Celebrity Justice
Jacko Settles Child Custody Dispute with Ex-Wife

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Michael Jackson and his ex-wife, Deborah Rowe, have settled their lengthy legal battle over custody and visitation rights for their two children, her lawyer said Friday.
Michael Jackson and Debbie Rowe
"We're still dealing with the details but it addresses all of the disputes between the parties," said attorney Marta Almli. "I can't say anything about the terms of the settlement but I don't think it would have happened if both parties didn't agree it was appealing to both of them."


She declined to give details on whether the settlement involves monetary payments to Rowe and visitation rights with the children, Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., known as Prince Michael, and Paris Michael Katherine Jackson.

"It is the settlement of all the issues," Almli said. Jackson's lawyer, Michael L. Abrams, did not immediately return phone calls from The Associated Press. He told The Daily Journal, a legal newspaper, "My client is very satisfied with the results. Hopefully (Jackson and Rowe) can both get on with their lives now and be through with this litigation."

The lawsuit was a byproduct of the 2003 charges filed against Jackson alleging child molestation. Rowe, who had relinquished all of her parental rights to the children, changed her mind after Jackson's arrest, according to court documents. "Everything changed," Rowe said in a declaration, and she regretted having given up her rights to see the children. Rowe and the pop star were married in 1996 and she filed for divorce in 1999. The divorce became final in 2000. She filed to terminate her parental rights in 2001 and the court accepted her declaration in which she said, "Michael has been a wonderful father to the children, and I do not wish to share any parenting responsibilities with Michael because he is doing so well without me."

According to court documents, she said, "I want to forever give up any and all rights pertaining to the children because I believe that by doing so, it is in the children's best interest." Before that, she said in documents, Jackson had allowed her visitation rights only if she went to distant locations such as Geneva and South Africa.

After Jackson's arrest in 2003 she filed for temporary custody alleging that she became concerned that during the criminal case, Jackson would be too distracted to care for the children. She also said she was disturbed by his association with the Nation of Islam, whose leader she believed was anti-Semitic. "I am Jewish, as are -- by definition -- my children. I worried about how my children would be treated by these new advisers to Michael," she said.

Rowe testified for Jackson at his molestation trial, describing him as a loving and caring father.

She said in documents that she last saw the children in 2005 and had not seen them since Jackson left the United States shortly after his trial ended in acquittal on all charges. He has been living abroad since then but his lawyers continued to negotiate with Rowe.

On Sept. 6 a judge ruled that Jackson must pay Rowe $60,000 in attorney fees from the custody battle. Jackson also has a third child, Prince Michael II. The boy's mother has not been identified.

Tags: Debbie Rowe, DebbieRowe, Michael Jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 5) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

46. I knew it...hee hee. Welthen. If you read my post I said, (and I quote) "I do not claim to be perfect...in ANY sense. Not in life and not in grammar and spelling" so no, I don't really want you to point out all of my errors. You are missing the point dahhhhling. But that's OK...I fully expected that. My point was that people should at least CARE and try. If you can't always quite make it...that's OK too. To me, however it is at least important to recognize that it's important to try and do your best. That's all. ta ta.

Thank you Lou...you've got my back. HAHA.

Posted at 3:07PM on Sep 30th 2006 by Missy

47. Gee Lou, At least Missy and wellthen can refrain from using potty mouth words. Have at least a little class.

Posted at 3:08PM on Sep 30th 2006 by sosad

48. Michael's son's name isn't Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., it's Prince Michael Jackson Jr. And leave the man alone, for God's sake.

Posted at 6:27PM on Sep 30th 2006 by Christian

49. #46 sosad -- does your name describe your face, your body, your social/love life, or all of the above?

Posted at 3:35PM on Sep 30th 2006 by Lou

50. It describes what I thought after reading your post.

Posted at 3:42PM on Sep 30th 2006 by sososad

51. Don't think so sad. I think I hit the nail on the head.

Posted at 6:20PM on Sep 30th 2006 by Lou

52. Both these people are ghouls.....in their hearts and in their faces....bless those poor children having these two things for parents. Their faces would make some good Halloween masks though.

Posted at 7:30PM on Sep 30th 2006 by Trinity

53. #51 Trinity -- funny word to describe these two -- "ghouls." I know what it means but wanted Webster's definition ...."a person with macabre tastes or interests." BINGO!!!!

Posted at 9:12PM on Sep 30th 2006 by jennifer

54. I thought she worked in a plastic surgeons office? Man, she needs some work done on herself. And as for the kids, they don't have a chance in hell of being normal. Poor kids.

Posted at 10:59AM on Oct 1st 2006 by ASD

55. I don't know who's uglier Jackson or his butt ugly egg donor.

Posted at 5:01PM on Oct 1st 2006 by Caroline E.

56. she look like a crack whore (the one the right)

Posted at 6:00PM on Oct 2nd 2006 by roy

57. Ya'll are some haters. This is about a nasty looking chunky chick who gave up her kids trying to make more money. if it's all like that she wouldn't have had to have michael jackson pay for her legal costs.

She made her money and probably already spent it. guess what...to bad.

your NASTY...and michael is the BOMB!

Posted at 11:11AM on Oct 4th 2006 by Yolanda

58. unless you walk in someone else's shoes who are we to judge what he is or he isn't and that goes for her as well but she didn't want the kids or have anything to do with them.so if he takes care of them who cares

Posted at 9:47AM on Oct 11th 2006 by CAROL

59. Debbie is a nice person, and is very kind and caring to
her animals, which I have seen first hand. Maybe there are other sides to her story, judging a person from
press reports, is cruel. Everyone makes mistakes, at least she is trying to do the right thing.

Posted at 1:55PM on Nov 27th 2006 by gen

60. Dave in comment #2. How do you know how bad their family may be. Do you have first hand knowledge, have you been to any family gatherings. I thought so you can not judge a book by its cover cause if so I could say you sound f***ked up also. LOL Im sick and tired of people and their comments and judgement

Posted at 3:46PM on Nov 27th 2006 by Michael

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |