Gossip & Rumors
The Flurry Over Suri

Tom CruiseWhere the heck is Suri Cruise? My cynical opinion -- Tom wants to out do Brad.

So here's my theory. Brad and Angelina got around $4 mil for the first pics of Shiloh, which they donated to charity. The word on the street is that Tom and Katie couldn't get more than $3 million for Suri pics. When you're as big as Tom Cruise, the only place to go is down. He was the biggest star in the world for a long time, loved by all. Now he's neither the biggest nor loved that much.

So forget about the conspiracy theories. People just weren't as into Suri pics as Shiloh pics, and it probably drove Tom nuts. But wait -- there's a solution. Create a mystery and the world will go crazy. That's exactly what I think is going on. If people start questioning if this baby really exists, the pictures automatically become more valuable. If he gets more than $4 mil, he beats Brad. I'm guessing if that happens, the money goes to Scientology, which could make the whole plan backfire.

In this town, stars make their own luck. Until recently, the Cruise machine was the master of managed publicity. I think this could be an attempt to re-capture some good ol' glory days.



Tags: Katie Holmes, KatieHolmes, Tom Cruise, TomCruise

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 6) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. Tom and Katie, are a new couple that are protecting thier baby and themselves from to much public attention and I can't blame them, people are sometimes very cruel.

Posted at 8:27AM on Jul 12th 2006 by kim ross

17. Leave them alone, they are real people.
I've always been a big fan of Tom Cruise and still am! So what if they aren't running round to let people take pictures of the baby, I applaud them for that. Maybe they want some private family time, while they can get it!

I wish them all the best!

Posted at 11:09AM on Jul 12th 2006 by mimi

18. I do get a jolly out of the folks that say they don't care and get a life and Yet they are here........

Posted at 11:13AM on Jul 12th 2006 by Daley Ellen

19. I read another recent article that a store clerk in Colorado saw the baby (Suri) said she is "funny looking".

Posted at 12:26PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Tracey

20. Tom is just so full of himself that he wants to get as much limelight as possible. I think Katie is just a pawn in his game of life. I think he isn't the father of Suri and it is visible in her looks and that would hurt his image of himself. Katie got caught up in a whirlwind dream and probably wishes she was not in all of this. And yes Tom does "drag her rather than walking side by side with him. They publicly broadcast their relationship and pregnancy and were "so happy" well why not marry and show of the offspring ?????????

Posted at 12:46PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Connie

21. Wow! Poor kid...all of this judgement on her appearance and health before she's ever even been seen. What a legacy...to find out that you were thought to be "fugly" and "funny looking," possibly deformed, unhealthy and even bastardized....just because her parents are not putting her on public display. All of you out there should be ashamed of yourselves.

Posted at 12:48PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Alexia Z

22. Yes....I thought there was a reason why Nicole & Tom adopted instead of having their own children, that they couldn't have kids...when I 1st heard about Katie I thought that was weird

Posted at 1:05PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Brandie

23. Well now. Maybe they are trying to live out of the lime light and do the family bond thing. Doubtful...Maybe it has something to do with the strain the paparazi puts on new moms and dads.

Katie is a new mom and I am sure she doesn't want the same media coverage Brittany got with her baby. Who would....

Posted at 1:12PM on Jul 12th 2006 by angela

24. I HAD HEARD TOM CRUISE WAS STERILE TOO. LET'S ASK NICOLE.

Posted at 1:41PM on Jul 12th 2006 by KAREN

25. Has the family seen the Baby Suir? Just say "Yes".; So we don't think it's All A Big Hoax! "Where's the Baby, there she is"!

Posted at 2:01PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Nani

26. well tammy you are wrong...nichole kidman was not tom's first wife...he was married once before to mimmi rogers...personally i think that nichole couldn't go along with his game any longer and thats why they divorced...i mean she is talking about having kids with her new husband...but she and tom adopted? something is wrong there...but THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH ADOPTION...but when you have rumors flying around about your sexuality and you are adopting kids one day divorcing the next and then getting a child pregnant something is very wrong...and where is tom when you see katy on these outings...you never see them except in public events...now there is no baby the birth certificate could be a fraud...now rumors she might be prego again...geez...these people will do anything for publicity...they acted like idiots before the baby...now they have disappeared...time will tell time will tell!

Posted at 2:09PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Shawn

27. he is a sick man that needs jesus, that scientology BS isn't working

Posted at 2:18PM on Jul 12th 2006 by tmarie

28. I think the whole thing was a SETUP from the very first!!! Something has never been right about the whole thing!! To much showing off and all that! He went to pushing his Scientology garbage on the first date, that should say alot!! I bet it won't last 5 years if the do get married??
P.S. KittyTom, we are not stupid, we know a fake when we see one!!!!

Posted at 2:34PM on Jul 12th 2006 by Trea

29. maybe the sonogram that tool boy was so adamant on having in his house had adverse effects on the poor kid. Realistically, I think that tom is just being a stubborn prick and feels sidelined by the real Hollywood power couple, Brad and Ang. I wouldn't find it too far fetched to find it's his publicist that is stirring up all this baby suri speculation in an effort to gain public interest. Good try, but with all the other shit happening in Hollywood, no one really cares about a baby that was born nearly two months ago. And what the hell does someone that already has a gross amount of money need millions for a picture anyway. It’s beyond me.

Posted at 4:11PM on Jul 12th 2006 by james fearson

30. I've also heard that Tom can not have babies, that's why he and Nichole
adopted the two children .....

Posted at 5:51PM on Jul 12th 2006 by margie

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments