Train Wrecks
"Captivity" Audience Rebels as 'Torture Porn' Arouses MPAA Fury

CaptivityIn Hollywood, unprecedented chutzpah is usually met with approbation, not probation.


But not today.


The Motion Picture Association today took the unusual step of issuing a month-long suspension of the ratings process for Roland Joffe's upcoming horror film, "Captivity." The film was planned for a May 18 release, but will not have to wait a full month before it can go before the MPAA ratings board, meaning that it will likely miss its planned release date if it wants to get a rating.


This all started a week ago, when "Captivity" billboards starting putting people off their lunch in L.A. and New York: Four graphic panels showed a young woman going through "abduction," "confinement," "torture" and "termination." As the Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez aptly put it, "I thought about ordering up a photo of the billboard for this column, but trust me, you don't want to see it. I felt like I needed to take a shower just from having been within a hundred feet of it."


Jill Soloway, who knows a thing or two about the portrayal of death from her stint as the executive producer of HBO's "Six Feet Under," blogged on the Huffington Post, that "it somehow managed to recall Abu Ghraib, the Holocaust, porn and snuff films all at once."


The MPAA says the 'art' work was "summarily rejected" but went up on billboards anyway. After Dark insisted it was a "communications error" with their printer, and said they'd be taken down. Six days later, they were still up. Finally, they came down, but were replaced with a defiant "'Captivity' was here." Hardly contrition, though Courtney Soloman, the film's producer, said "nothing like this can ever happen again."


Now, per the MPAA, "the production company and its distributors will also be required to clear not only all promotional materials but also the locations and venues of all advertising buys relating to the film" -- the first time such a demand has ever been issued by the MPAA.


Clearly, we're in for some interesting times ahead: In a recent interview with MTV.com, 'splat pack' director Eli Roth ("Hostel") had this to say: "Hopefully, we'll get to a point where there are absolutely no restrictions on any kind of violence in movies."


And as for After Dark, well, even more good news: They've just acquired the North American distribution rights to the suicide-themed comedy, "Wristcutters," about young adults who kill themselves and end up in purgatory. They're currently planning a campaign wherein teens are shown committing suicide by jumping off bridges, electrocuting or hanging themselves.



Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. Oh my GOD...people are SICKER than I thought!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 8:26AM on Mar 30th 2007 by plaquefree

2. Eventually, even these films' intended audiences -- ignorant frat boy working-class lunkheads -- will tire of this spiel and move on. The sooner the better, too.

Posted at 11:46AM on Mar 30th 2007 by Vincent

3. Yessss.... These kinds of movies will never go away. My favorites are the old ones from the 70s when they used cow parts for the gore. I forget what the title was, but one of my favs is the one where the girl is on the cover with her intestines falling out... Bring out your dead.

And to the person who wrote the 'frat boy' comment. The only difference between you and a frat boy is that a frat boy went to a university, and you went to a community college, if at all.

corporate_exploitation@hotmail.com

Posted at 7:08AM on Mar 31st 2007 by Howard Simian Rowel

4. Having been "abducted, held captive and tortured" myself (luckily I was spared the "termination" part).........I see no entertainment in this type of movie. Maybe for some people it is exciting. Probably for the same type of person who committed the atrocious acts that were done to me.

Posted at 1:18PM on Apr 1st 2007 by Dana

5. It's a movie folks.

Posted at 4:05PM on Mar 31st 2007 by Steve Chandler Arizona

6. RE: "It's a movie folks".
That's true. But so is child porn and snuff films. Why not openly show them to the public also then?

Posted at 5:18PM on Mar 31st 2007 by Dana

7. Once again its a movie! These things did not really happen. So Child porn and nothing to do with it. If you don't want to watch these types of movies DONT!

Posted at 6:21PM on Apr 1st 2007 by DAWN

8. Dana, I am truly sorry for what happened to you, but to blame movies for what your abductor did to you is just excusing his actions and behaviors. If that happened to me I would be angry as hell and not blame movies or Hollywood - I would blame his parents, society and legal system. This individual probably did horrible things to animals or other humans long before he abducted you. Why let him off so easy?

The same argument is often made about blamining pornography for rape. Porn does not lead someone to rape - if it did there would be millions of men out there raping women every day. Porn is consumed (in all its various forms) by millions of people (male and female) all over the world and the vast majority of people have never and will never commit a violent act. Rape is an act of control and violence - it's not about sex.

Now, of course, child pornography is completely different. It is not "just a movie" and to say that is ignorant and irresponsible. Child porn is against the law, adult porn and horror films are not. I think we can all understand the difference and don't need me to explain it to you.

Snuff films are more of an urban legend than anything. The films show horrible violence and supposed death of the victim, but law enforcement agencies have never been able to prove the films were anything but realistic looking fakes.

Marketing materials are meant to arouse interest in a particular film. I would say the billboards for "Captivity" have certainly done that. Hollywood makes many movies that are not in the horror genre, so if horror is not your cup of tea then skip it.

Posted at 10:43PM on Apr 1st 2007 by Debbie

9. The billboard they pulled from the ad campain can be seen here. ( only photo I could find on the net)
http://www.askmepc.com/page17.html

Posted at 10:34AM on Apr 3rd 2007 by ll

10. its just a movie

Posted at 2:42PM on Apr 6th 2007 by Mary

11. I Hope this happens to my X G/F !

Posted at 10:45AM on Apr 5th 2007 by BILLBOARD IS HOT ! \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

12. To say that movies don't influence people is ridiculous. Advertisers spend billions of dollars trying to influence people's actions and then to say that a movie doesn't is crazy. Ted Bundy the serial killer said that porn influenced his actions. Not everyone will become a rapist or killer but ideas are planted and I'm sure there are a few that will want to try these things. There's the guy that want's it to happen to his ex.

Posted at 8:14PM on Apr 5th 2007 by Diane

13. It may just be a movie, but everything we consume has an influence on our minds. The more exposure to violence, the more indifference to violence, which if you think about it isn't a good thing at all. That doesn't mean the movie shouldn't be allowed to exist or be shown anywhere in public, but a veritable censorship through restricted ratings is reasonable, particularly if it blocks young people from seeing it.

Posted at 2:14AM on Apr 9th 2007 by Alison

14. It is not just a movie. It desensitizes people to real violence. If it was really just a movie there would be no reason to have ratings.

Posted at 4:26PM on Apr 6th 2007 by Diane

15. See #12. People really are sicker than we thought.

Posted at 4:29PM on Apr 6th 2007 by Diane

| 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments