Suri's Stroller Sighting

31. She looks like hell.

Posted at 2:04PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Equinox

32. WHO cares if they had a baby or not, leave them alone people! Jeez, it's sickening to keep hearing about them. And as for commenter #1 - Katie doesn't really have boobs!

Posted at 2:08PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Mary

33. Ok, her boobs are that low because she had a baby not too long ago and she's probably nursing, so they sag when they're not full. You must not know anyone who's had children

Posted at 2:14PM on Jul 17th 2006 by michelle

34. That doesn't look like Kate to me...

Posted at 2:16PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Debi

35. droppy breasts due to her milk production. please. honey i loved how my breasts looked when i was nursing and they were def not drooping to the ground.

Posted at 2:17PM on Jul 17th 2006 by johanna

36. well kate looks good after having a baby
[[a 7-10lbs. thing coming out of your vagina
after you carried it for 9 months]].
i dont think your moms looked too good after having you.
she might be unhappy, but its not your problem.
if people would leave them alone, maybe that
would put a smile on their faces.

Posted at 2:19PM on Jul 17th 2006 by lidia

37. Leave the poor girl alone!! She recently had a baby. Looks to me like she is doing a walking workout. It is her business what her breasts look like. She is most likely nursing her child, which is the best thing she can do for her baby (as well as keep her out of the spotlight.
Give it a rest people!

Posted at 2:20PM on Jul 17th 2006 by jlp

38. actually i dont think your mom
looked good as katie
before they had you.

Posted at 2:22PM on Jul 17th 2006 by lidia

39. I think the whole Tom's baby and Brooke's baby thing was a publicity stint for Tom since he's shown everyone what a jack ass he really is! I think baby Suri was born a couple weeks before now that all this stuff is odd about the birth certificate, and with the pics of Katie's big then not so big belly. Then again, maybe this kid isn't realy Tom's... because I do remember his first wife, Mimi Rogers, as well as Nicole and Tom talking about conception failures. Tom is wierd, he's no longer the fun loving Brian from Cocktail; he's makes Pauly Shore in Son-in-law look normal!

Posted at 2:25PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Jen

40. I just had my 2nd baby myself in June '06. I am not a celeb, [by all means], but I don't even take my newborn out in public that much. Most any new parent knows...you gotta have sleep in the first couple months! So what, maybe Katie felt like taking a walk without the baby. "Bouncing back" after giving birth takes a few weeks, at least!! Whenever they (Tom & Katie) feel like sharing their baby with the world, they will.

Posted at 2:25PM on Jul 17th 2006 by CJ

41. people - milking breasts do not look like that - even on A cup women

also - i read that scientologists are against breast feeding

Posted at 2:26PM on Jul 17th 2006 by no way

42. I sympathize with a young new mother trying to stay out of the limelight, to expose a child to the media so early in life can lead to a nonexistent private lifestyle and future emotional problems for the famous child. It also brings up issues of safety for such a young baby being exposed to an element that is so strange, confusing and threatening. Katie would look great in anything she wears even rags and Tom is too gorgeous to be living a gay lifestyle. If Tom is shooting blanks then am embryo can be impregnated with his sperm or a donor, it is a miracle of life to have a child and thank the lord that he is finally able to have his own child, rejoice and be happy for them.

Posted at 2:28PM on Jul 17th 2006 by PNR

43. I thought I remember them stating that the reason Tom and His Ex wife has to adopt was cuz he was shooting blanks?

Posted at 2:30PM on Jul 17th 2006 by cindy

44. Ok, so look. The price you pay for being famous is having a camera shoved in your face ALL of the time, get over it. Let me ask you this... Is the thought of sleeping with a man that is almost old enough to be your father not absolutely disgusting? I personally couldn't bring myself to carry a baby under those circumstances either. I don't think the baby is real. Take a look at the conveniences of the pregancy and all the announcements, Movie release + Engagement = $$$$ and publicity... Baby + upcoming video release= $$$$ and publicity. It doesn't take a rocket scientist but if we all buy into it, the publicists deserve a HEFTY bonus!

Posted at 2:31PM on Jul 17th 2006 by Leigh

45. dude - the scientologists who post their support of TomKat is really disgusting

this man is a nut job who uses your income to make his

the baby doesn't exisit or was born earlier than they reported - I hope the law catches up with Tom for commiting a fraud like this in public

Posted at 2:33PM on Jul 17th 2006 by L. Ron Hubbard