Gossip & Rumors
The Flurry Over Suri

Tom CruiseWhere the heck is Suri Cruise?  My cynical opinion -- Tom wants to out do Brad.

So here's my theory.  Brad and Angelina got around $4 mil for the first pics of Shiloh, which they donated to charity.  The word on the street is that Tom and Katie couldn't get more than $3 million for Suri pics.  When you're as big as Tom Cruise, the only place to go is down.  He was the biggest star in the world for a long time, loved by all.  Now he's neither the biggest nor loved that much.

So forget about the conspiracy theories.  People just weren't as into Suri pics as Shiloh pics, and it probably drove Tom nuts.  But wait -- there's a solution.  Create a mystery and the world will go crazy.  That's exactly what I think is going on.  If people start questioning if this baby really exists, the pictures automatically become more valuable.  If he gets more than $4 mil, he beats Brad.  I'm guessing if that happens, the money goes to Scientology, which could make the whole plan backfire.

In this town, stars make their own luck.  Until recently, the Cruise machine was the master of managed publicity.   I think this could be an attempt to re-capture some good ol' glory days.



Filed under: Gossip/Rumors, Movies, Wacky & Weird, Baby Watch, Kids, Tom & Katie


Tags: Katie Holmes, KatieHolmes, Tom Cruise, TomCruise

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 6) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Is there ANYONE who has actually seen the Cruise baby other than the family?

Posted at 7:06PM on Jul 11th 2006 by kit

2. DOES ANYBODY WITH AN I.Q. OVER 12 REALLY CARE?????

Posted at 7:26PM on Jul 11th 2006 by JOAN TORDO

3. DOES ANYONE WITH AN I.Q OVER 12 REALLY CARE?????

Posted at 7:27PM on Jul 11th 2006 by JOAN TORDO

4. 100% correct, again.


Oh, and "JOAN TORDO" obviously you do since you are/were here. If you really did not care, you would have never gone to tmz.com, gone to the article and especially commented on it. Stupid cynical hypocrat.

Posted at 7:30PM on Jul 11th 2006 by meg

5. i dont care about this baby suri or tom. he's a nut!!!! i would not buy a people or any mag of suri, and dont buy nothing that has to do with tom cruise on it. i like katie and hope she don't not marry that nut. if they break up i would want to read about that. t.p. in texas

Posted at 7:54PM on Jul 11th 2006 by tammy

6. harvey, Tom don't want to release a pic, he never did

TOM CRUISE NEVER EXPLOITED HIS KIDS AND SOLD THEM LIKE EX WIFE KIDMAN WITH CONNOR IN 2002

HE NEVER DID A SINGLE COMMERCIAL IN HIS CARRER


YOU ARE JUST FEELING TOO CURIOUS AND IN LACK OF TOMKAT BASHING

FUCK YOU ALL HATERS

HATERS + LOSERS

Posted at 8:01PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Ann

7. I'm sure when they are ready to let people see Suri, we will see her. Maybe there is some medical issue that they would rather no one know about just yet. Just wait and see.

Posted at 8:10PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Erika Callahan

8. He didnt show off his other kids either. It is really strange though, they did everything in their power to get as much media attention that they could. She even went shoe (not baby) shopping every day for weeks just to be sure he cameras didnt forget her.

Posted at 10:02PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Amy

9. Tom should wait to show the pic's. I want to see them but the baby should be older before being famuse and everything.

Posted at 10:36PM on Jul 11th 2006 by nick

10. honestly, i bet suri is just fugly, so they're hiding her...

Posted at 10:37PM on Jul 11th 2006 by l*

11. Maybe Suri looks just like Chris Kline, her boyfriend of 5 years that she broke up with right before Tom. Has anyone else noticed that in every picture of the two of them together Tom has her by the arm and ALWAYS in front of her as if she isn't good enough to walk by his side?

Posted at 10:50PM on Jul 11th 2006 by Robin

12. I hate to admit it, but I think you are right and it's a brilliant ploy...well done!

Posted at 10:55PM on Jul 11th 2006 by A Shields

13. I agree with the analysis, and was thinking the same thing myself. Tomkat ATTEMPTED to sell the baby pics, were offered LESS than Brangelina pics, and withdrew. I think it is either this scenario (likely), the baby is less than desirable or the baby was born of a different race to the surprise of Tom. Anyway... isn't he infertile? hmmmm

Posted at 11:09PM on Jul 11th 2006 by SHANNON MCCOY

14. DOES ANYONE KNOW WHO IS TOM CRUISE'S BABY'S FATHER IS??? HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND MY QUESTION. MY QUESTION IS AN ANSWER IN ITSELF. TOM MAY HAVE RECEIVED ADVICE FROM MICHAEL JACKSON ON FATHERING. IM SORRY TOM BUT YOU REALLY OUGHT TO STRAIGHTEN UP AND KEEP YOUR BIG MOUTH SHUT. YOUR "TOP GUN" DAYS ARE OVER. BY THE WAY, MAYBE HERB IS THE FATHER.

Posted at 12:01AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Misty

15. I heard along time ago that tom cruise left his first wife nichole kidman because she came up pregnant and he was sterile and could not possibly be the father, than she lost the baby but he still divorced her. If he is sterile he could not be the father of suri.

Posted at 2:00AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Tammy

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments