Paula Abdul is a Brat

Paula Abdul / BratzEveryone's favorite tween hussies are hitting the big screen.

That's right, come August 2007, "Bratz: The Movie," a live-action version of the creepy dolls, will indoctrinate a slew of unsuspecting young girls into the belief that empowerment comes from being ultra-skinny, wearing tight slutty clothes and piling on enough makeup and eyelashes to become card-carrying members of the Tammy Faye Fan Club.

Flighty American Idol judge Paula Abdul has been brought onboard as executive producer and will appear in the film in a major role. Paula will also put her fizzy dizziness to work in multiple creative areas, including music, choreography and fashion. It is unknown at this time whether or not Paula will have her eyes surgically altered to match the dolls.

Hide the children, the Bratz (and Paula) are coming.



Tags: bratx the movie, BratxTheMovie, bratz, executive producer, ExecutiveProducer, lionsgate, live action, LiveAction, paula abdul, PaulaAbdul, the movie, TheMovie

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 2) Previous 15 Comments

16. Please don't say nasty things about Paula. She is a very nice person. I really dont
know her but from what I have seen she is a lovely person.
People just be nice.

Posted at 6:55PM on Jan 13th 2007 by Greg

17. I agree with Da mama and J Dub.

And the defenders of Paula and any celeb when they act in an outrageous manner are the kind of people who have no life, are morally bankrupt and that need something to believe in. They would defend them if they did anything.

Kathy Ireland , now that's a role model for little girls. Isn't it amazing that you never hear a thing about her ever in the media or press. That's because she long ago decided she wanted to concentrate on family values and she didn't believe in facade of celebrity and the false adulation that comes with it.

The Britannys, Paris's, Rosies, Anna Nicole's, Lindsey's, Madonnas, all the bling bling idiots, everyone whoever posed for Swank, Stank, Playboy, Hustler, and every other so called celeb out there showing their ass in public for the world to see in the name of the almighty dollar are nothing more than moneys in a cage as the silent conservative population drive thru the zoo trying to cover our kid's eyes saying " Don't Look , sweetheart" cover your eyes. This is everything worng with this country. This is everything you DON'T WANT TO BE.

I admit, sometimes I do watch to see what they are up to. But then again I am a huge rubber necker when I drive and see an accident. Chances are you have beeped at me before.

Posted at 6:27AM on Jan 14th 2007 by R

18. Sorry that was monkies in a cage not moneys in a cage. See they corrupted me too.

I just read where Brittany gave 300 dollars to a homeless man who came to her car window at an intersection. Big freaking deal!!!!!!!!!

It's a fact that the celebrity circle is the least philanthropic population in the world per capita. I do not dislike all celebrities. Many are very charitable. But idiots like I mentioned in my previous post who have no clue about right or wrong let alone basic decency give next to nothing. And when they do it's to make themselves feel better or look better in the press.

Britanny , you want to make a difference. Give half of your earnings to make a difference. Create a homeless shelter. Change lives that way. Giving 300 dollars from your car window I'm sure made you feel great when you drove off. And I'm sure it kept him drunk for a good week.

I know people who make 24-40k a year who do what you did. That's because they don't have the ability to make much of a difference. You do.

Tell you what, I challenge you: Get your bimbo party animal friends together, Paris included , pool your resources and money together and pony up a good 500 million and come up with something that impacts people's lives and change them forever. And do it anonymously. Don't have your idiot publicist (who should be fired long ago) send out a press release after you do it.

Take the money you've made from having a halfway decent voice, dancing around naked and polluting the young girls of the world and put it to good use.

And clean yourself up, hold onto a few hundred million, and remove yourself from the circus, move to Iowa , fall in love, change your name and become a kindergarten teacher and choreograph your kid's school plays. Much more fulfilling. You'll love it.

I hear Kathy Ireland is pretty happy these days.

Posted at 6:47AM on Jan 14th 2007 by R

19. And one other thing: Honestly, I would love to wake up one day turn on Current Affair, or ET and see a school teacher arguing with or suing the paparazzi for chasing her/him around all day after learning her/he created a program in school that changed a kids life for the better? I can see this teacher backing out of her school parking lot with the cameras snapping and people screaming at her as she dives into her Ford Focus and gets in a minor fender bender as she tries to escape the swarming papparazi. And I bet it wouldn't take any thought whatsoever for her/he to get out and leave a note on the windshield. Now that's the America I want to live in.

Oh yeah, I almost forgot, please add Paula to my list. She's actually a very nice person I'm sure. She just doesn't have the courage to stand up to the zookeepers and zoowatchers and say, Yes, I have a problem and I am addicted to something. She has good reason to have problems with whatever she's on. I'm sure living the facade without true love in her life (which she desperately wants) is unbearable at times. She needs to step off the rollercoaster , go into rehab, and come back better and clear headed and start a celebrity philanthropy reality show.
Whatever that is....

Come on, wouldn't you like to see schoolteachers, scientists, librarians, firefighters, nurses, doctors, cops, chased around all day by CNN, ET, Current Affair, and blog about them and have the camera turned on them.

I would love it because I can just picture the idiots I mentioned earlier sitting around with their publicists (screaming at them) trying to figure out how to get the paparazzi chasing them again. Let's call a timeout in life. Let's pay schoolteachers, scientists, librarians, firefighters, nurses, doctors, cops what Paris and Britanny get and pay Paris and Britanny and those who happen to sing or dance or act better than we can what the people who actually make a difference what they make.

A guy can dream can't he? I have a dream!!!

Posted at 7:06AM on Jan 14th 2007 by R

20. Bratz R no worse than Barbie so I don't know what the heck you R talkin about I am sure you let your children play with Barbies didn't you ! bratz r not a bad influence to kids. In their movies, they tell you to just be your self and be confident in yourself!

Posted at 10:26AM on Feb 24th 2007 by jkdfjgldfh

21. Oh and btw, at least Bratz don't have bust sizes twice the size of their natural head! lol

Posted at 8:59AM on Feb 26th 2007 by the real deal

22. Bratz are definetly not the best role models for girls, but Barbie isn't that much better. As someone said, just look at the measurements for her chest, I mean, is she Pamela Anderson? (sure looks like it).

Although Bratz are not appopriately dressed & wear too much make-up, I think they're just more fun to play with for kids. They have different hairstyles, eye colour, detailed clothing, most come with 2 sets of clothes, cool earrings (I really don't see what's so bad about girls having earrings)... In other words, Barbie had it coming, Mattel should have listened to the demands fo the customers more, but now they've missed out.

In conclusion, both Bratz and Barbie just reflect our superficial society, where it's promoting the girls to be shopoholics that wear too much make-up and not enough clothes or that the ideal beauty is a blue-eyed big-chested blond.

Posted at 11:08PM on Apr 8th 2007 by Elvira

Previous 15 Comments