Lindsay Lohan showed the entire world yesterday what Brandon Davis has been dining out on (metaphorically speaking, of course) for months. As she exited a boat on the canals of Venice at the film festival there, she gave assembled photographers a presumably unintended show of that famous "flaming" part of her anatomy. (Being a family publication, we can't show you the real goods; for that privilege, you may want to click over to our friend Perez Hilton.)
Of course, this latest incident of Lohan-exposure begs the question: Were the paparazzi being pervy sleazebags by honing their lenses in on this particularly less-than-ladylike moment? Or should Lindsay have known better than to wear a long hike-up-prone dress without underwear?
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 6) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments
You can't make up stuff this crazy. You would think she would be keeping that things under wraps due to the firecroch thing.....
I've said it before - looks like she's been ridden hard and put up wet. And I didn't even need to see the firecrotch photo to come to that conclusion.
of all the websites that posted it, why would they link it to perez hiltons site? that is the most awful site. that pig deserves to fry in oil for us to eat bacon.
HELLO PEOPLE THAT PIX IS FAKER THEN FAKE!! I WENT TO PEREZ HILTON WEBSITE AND IF YOU TAKE A REALLY GOOD LOOK THE LEGS ARE DIFFERENT COLORS, TOTALLY FAKE PICTURE. IF YOU FALL FOR IT YOU MUST BE DUMB!
If the pic is not real it is just some attempt to gain more attention to this slut. She is losing some popularity so what better way to get your name out then show some skin or lips. Even if it is not the real thing it will get people talking.
SOOOOO FAKE !
my God! is TMZ owned by Paris ??
Freaking Stupid !
There is nothing FAKE about that picture. I think by now everyone has seen a p***y. Especially with all these celebrities leaving their house without their panties and showing up for public affairs. DAHHH. Paris herself did that at an award show when she lifted up her dress too high, and exposed her crotch. ( I am sure she did it on purpose to get more exposure, so to speak )
What's the deal with all these girls SHAVING themselves bald. WHATEVER !! mY ADVICE TO THESE GIRLS : Don't leave home without your underwear unless you want to see your private parts all over the front page of some tabloid magazine or website. GEEEZ Maybe a little common sense would help here.
Why would we think their fake, shes a slut isnt she? So I wouldnt doubt it.
I AM NOT SAYING THAT SHE IS NOT A SLUT, BUT I AM STATING THAT THE PICTURE IS QUESTIONABLE. IT LOOKS WEIRD! WHY ARE THE LEGS DIFFERENT? I AM NOT A PROFESSIONAL IT IS JUST MY ENTITLED OPINION JUST LIKE THE REST OF YOU CAN SAY IT IS TYPICAL OF HER AND I HAVE TO RESPECT THAT.
it looks droopy anad gross, but still the firecrotch jokes are just too much. C'mon now gives us a break.
http://www.perezhilton.com/realfirecrotch2.jpg
That's the actual pic right there.
(whistling...do your ears hang low)
If you're trying to stay out of trouble and stay away from bad press....why the hell would you leave the house without panties? That is a statement that screams for attention. C'mon Lohan...I keep trying to back you up thinking that there is more too you, considering you've worked hard for your money, but i cant keep up with all the crazy stunts! I think im gonna have to switch to the dark side....cant say I didnt try Linds!!
Lindsay should wear underwear at all times. I think the picture is real. Paris is photographed without underwear all the time.
Would love to put that fire out with my hose.
Ride a Lohan save a p***y.
P.S Limewire are you still involved in that charity work?
