Celebrity Justice
Lawsuit Over "Pirates of the Caribbean"

Pirates of the CaribbeanA Hollywood screenwriter is suing pretty much everyone involved with "Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl," the first installment of the now record-breaking "Pirates" series.

Royce Mathew claims in the 80s and 90s, he "created and wrote a number of original works including drawings, screenplays, outlines, blueprints, storyboards and other original materials...which he generally entitled "SNPM," standing for 'Super Natural Pirate Movie.'"

According to the lawsuit, obtained by TMZ and filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, Royce alleges he created "various drawings depicting his pirate ship, which he named the Black Pearl, and an original design for a 'medallion,' both of which are are central elements of his screenplay." Royce says he registered the drawings and his screenplay with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Royce says the screenplay contained a blacksmith/swordsman named Will Turner, an eccentric pirate captain and a unique cursed crew whose curse was revealed only in the moonlight. Royce claims the daughter of a British governor named Elizabeth falls in love with Will Turner. In "Pirates of the Caribbean," Orlando Bloom plays Will Turner and Keira Knightley plays Elizabeth Swann, who falls in love with Will Turner.



In the lawsuit, Royce says he shopped his materials between 1991 through 1995 to various defendants, both directly and through the William Morris Agency and Creative Artist Agency. Royce claims his materials were rejected and then the first "Pirates of the Caribbean" was created, allegedly using his work as a blueprint.

The first "Pirates" movie raked in $655 million worldwide.

Royce is suing, among others, The Walt Disney Company, Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Touchstone Home Video, Jerry Bruckheimer, Inc., and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, Inc. He is asking for unspecified damages and an injunction prohibiting the defendants from publicly displaying the movie.

Royce is also asking that all copies of "Pirates" that the defendants control be impounded.

Although the lawsuit does not mention the two "Pirates" sequels, it does ask the judge to issue an injunction against the first "Pirates" and "other infringing works."

A Disney spokewoman says the suit "has no merit."

Click here to see the documents.

Tags: johnny depp, JohnnyDepp, keira knightley, KeiraKnightley, orlando bloom, OrlandoBloom, pirates of the caribbean, PiratesOfTheCaribbean

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 3) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. omg this guy is a nutcase hes not telling the truth r u all blind!!!
if u ask me, i would tell u he is lying bc y wouldnt he have sued earlier!!!
pirates #1 has been out for 3 years now!!!
I LOVE U JOHNNY DEPP!!!
IM YOUR BIGGEST FAN!!!
XOXO!

Posted at 4:11PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Hannah

17. Interesting that he waited three years to file a complaint. It would have been more plausible if he had jumped on it the second the first one came out. Our legal system may be slow, but three years? Come on. Do you really believe in this day and age allegations of that magnitude could be kept under wraps for so long? Also, I think that the facts of his screenplay are exact to a fault. If the storyline was in fact stolen as he alleges I have a hard time believing that ANY studio would make it that blatant. Me thinks a pirate is in the mist and his name be Royce.

Posted at 4:46PM on Jul 11th 2006 by deebee

18. Don't glibly dismiss this guy as a gold-digger. While these things happen infrequently, if he has dated proof that he registered his materials and showed them to Disney reps prior to the start of pre-production he may have reason to feel cheated and may be owed real compensation. As for the timing, it takes a while simply to identify all the defendants and prepare a suit - even longer to properly cover all your bases if you're going up against a large consortium of well-financed and well-prepared defendants with a reputation for legal prowess.

As for legal reform in which the loser pays all legal fees for both sides, what kind of chance would you give a wronged person that has to go up against Wal*Mart or GM? These companies can afford to put people on a suit full-time for years, and if you think that Disney doesn't proactively protect its interests in court, you're mistaken. These companies SHOULD vigorously defend their properties, but they should also ensure that they have rightly and legally created or purchased their material.

Posted at 4:52PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Andy

19. This guy registered in Dec 03, The movie came out in June 03. little late to Copyright it?

http://www.copyright.gov/records/cohm.html
PA-1-204-748

Posted at 6:31PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Richard

20. Wasn't his registration though after pirates was already released?

Posted at 7:25PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Robert Laird

21. I agree with Andy in the sense that the little people are the ones to get stepped on when it comes to lawsuits. And it's not just the movie studios but any organization that can afford to have high priced attorneys on retainer year round. I also wouldn't put it past these same organizations to circument issues to the detrement of the general public. However, the ax can swing the other way as well and I am certain that there are grifters out there looking for the big score, especially if the can find any attorney with little or no scruples. In this case, I am suspicious of the motivation because of these questions:
1. The hype began 1 year before the movie was even released. It was all over the internet. It was made common knowledge before the movie came out. Why didn't he sanction a cease and desist then? Why wait three years?
2. The material is copywrited. Cool. Then why would Disney knowingly and willingly allow themselves to be caught with their hands in the cookie jar? Why would they blatantly plagarize and hope to get away with it?
3. Has anyone seen the original script? Do we know for sure that it was stolen and not altered?
Go figure. Spent too much time on this.

Posted at 7:29PM on Jul 11th 2006 by deebee

22. Wat a jackass! A movie that is making this much movie is sure 2 hav some people sueing it. Everybody wants a piece of the money and that guy is obviously desperate.

Posted at 9:22PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Mrs Sparrow

23. It's very suspicious, if you actually go and look up his "registrations" at the United States Copyright office. The pirates stuff was all registered in 12/2005, NOT back when the movie was made. The claims for creation date are earlier. There are 2 entries back in 2003 for "POC" screenplays, but it just says POC, not Pirates of the Caribbean.

http://www.copyright.gov/records/cohm.html

Do a search there on Royce Mathew and see what you get, then tell me how ironclad his case looks. Note that the articles even say he registered all this stuff, but not when he registered it. I'm no lawyer, but the case smells to me, considering there were two other writers who worked on Pirates scripts who aren't even named in the suit.

Posted at 11:16PM on Jul 11th 2006 by KeithGap

24. Disney has had the pirates ride, which is what the movie was based off of, ever since 1966. This guy saw how much the movie made, came up with some years to make his story seem plausable, then submitted his "ideas" to the copyright office. If anything, Disney should be the ones suing him for copyright infringement.

Posted at 8:55AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Joe

25. "Unless he has proof of the DATES that he created all his "images" and "ideas" this lawsuit won't go far. If he seriously had this idea first, don't you think he would have tried suing as soon as the first movie was advertised? The "idea" of the movie and "images" were in those previews - the ship, gold coin. I think if he wasn't just trying to get money out of this he would have taken action long ago."


Well if he did get a copyright done it will have the date listed. So that is not hard to prove. But it does not surprise me Hollywood and the Music industry have stolen from people for DECADES.

And now they cry foul because of P2P programs. So I dont fell sorry for Disney at all.

Posted at 6:38PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Big Joe Krash

26. hey there

thanks for the link to the copyright website whoever posted that...very helpful.

i went and looked at his registrations...if he's legit, i understand what he's going through, cause, i am also a writer, and i would be royally pissed if anyone did that to me (stole my work).

then again, very strange, all his stuff 'created' in 1994, 1991, etc etc, but all the copyrights were issued in 2005...why didnt he just copyright them back then? if they werent copyrighted before the movie was made, he has absolutely no case, and disney can probably turn around and sue HIM for stealing their work! lol. sounds backwards, but regardless of whether or not they stole his work, the question is, did he copyright it before or after the movie started being made?

Posted at 7:12PM on Jul 12th 2006 by evanostrand

27. Hmm, let's think about this. If I were going to steal a story, I think I might change a few names. If this guy is telling the truth that he came up with these characters, such as Will Tunner and Elizabeth, I really don't think Disney would have been stupid enough to keep the same names! Plus when Depp took the part Disney reps, were worried about the way he was playing the role, he was too off the wall, but according to this guy it was always so, yet Depp said it was the way he made it. And as far as the name of the ship anyone ever hear of the real Caribean pirate Edward England, who had two ships one the Pearl, and the other known as the Black Pearl. If this guy was worried about his story getting out he should have done the poor man's copyright and mailed it to himself when he had a chance!

Posted at 9:26PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Jenn

28. You refer to Royce Mathew as a "Hollywood screenwriter." There is no Royce Mathew in the Writers Guild of America, which means he's not a professional working screenwriter. He's an amateur. A wannabe.

Please be more accurate in the future. When you paint a nutball like Royce Mathew as "a Hollywood screenwriter," you demean those who are actually real, hardworking Hollywood screenwriters.

Posted at 5:20PM on Jul 13th 2006 by A Real Hollywood Screenwriter

29. What I find interesting is that when he licensed his material back in the 90's the title was only POC- in wasn't until 12/03 that he licensed the material with the official title "Pirates of the Caribbean"- 6 months AFTER the movie came out. I'm pretty sure that Disney must have some kind of registered trademark on thie name. Also, if you look at the what he submitted for copywrite, as far as I can ascertain it was only for written material. It doesn't look like any actual drawings were included, unless of course it was part of the original package, (Which I doubt)

Thanks for the copywrite posting by the way

Posted at 12:38PM on Jul 14th 2006 by deebee

30. What a ASS he don't need to sue the Pirates of the Corribean movie. I think i'm speeking for most of the people here. That all this guy wants is to make money. He just wants to start trouble for them. Both of the Corribean movies is DAMN good.So screw him!!!

Posted at 12:21AM on Jul 15th 2006 by Summer Daniels

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments