Katie To Us: "Suri's Doing Great!"

Katie Holmes sought to quell the controversy surrounding her invisible baby, telling Us Weekly, "Suri's doing great!"

The cover of Us magazine
Katie was snapped by the weekly during a vacation in Telluride, Colo., strolling down the street with a friend and a cappuccino. Neither fiancé Tom Cruise -- nor, significantly, baby Suri -- were anywhere to be found.



Katie Holmes walks with friend
Us, in a three-page spread, says a couple of Telluride locals have reported Suri spottings, including a clerk at a natural-goods store, who said Suri is "funny looking."
Katie Holmes enjoys a hot beverage
With Suri question marks far from resolved -- even her birth certificate is a mystery -- brace yourself for a new TomKat obsession: Us now speculates that the 27-year-old Katie could be pregnant again. The issue is on newsstands this week.

Reader Comments

(Page 43 of 43) Previous 15 Comments

631. To post 329 (Nicky)! I have to laugh at your comment. You have the nerve to mention spell check when 1) you spelled funny, fuuny and 2) Tom and Katie aren't even married yet as you state they are. Come on, get it together. If you have a comment make it, if you're just going to put other people down then honestly, keep it to yourself!

Posted at 2:13PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Kim

632. Oh how I long for the dorky days of Dawson's Creek and Tom being married to an adult.

Posted at 4:15PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Shellster

633. I love how obsessed we are about Katie and Tom when we are at war at 2, possibly soon 3, locations in the world. Gotta love the US of A!

Posted at 7:39PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Katie De La Cruz

634. DOES ANYBODY REALLY BELIEVE THERE IS A BABY SURI?

Posted at 10:16PM on Jul 17th 2006 by THE DIVINE MS N

635. I agree w/ # 5's comment leave them alone.

Posted at 11:25PM on Jul 17th 2006 by anna

636. Let's do the prequel, shall: Mimi Rogers made comments about Tom's fertility issues when they divorced a million years ago. Tom and Nicole never have pregnancies, but ADOPT two kids, THEN she gets pregnant and he leaves her...and there were widespread rumors that he was not the father, ...which makes sense. SO, we have Mimi, who has no fertility issues, and we will wait and see on Nicole. Now Tom has a baby ON THE SAME DAY AS BROOKE SHIELDS IN THE SAME HOSPITAL... and the child "looks funny"???
20 to 1.....there IS no Suri...BUT if there is, he isn't the father. IT is a Michael Jackson job. Oh yes... and now TOm wants to buy Neverland. hmmmmmmm.

Posted at 9:47AM on Jul 18th 2006 by Carol

637. OMG,
This is ridiculous, and slightly annoying.
What is it with the press and idiots who have too much time on their hands? Do they have some ridiculous need to create problems for celebrities to be able to occupy their time? THEY JUST HAD A BABY!!!! For goodness sake people, leave them alone.... maybe after seeing the presses' negative response to first time mom Britney Spears they decided to lay low?... Katie is really young after all, and maybe she just wants to enjoy the small amount of privacy for her and her family that she's hardly gotten since she began 'Dawson's Creek'. And by the way, This clerk sounds completely spiteful for saying that about ANYBODY'S baby, even if it is a celebrity. Why can't anyone just leave them alone?

Posted at 2:49PM on Jul 26th 2006 by Lily

638. Baby Suri was found dead in her crib 2 weeks ago. Cruise is the top suspect now in the case. a case that has been kept under close security w/o any leaks to the press. bought & paid for by katie holmes. holmes has now been seen at script reads as she is trying to keep her mind off what has happened. cruise has been under an un-official house arrest. the garbage cans at the cruise/holmes house was loaded with lots of unused diapers, baby food jars & formula

Posted at 6:11AM on Jul 29th 2006 by lars campbell

639. Wow, as I read down through these comments I just can't believe some of you people. You guys are no better than the paparazzi crawling up Tom and Katie's butts on a daily basis. Cruel, closeminded losers is what you are. So what if they don't want to put their new born child under all the lights of the world. Think about it, them being together is constent press time for the both of them. The baby shouldn't have to be put through all of that, they are just being good parents trying to protect there baby from all the srutiny and press. Why should they have to put her on the market and have pictures of her posted all over the world, with this comment and that that are completely false. Let them have their privacy it's their business not yours, and their decision to not share her with the rest of the world is not going to take anything away from you so forget about it. Like someone said in here earlier their are a lot more important things going on in the world. Things we all should be paying attention to and protecting our selves from. That's what is wrong with the world these days everybody is too busy butting their noses into everybody else's lives and not paying enough attention to their own. Tom and Katie as parents have every right to protect there baby from the hungry paparazzi. Wouldn't you want to do the same if you were in the limelight like them????

Posted at 2:18PM on Aug 7th 2006 by Annoyed with critical people

Previous 15 Comments