Train Wrecks
"Captivity" Audience Rebels as 'Torture Porn' Arouses MPAA Fury

CaptivityIn Hollywood, unprecedented chutzpah is usually met with approbation, not probation.


But not today.


The Motion Picture Association today took the unusual step of issuing a month-long suspension of the ratings process for Roland Joffe's upcoming horror film, "Captivity." The film was planned for a May 18 release, but will not have to wait a full month before it can go before the MPAA ratings board, meaning that it will likely miss its planned release date if it wants to get a rating.


This all started a week ago, when "Captivity" billboards starting putting people off their lunch in L.A. and New York: Four graphic panels showed a young woman going through "abduction," "confinement," "torture" and "termination." As the Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez aptly put it, "I thought about ordering up a photo of the billboard for this column, but trust me, you don't want to see it. I felt like I needed to take a shower just from having been within a hundred feet of it."


Jill Soloway, who knows a thing or two about the portrayal of death from her stint as the executive producer of HBO's "Six Feet Under," blogged on the Huffington Post, that "it somehow managed to recall Abu Ghraib, the Holocaust, porn and snuff films all at once."


The MPAA says the 'art' work was "summarily rejected" but went up on billboards anyway. After Dark insisted it was a "communications error" with their printer, and said they'd be taken down. Six days later, they were still up. Finally, they came down, but were replaced with a defiant "'Captivity' was here." Hardly contrition, though Courtney Soloman, the film's producer, said "nothing like this can ever happen again."


Now, per the MPAA, "the production company and its distributors will also be required to clear not only all promotional materials but also the locations and venues of all advertising buys relating to the film" -- the first time such a demand has ever been issued by the MPAA.


Clearly, we're in for some interesting times ahead: In a recent interview with MTV.com, 'splat pack' director Eli Roth ("Hostel") had this to say: "Hopefully, we'll get to a point where there are absolutely no restrictions on any kind of violence in movies."


And as for After Dark, well, even more good news: They've just acquired the North American distribution rights to the suicide-themed comedy, "Wristcutters," about young adults who kill themselves and end up in purgatory. They're currently planning a campaign wherein teens are shown committing suicide by jumping off bridges, electrocuting or hanging themselves.



Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 2) Previous 15 Comments

16. Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, these types of extreeme graphically violent films that portray torture/rape/murder actually do excite the minds of people who are sick with mental problems that tend toward violence. There is a percentage of people in our world's population that are predisposed to violence whether it be from genetically caused problem with brain development, or from an abused childhood/past. These "films" give encourgement to those individuals who are struggling to control very violent tendencies. I hope that no one should ever become a victim of a demented persons acting out a fantasy that this film got him all worked up over.

Posted at 10:25PM on Apr 30th 2007 by Kate

17. These folks are out to make money and they don't care who gets hurt. Deny it all they want, but people are influenced by what they see and hear. There are some sickos out there who can barely control their violent tendencies. We don't need to give them extreeme graphic violent films to encourge them to potentially target our loved ones.

Posted at 10:26PM on Apr 30th 2007 by Kate

18. To Kate,

Can you please provide evidence which proves that 'demented persons' have acting out their fantasies after being supposedly influenced by a violent film?

The horror genre goes back to the 1790s with the so-called gothic novels. These novels were the biggest sellers back in the day and many people blamed it on the rise of Napoleon and his terrifying invasion throughout Europe. Rather than being terrified by a rational menace, the public choose to be terrified by an irrational menace instead. The next wave of violent literature was the 1890s ghost/gothic stories. These stories skyrocketed after the crimes of Jack the Ripper in 1888, with the public deciding once again to be terrified by an irrational terror and not the rational terror killing women. The next wave was 1960s and 1970s. This time we had cinema to shock and scare. This epoch had a rise in serial killers and the height of the Cold War. Today, with terrorism increasing and the planet awash with wars, it appears that we are about to enter a new era of violent cinema, perhaps due to people wanting to be scared of irrational peril rather than rational peril.

I personally see nothing wrong with this. It is a well known fact that Japan produces the most violent entertainment in the entire world and has a relatively low crime rate. Holland is the least censored country in Europe in regards to what they can watch on television and video, yet they too have a relatively low crime rate. Spain, S. Korea, and Denmark can also be included on this list.

Diane said, "To say that movies don't influence people is ridiculous. Advertisers spend billions of dollars trying to influence people's actions and then to say that a movie doesn't is crazy."

Diane, I have a cat and not a dog. If I see an advertisement for dog food, I do not feel the need to go out and buy dog food. Also, regarding your comment about Ted Bundy. Before Ted Bundy even said porn influenced his actions in that famous interview one day before his execution, he said that he himself was responsible for his own actions and not pornography. It was only later on in the interview that he said 'pornograpgy dragged him into a world of sexual violence.' Which side of Ted Bundy do you wish to believe? I believe neither, for he was a pathological liar.

Posted at 9:56AM on May 2nd 2007 by Darrell

Previous 15 Comments