EXCLUSIVE: What Mags Will Pay For Suri Pics

TMZ has contacted the big players in the bidding wars over celebrity baby photos, and you may be surprised at what a picture of Suri Cruise can fetch.

Editorial staffers from People, Us Weekly, In Touch, Life and Style and OK! spoke candidly with TMZ, on condition that no names be used.

A source at OK! magazine tells TMZ that a set of exclusive, posed photos of the nearly three-month-old Suri would go for anywhere between 4 and $5 million -- People reportedly paid $4.1 million for pictures of Shiloh Jolie-Pitt. The OK! source believes the high price tag is justified, partly because there would be a huge spike in circulation but also because of "the cred" that a glossy would get by having the photos plastered all over the world.

But sources at In Touch and Life & Style magazines beg to differ. The feeling there -- that Suri's first pics would garner a relatively paltry $2 million - $3 million. One source said the concealment of Suri "stinks" of Tom trying to manipulate the situation by creating mystery and thereby driving the price up.

Over at People, a source tells TMZ that the photos would fetch less than Shiloh's. The source says the main draw is not the baby or Tom but Suri's mom -- "People are fascinated by Katie Holmes, who's leading such a weird life now," transforming from an apple-cheeked All-American girl into the Bride of Scientology.



An Us Weekly source also believes that Suri photos would be a less valuable commodity than Shiloh pics. The thinking -- Brad and Angelina were "beautiful and romantic" after their baby was born. The source says the value in Suri pics have more to do with the "freak factor" of her parents.

And there's this -- One editor told TMZ that the price of the photographs would depend in no small part on where the proceeds from the sale end up, implying that it would be a very different matter if the millions went to African orphans than straight into the coffers of the Church of Scientology.

But what if the first Suri pics were not posed but captured by a paparazzo? A source at Splash News, a photo agency, thinks the shot would be "the biggest picture by a long mile in the world, and that as time goes on, it will only get more valuable. " The source says one good shot could fetch up to $2 million.

Related links:
The Tomkat/Suri Conspiracy Timeline
EXCLUSIVE: Suri Cruise Birth Certificate
The Flurry Over Suri

Add to: My AOL, MyYahoo, Google, Bloglines
Sign up for:
AOL Alerts

Reader Comments

(Page 6 of 9) Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

76. you know what thats their own will if they dont want to show the baby to the world i think thats just fine because thats their baby and they have the right to do so , so everyone should keep their mouth shut and just bless the baby thats all and everyone have a good life .

Posted at 11:59PM on Jul 13th 2006 by ansla

77. for people out there are so mad that babys pictures are not posted what's got into you nothing really just do'nt go bitching about who's who not featured in the magazines and not making millions just leave them alone just accepted that all of you is also hungry to see the pictures and wants to compare the looks of the babies to another celebreties babies. Just admits it ...............

Posted at 12:01AM on Jul 14th 2006 by carly

78. I think all this is crazy the only reason I am reading is because I am up watching for more information and to keep up to date on the bombings in Israel now that is news worthy! Reading the bible is almost like watching the nightly news now. COME LORD JESUS! Oh by the way I would like to send my congrats to the new family a baby is a wonderful miracle wish the Cruise Family could be saved before it's too late.

Posted at 12:31AM on Jul 14th 2006 by michelle

79. I think the reason why we havent seen pictures of baby Suri is not b/c there tryin to sell their baby..its b/c the baby was probably scarafist (not sure if i spelt that right) b/c of his crazy religion

Posted at 12:49AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Baz

80. You know you guys are right who cares? We someone does. That's all we hear about.. I think Tom gets a lot of negatives when he sometimes doesn't deserve it. So what about his religion or if he's excited and jumping on couches. Do we pay him for that? He's and actor and so many of them are odd (Angelina Jolie). I do agree that this is and odd situation. I have always thought so, and I will be very irritated if the baby is a lie. I do not think it will be. Just let up on the guy!!

Posted at 12:50AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Stacy

81. Maybe Tom shouted SHOW ME THE BABEEEEEEEEEEEEE and got carried away "jumping the couch" that he accidently squashed her. So there you have it, she's flat as a pancake. Hey, having babies is "risky business". Maybe the" top gun " was shooting blanks and there's no baby. If you read the "minority report" it says there were " days of thunder " during the last days of pregnancy, and baby Suri got zapped. They shouldn't have had their " eyes wide shut", could have been prevented. Maybe Tom had too many "cocktails" and thought there was a baby. Tmz, investigate what's really going on . Will this be a "mission impossible " to solve? Who knows. I hope that the quest to find out what's going on w/ these nuts, don't cause a "war of the worlds". Here's yet another theory, could Suri be at the bottom of Dawson's Creek"?

Posted at 12:55AM on Jul 14th 2006 by HILDA

82. I just have one question. Why did Tom and Nicole adopt their 2 childred and not have one of their own? Is it because Tom cant have childred?? I have lost all respect for him as a person and an actor. I wont even watch anything he is in anymore. I think he is a NUT!!!!! And Katie I feel sorry for her. It seems she no longer has a life of her own.
And as far as those baby pictures go, I could care less....I think the magazines should just forget it and not offer any money or pursue it anymore. Let the "trash" tabolids have the pictures if there are any. And as far as the Pitt and Jolie baby goes ( she is adorable) I am sure that they are doing good things with the money they received. I must admit I didnt like her to much in the beginning I considered her the reason for Jen and Brad's brake up. When actually it was probally alot of other things. But the more I read about her the more I respect her. I think she is a wonderful person. ok enough about her.....
I think Tom and Katie are very pathetic.......and everyone should stop talking about them and let them ride off into the sunset where they belong......out of everyone's life. Thanks for listening (or should I say reading)

Posted at 1:01AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Deborah Adam

83. Why does any of this even matter??? So what if they did adopt a baby, does that make it any less theirs? So what if she is ugly?? Would you love your children any less if they were ugly? I keep hearing complaints on how they are manipulating people for attention. So stop paying attention to them. I know if I was in their place I wouldn't want pictures of my baby out there for the world to see. Do you realize just how many sick people there are in our world? I don't even feel safe with pictures of my daughters out where people can see them, just because it is not safe, so I can only imagine how they would feel with all the nut cases in hollywood.

Oh any btw.... I am not a Tom or Katie fan. Never have been, but as a parent I can see their point...

Posted at 1:03AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Becky

84. The only way Katie was impregnated by Tom was with a turkey baster and frozen L Ron Hubbarb sperm. If indeed there is a baby at all. It's all fishy ... and while I wish I could say I don't care ... I seem to be following this with train wreck facination. I want to see a picture ... and the results to a DNA test!

Posted at 1:05AM on Jul 14th 2006 by itspaula

85. The price of Suri (stupid, madeup, non-Hebrew name) pictures should be low, low, low in my opinion. I wouldn't buy a magazine with her photos in it because I could not possibly care less about the supposed offspring of this freak Tom Cruise and this poor young woman that he bamboozled into a relationship. Oh, how I wish Katie (yes, Katie -- not Kate)'s parents would kidnap her and slap a restraining order on TC. He is completely insane, I am convinced.

Posted at 1:06AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Ihatetomcruise

86. How did Tom have a kid anyway? The reason I remember he adopted way back when was because the Dr's told him he couldn't produce any kids

Posted at 1:06AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Justin

87. FLIPPIN' RIDICULOUS. Hell, there are millions of babies out there. No one cares about this one.

Posted at 1:09AM on Jul 14th 2006 by Sqwishie

88. What the fuck kind of names are Suri and Shilo anyway? And whats up with G.Paltrow naming hers Appple and Moses??? LOL. For once I'd like to see a high profile celeb have a kid with the name "brian" or "amy" lol

Posted at 1:19AM on Jul 14th 2006 by what

89.
In my opinion, the longer Katie and Tom wait to post baby pics, the less value they will fetch. New and fresh baby photos are best and not old ones as babies grow fast. It would be awesome to see mom and dad marry soon with a newborn. People are getting disinterested and bored with late baby news. Everyone wants to see a happy family with a newborn, so what's the hold up?

Posted at 2:47AM on Jul 14th 2006 by J. B. Pennington

90. I think Katie's family would never allow there daughter to act like a fraud they are really good people, katie was inseminated and Tom cant have kids.....maybe they just want to stay out of public because rumors are that people cant stand Tom anymore acting like a 16 year old.....I really cant believe Katie would do this with the way she was raised.......

Posted at 3:17AM on Jul 14th 2006 by marissa

Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments