Pax's New Name -- It's the Pitts!

Click here for pax's documentsAngelina Jolie has filed a petition in L.A. County Superior Court to change the name of her latest adopted child from Pax Thien Jolie to Pax Thien Jolie-Pitt.

In papers filed April 16 and obtained today by TMZ, Angelina -- the sole adoptive parent of Pax -- is requesting the change so it will reflect the last name of her partner, Brad Pitt, and so it is the same as that of her other three children.

Angelina adopted the three-and-a-half-year-old little boy from an orphanage in Vietnam last March.




Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 11) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. I can't imagine Brad Pitt not adding his name to this child. It is not the child's fault that he is the most recent band-aid for a women will real mental health issues. I would lose all respect if Pitt didn't adopt him. Hell, Pitt may end up being the only normal part of their lives. Going from Prague to Cannes to LA to NYC is not conducive to these children having any stability in their lives. Pax and Maddox should be in school. Zahara could be in a 2yr old program. Be all this as it may, given their resources, I am still hard pressed to understand why an American child (with special needs even) isn't on this couple's radar. Finally, Jolie needs therapy and for her to admit to cutting her boyfriends after sex and being sexual in kindegarten is a cry for help.

Posted at 7:22PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Mythbreak

17. I'm sure the Jolie-Pitt's will be delighted that their street and city are online here. Are you nuts? You could have blurred that part out.

Posted at 8:47PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Hmmmm

18. LOL, guess who missed being in the news!!! daddy brad needs more hands. mommy has to work because daddy brad can't.

Posted at 7:27PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mediawhorejolie

19. Booooorrrring. Who Cares?

Posted at 7:30PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Haley

20. hey number 18, they would if it was someone else. all hail the queen.

Posted at 7:30PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mediawhorejolie

21.

Just because they adopted these children doesnt make Jolie and Pitt ,

the best parents around . Couples might make everyone think there

relationship is good and all , but when it comes down to it , Is Jolie and Pitt

really spending time with these kids ??????

Come people , between them making movies , spending hoursssssss

outside the home , someone like the nannies are raising these kids.

Who are they really kidding ???? Not me .

A real parent is with there kids daily , I dont see Jolie or Pitt being with

them all the time . Celebs wants everyone to think , Oh i have a child

and now im spending time with them , when actually they aren't .

Nannies are the ones who raises the Celebs children not the parents.

Posted at 7:33PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Nannies are raising these children , NOT Jolie and Pitt

22. Mythbreak-
Your name is really mythmaker. Face facts, Brad and Angelina are for real, they are together, they are happy, and more kids will join this family, either by birth or adoption. Brad and Angelina have both said for years that they want bunches of kids and that's what they have. I see 6-7 kids before they stop growing their family.

All that crap about Angelina's past is just that, and some of what you quoted is what tabs recently printed, and we all know that they lie, they've admitted it. Your prejudice is on display. People do grow up, they do mature, they do become responsible adults. Jealously does not become you well.

They have tutors for the kids when they travel, and take them to daycare for socialization in LA and NOLA. They have the means and the desire to provide well for all their children. When one is working the other is with the kids, if that isn't stability then what is. Their children will know more about the world than many adults. They insist on the family being together. Nannies are not raising their kids out of their sight, they are hands on parents, and they are damm good parents.

Posted at 7:39PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mazy2

23. All you negative posters need to back the "f" up!!! These are good people doing something good for the world. It does not matter if they are married or not because they are doing more for their children than most married people even consider. You people obviously have miserable little lives so you are jealous that others have some money and some ambition to make a difference. What difference did you make in the world today? None I am sure. You are only showing your ignorance when you rant and rave about people you do not know and assume facts that are untrue. They call that SLANDER in the real world...your subpeona is on the way!!!!!

Posted at 7:41PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Mary

24. well, this is a story for the jolienuts. hope your queen is as great as you think. anyone disagreeing will be called, fat, jealous, aniston lovers (then rip aniston to shreds) Just answer, how can they be a family when they are not together. Most married couples, one stays home while one works doesn't even apply here. If you love this woman, get her some help, these are children, i'm sure she loves them but she is keeping them from living normal lives. They won't be together for awhile. Besides, I think Jolie has someone already, if not, soon. sorry brad.

Posted at 7:40PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mediawhorejolie

25. another movie star idiot family--

Posted at 7:41PM on Apr 24th 2007 by jesse

26. I dont care how many she adopts, it would be nice if she / they helped the children HERE.
And her comments she has made about her own biological daughter was disgraceful .
Brad should get the heck out NOW !!!
What a fool to leave Jennifer for that KOOK . I lost respect for him.

Posted at 7:44PM on Apr 24th 2007 by beachlife

27. lol..right on Mary

Posted at 7:45PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mediawhorejolie

28. Jen's psychotic fans will now go into another depression, I know before the day is over, Angie will have had over 300 posts to this news. Congrats Brad & Angie on your growing family.

Posted at 7:46PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Jamie

29. Your rabid defense of these two is bizarre, Mazy. The cutting and being sexual in kindergarten were her own words. Are you saying she does not know what she has done in the past? Are you saying it is at all appropriate that she even discusses this in a public forum? It is not a terrible thing to need therapy, you know. It doesn't make her a bad person. You need to bring her down off the pedestal and realize not everything she does is perfect.

Posted at 7:51PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Mythbreak

30. mediawhorejolie-What is the world are you trying to say? You make no sense. Where do you live that in most married couples one stays home while the other works? Every woman I know who is married also works, whether they have children or not. The family needs both incomes to make it financially. Angelina did not post this in TMZ, TMZ obtained this info. Why call her a media whore? Anyone can obtain notices printed in newspapers as all name change requests must be published by law. These children have as normal a life as do other children of celebrities. Their parents are always with them. You have no foundation to accuse Angelina of as you say "having someone else or soon will". She has Brad and their children, and I'd say she appears very happy and totally satisfied with her life.

Posted at 8:35PM on Apr 24th 2007 by happynews

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments