Kirstie Alley Big Again

46. Have you seen the guy Harvey that runs this site? He's fat as hell. You got a lot of nerve Harvey.

Posted at 3:40PM on Dec 11th 2006 by tootsnort

47. All of you who are saying she's lying about weighing 145, you need to do a little research. A pound of fat and a pound of muscle obviously are still a pound. BUT the pound of fat, takes up a LOT More spcae, a pound of fat blobs everywhere, but a pound of muscle is tight and compact and doesnt take much space. So she COULD be 145 with a lot of fat in that 145 pounds. After all she's pretty old, so older people don't have as much muscle. She probably is 145, but it's mostly fat and not muscle.

Posted at 5:02PM on Dec 11th 2006 by teeks

48. She still has a pretty face. Hey if shes happy leave her alone. I agree she wasnt ready for Oprah though.

Posted at 5:42PM on Dec 11th 2006 by susie

49. Teeks...here you go again.

She is at least 200 lbs. period.

Posted at 6:03PM on Dec 11th 2006 by Lisa

50. She's getting up in age. Her body wants to get to get back to the weight that it wanted to be.

Posted at 6:34PM on Dec 11th 2006 by tom

51. Maybe she had a extra helping of her weight watchers meal

Posted at 8:30PM on Dec 11th 2006 by John

52. haha! I can't believe there is an ad directly below the "comments" button for this blog entry that says "presented by mcdonald's"

yeah it is!

Posted at 7:19PM on Dec 11th 2006 by outoftown

53. Never did like her, to big a mouth and everything else!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 10:17PM on Dec 11th 2006 by I agree

54. The day that what Kirstie eats ends up putting weight on MY body, is the day that I'll concern myself with her weight. Otherwise, what-ev-er!

Posted at 11:25PM on Dec 11th 2006 by Yolanda

55. To No. 2 that was so fake with that blanket around her back side, what a joke, who cares about her weight she is so ugly

Posted at 9:48AM on Dec 12th 2006 by audrey rose

56. I with the people who said that it's an old picture! She did not gain that much weight since she was on Oprah!

Posted at 10:24AM on Dec 12th 2006 by girly

57. Just a bad pic ! I'm proud of her for her hard work! The slower you lose the better anyway. Don't let any of these losers get to ya Kirstie... Keep at it, and either way, I think you're beautiful :)
Bonnie from Illinois

Posted at 5:13PM on Dec 12th 2006 by Bonnie

58. I could care less how much she weighs, she has lost alot of wt and no one realy looks small in big pants. Give her a break she is a great lady, she is nice, beautiful and sweet and she has never tried to be a Bitch like some of the other actresses.
She is just having a bad day.

Posted at 4:26PM on Dec 15th 2006 by Lisa White mystickmedic@yahoo.com

59. "All of you who are saying she's lying about weighing 145, you need to do a little research. A pound of fat and a pound of muscle obviously are still a pound. BUT the pound of fat, takes up a LOT More spcae, a pound of fat blobs everywhere, but a pound of muscle is tight and compact and doesnt take much space. So she COULD be 145 with a lot of fat in that 145 pounds. After all she's pretty old, so older people don't have as much muscle. She probably is 145, but it's mostly fat and not muscle."

- I am the same height as Kirstie and there is NO WAY she weighed 145 lbs on the Oprah show. I looked much smaller than she did when I weighed 165 lbs (I'm currently at 125 lbs). She must have weighed about 175-180 when she was on the show. I know losing weight is hard, but I've done it and kept it off for almost a year. I am proud of her accomplishments, but she needs to be honest about her weight.

Posted at 12:00PM on Dec 18th 2006 by Sami