WRONG ON THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. His full name is Thomas (First) Cruise (Middle) MAPOTHER (LAST). They have him listed as Thomas Cruise!

HELLO?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Posted at 5:14PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Me

90. okay people,listen up,i used to work in ob and have seen many of births.Katie looked prego and she probably was.But lets face it not every baby that is born is beautiful at birth,Now i've seen some real pittiful babies,One even looked like a rat.So saying that, In my opinion i think mss Katie and her baby ,are being lead to do as mr Cruise wants.I really don;t think it;s going to be a really wonderful life as she thought,or it could be now that she has had HIS baby he rules.We don;t know the circumstances,but one would wonder if her parents are allowed to see her and the babyor to even be with her,hopefully so, But i have this strange feeling that he is overruling her life with the scientology thing,and now she is having to obey. I bet mrs x-cruise could enlighten us all ,life with him might have been good at first ,but something went wrong.And he was supposed to be ALL THAT, Ladies even the best looking men, have their quirks and are not always a womans dream.And the sun dosen;t shine on the same dogs butt every day. So we have to just wait and hope they are being good parents, Remember this is his first baby as well as hers ,his other two had already been born and we're not babies,

Posted at 5:14PM on Jul 11th 2006 by frances

Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments