After Steve Jobs' Jedi Mindtrick, EMI Kills DRM

Steve JobsAnother irony land-speed record, shattered.

Just two months after Steve Jobs produced his essay, "Thoughts on Music" on his weblog, EMI, one of the world's big four record companies, has elected to take his advice and dump DRM, or Digital Rights Management anti-piracy software, on all the music it sells online (Beatles not included). It's enough to make you want to scream, "You weak-minded fool! He's using an old Jedi mind-trick!"

In February's "Thoughts on Music," Jobs argued that the reason why record labels ought to dump DRM:

"The simplest answer is because DRMs haven't worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy. Though the big four music companies require that all their music sold online be protected with DRMs, these same music companies continue to sell billions of CDs a year which contain completely unprotected music. That's right! No DRM system was ever developed for the CD, so all the music distributed on CDs can be easily uploaded to the Internet, then (illegally) downloaded and played on any computer or player."

In other words, why bother padlocking the back door if the front door is left wide open?

But instead of asking, "Why not lock the front door and the back door?" Jobs -- whose biases are self-evident with over 90 million iPods sold -- employs the old Jedi mind-trick and says both doors should be left unlocked.

So, why are the labels so willing to have Jobs lead them around by the nose?

In part, it's their own incompetence: The record labels' efforts to lock their "front door" of CD sales have been utterly ham-handed. As CNET's Molly Wood brilliantly explained Sony's efforts at safe-guarding its CDs:

"...You buy a [Sony] CD. You put the CD into your PC in order to enjoy your music. Sony grabs this opportunity to sneak into your house like a virus and set up camp, and it leaves the backdoor open so that Sony or any other enterprising intruder can follow and have the run of the place. If you try to kick Sony out, it trashes the place."

Oops; lawsuits.

The other reason? The labels have little choice but to do as Jobs asks: His iTunes has already nailed down 70% of the online music market, even though 97% of all music on iPods doesn't come via download. The labels have mismanaged their past so badly, they have no choice but to let Jobs run their present, and therefore their future.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 1)

1. The more things change, the more they stay the same. I'm old enough to remember when home taping (on cassette!) was going to kill the music industry. Then it was recordable CDs that were going to kill it, for sure this time. Then Napster, then iTunes and who knows what will be next. But, even before the cassette days, the industry has not dared to address the real reason they are in trouble (or least not hauling in the piles of $$ they used to - so they say). And that reason is as follows : THE CDs COST TOO MUCH, YOU GENIUSES! I mean really, why is it that the CD business is dying while the DVD business is going gang busters? Because I can go down to my local Wal-Mart and buy a DVD for $5 to $10 while an audio only CD costs me $15 to $20. Drop the prices and, like magic, the music industry will be thriving again. As for downloads, they should be "free". You heard me - "FREE". Free like cable TV is free. I pay a monthly fee and I should be able to download (AND BURN!) to my heart's content. On top of my monthly fee the website owner (the record company) will make millions (if not billions) selling adspace on the website and selling my addresses for spam and junk mail. As for DRM, the money that the industry wastes on that has only served to alienate and tick off their customers. I say keep it up if you want to put the final nail in your coffin. I buy alot of music off the web now directly from artist's web sites. As far as I'm concerned, that is the future of the music biz.

Posted at 5:04PM on Apr 3rd 2007 by ccruz

2. The rights mangment is very irritating. I used to buy cds quit often. I had to sell them for pennies on the dollar in a time of need. The idea of having alot of music on a computer to listen to sounds appealing, but in actuality it's a pain sometimes. Media player for example always wants to make sure everything you have is legit. When trying out realplayer one day and then wanting to switch back to media player , I found that I lost my whole library. I think music sells itself, and if you like the experience, you want more, and you will pay for it if you make a decent income. You'll pay for it sometimes even if your income is low. While playing music for a friend , I am actually a sales rep for these people. But I just don't listen much anymore. Silence is way underrated. I wish I could get a copyright on silence and make airplanes, and auto traffic, and Loud booming rapsters pay me for infringement!!

Posted at 10:25PM on Apr 3rd 2007 by meherenow

3. Once again this change only hurts indie artists, etc.

Posted at 6:37PM on Apr 6th 2007 by Cynthia Basinet