Home : Tom & Katie : Katie To Us: "Suri's Doing Great!"

Katie To Us: "Suri's Doing Great!"

Posted Jul 11th 2006 7:30PM by TMZ Staff

Katie Holmes sought to quell the controversy surrounding her invisible baby, telling Us Weekly, "Suri's doing great!"

The cover of Us magazine
Katie was snapped by the weekly during a vacation in Telluride, Colo., strolling down the street with a friend and a cappuccino. Neither fiancé Tom Cruise -- nor, significantly, baby Suri -- were anywhere to be found.



Katie Holmes walks with friend
Us, in a three-page spread, says a couple of Telluride locals have reported Suri spottings, including a clerk at a natural-goods store, who said Suri is "funny looking."
Katie Holmes enjoys a hot beverage
With Suri question marks far from resolved -- even her birth certificate is a mystery -- brace yourself for a new TomKat obsession: Us now speculates that the 27-year-old Katie could be pregnant again. The issue is on newsstands this week.

Comments [639]
SHARE |
4ie6

Reader Comments

(Page 7 of 43) Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

91. Who Cares!!!!!!!!!!
This relationship will never last, Katie will get tired of Tom's weirdness and move on. She is young and I would bet she misses normal life.
Who cares what the baby looks like, where the baby is? I feel bad for Katie she is so young and being treated like a child by Tom not an equal.
Mark my words she will get fed up and it will not last.

Posted at 9:03AM on Jul 12th 2006 by TJ

92. Stop the bashing....The parents of little Suri are just being protective parents. Why should they flash the baby's picture all over the internet or newspapers. There is not one baby that is ugly or funny looking to me. They are all individuals & their looks are their very own. The parent are not interested in making money off the baby's picture like some other stars. Give me a break & find something else to bash...like the price of gas or the war in Iraq. Remember God loves you....

Posted at 9:05AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Grandmother

93. I think it is great that they are trying to keep the baby away from the media. How would you like it if you had a camera in your face 24/7. They are people just as we are. I don't know what there is such a big deal and why people think there is something up cause they want PRIVACY.

Posted at 9:05AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Missy

94. Why can't everyone just leave Katie alone? Let her and the baby try to lead some kind of a normal life.

Posted at 9:06AM on Jul 12th 2006 by linda

95. LEAVE THEM ALONE PEOPLE...THEY ARE HUMAN...THEY HAVE A NEW BABY TOGETHER...WOULD YOU WANT THE WORLD GAWKING AT YOUR CHILD??? WHY SHOULD THEY BRING SURI INTO THE SPOTLIGHT AND PUT HER AT RISK TO ALL SORTS OF THINGS FROM ILLNESS TO WHO KNOWS WHAT...LET THEM LIVE THEIR LIVES..WE DO NOT OWN THEM BECAUSE WE SEE THEM IN THE MOVIES....GET A LIFE AND TEND TO YOUR OWN CHILDREN WHO ARE DOING WHAT RIGHT NOW ????????

Posted at 9:07AM on Jul 12th 2006 by M.P.

96. Not all babies are ugly. There are some very beautiful ones--take a look around. It's odd that these 2 are hiding something. tom jumped for joy over their relationship and the fact that they "conceived" yet he is hiding the child---something isn't adding up. As a mother Katie should be wanting to show her newborn---especially given it's a girl! Katie is young and has been brainwashed by that monster. What a shame. Someday soon she will see the light and the truth will all come out.

Posted at 9:07AM on Jul 12th 2006 by jen

97. I think Tom is eating up all the attention this is gaining. His baby is no more important than my grandchild that will be born in November. The only difference is her parents are not famous, but to me she will be much more beautiful than anyone else's baby. As for Tom, he has always been weird and I pray their little baby doesn't take after him. I don't know much about his wife except she is young and Tom probably tells her what to do and how and when to do it. When she matures, she will probably leave him like Nicole did.

Posted at 9:07AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Janice

98. Although I find this entire situation quite unusual, I'd think it would be hard for celebrities to cover up a baby that doesn't exist. There are a lot of assistants and family members (especially Tom's) in their lives, and if there was no baby, by now someone would have let it slip. Additionally, I would think Katie's parents who are so vocal about their discontent for the relationship, would have outed them if a baby did not truly exist. That being said, I think it is possible that the child is not Tom's and from a donor given what we know about his past history with two execs who did not have biological children but can, apparently, have them. Maybe they are trying to figure out how to explain the child's blond/red hair or some other anomaly that makes it clear the child is not his. On the other hand maybe they are just being good parents. It's their first, and I can totally see him being WAY overprotective. As for Katie, I hope she can snap out of it and get the hell away from this freak for her and the child's own good!

Posted at 9:07AM on Jul 12th 2006 by KDG

99. people, people, give them some time. i agree with alcorr, i mean why the heck would they expose their newborn baby to the paparazzi and all that? it's logical thinking THE DAMN PHOTOGRAPHERS ARE EVERYWHEREEEEE! i mean like someone said before, when tom was married to nicole, they didnt even show their ADOPTED children until they were in grade school =/
give them some time.

Posted at 9:08AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Verena

100. So what if we haven't seen their baby? I'm no celebrity, but I kept both of my children inside our home until they were about 2-3 months old, simply to protect them from harsh weather (hot summers both times) and germs in those first precious few months.
To Elena (#4 post); If the media are "animals" and the paparazzi are "rabid dogs", then why are you reading the product they are selling and supporting them? They get their power from the public (you and the rest of us).
I have no interest in seeing this baby, but I am definitely entertained by this ridiculous question regarding the existence of Suri. What difference does it really make either way? Her existence would prove that Tom Cruise isn't gay?! ha ha That's a good one.

Posted at 9:09AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Julia

101. Get a life people...how gives a crap!!!

Posted at 9:10AM on Jul 12th 2006 by CC

102. Tom couldn't get out of the spotlight when he and Katie started dating. He was all over the media....ALL OVER. Then suddenly he's quiet about his personal life? Very suspicious to me too. What's wrong with you Katie? Run child, run!!!

Posted at 9:11AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Erin

103. I`ve been thinking maybe the baby looks more like Chris Kline then Tom Cruise. How could she engaged and madly in love with one man and then someone else a week later.

Posted at 9:11AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Nana Montesinos

104. I'll bet that lady who made that comment is full of %&*# . She just said that to get another rumor started. If Tom cannot have children , that is none of my business. It's all hollywood hype.

Posted at 9:12AM on Jul 12th 2006 by SANDRA MALTBY

105. Oh, please. Let's see....so far he's been married to Mimi Rodgers (no kids) Nicole Kidman (2 adopted children) I don't think either of those women are too vain to get pregnant and have their own children. There is no baby.What is Tom trying to prove? He's a great actor and loved by his fans, This whole TomKat thing reminds me of Lisa Marie and Michael Jackson, strange. With so many children in the world who need good homes, why not just adopt?

Posted at 9:13AM on Jul 12th 2006 by linda

Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments