Pax's New Name -- It's the Pitts!

Click here for pax's documentsAngelina Jolie has filed a petition in L.A. County Superior Court to change the name of her latest adopted child from Pax Thien Jolie to Pax Thien Jolie-Pitt.

In papers filed April 16 and obtained today by TMZ, Angelina -- the sole adoptive parent of Pax -- is requesting the change so it will reflect the last name of her partner, Brad Pitt, and so it is the same as that of her other three children.

Angelina adopted the three-and-a-half-year-old little boy from an orphanage in Vietnam last March.




Filed under: Kids, Brad & Angelina

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 11)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. If you look on Billy Bob's web page he lists Maddox has his son. How did she get him to give up being Maddox's father and Brad becomes his dad. They are so screwed up. I feel bad for all their kids.

Posted at 8:04PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Pat

32. ISN'T THAT SPECIAL

Posted at 8:07PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Hollyweird is full of whack jobs

33. that looks like pitts wax figure.

Posted at 8:10PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mediawhorejolie

34. Changing Pax's name to Jolie - Pitt is a good thing. They all need to have the same last name.

to be let known that they are all the same and welcomed into their home equally.

But if I am not mistaken I have read that the adoption from Brad has never been finalized for Mad and Z...

and nothing is mentioned above about adopting Pax either; just name change....

No matter what happens to Brad or Angie and even thou Angie has been using the kids for attention....Brad needs to always pay attention to them kids like they are his and always will be.

Look at Knicole Kidman and Tom Cruise they both legally adopted their kids and they still are fully involved in their kid's lives and love them both very much even after the divorce.

Of course we can't compare Brad and Angie's adoption to anyone else. Because unlike Brad and Angie no one else used their adopted kids for media attention.

Angie you should be a shamed of yourself!!!!

Adopting is good and lord knows you can afford them and they will probably have a better life finacially with you (I don't know about mentally). But I hope it all works out for them.

I really thought Brad had better class or above all of this mess....but I guess I was mistaken!!!!

Posted at 8:11PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mariag

35. Call me old fashion............... they should get married if they are building this family.

Posted at 8:18PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Juli

36. LOL, Angie is a media whore, slut ! Can't believe Brad fell for her, I too thought he had more class then to go for Angelina, okay she's pretty but that's about it. I never see her carry her own daughter, just the adopoted kids. That's weird.



Posted at 8:21PM on Apr 24th 2007 by mag

37. Have you ever noticed Brad Pitt always ends up resembling the women he's with?

Look at this link??

http://bestweekever.blogs.com/best_week_ever_blog/2006/01/brad_pitt_chame.html


He may be handsome but a whipped man is not a turn on.

Posted at 8:21PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Melonie

38. BBT willingly gave up all and any rights to Maddox in the divorce from Angelina. Angelina became Maddox's only parent at that time, Maddox's last name was always Jolie until it became Jolie-Pitt. BBT left Angelina two weeks after she returned to LA from Namibia with Maddox (where she was making a movie, couldn't leave to go to Cambodia to get Maddox, so Maddox was brought to her on the movie location) with his band and never returned home. BBT never paid child support, and did not stay in contact with Maddox on a regular or any basis after the divorce. BBT has even said that since Angelina lived mostly in England that he seldom saw her or Maddox, but did ASK Angelina how they were doing when she was in LA sometimes. Brad Pitt is the only father Maddox has known or has. BBT can put anything he wants to on his website but that does not make him Maddox's father or make the info on his website accurate.

Posted at 8:23PM on Apr 24th 2007 by anontobe

39. is this a name change.....or an adoption..seems like you have to do a lot more than request a name change on a child when you adopt..then again none of us are Jolie..who knows..I just hope she settles down somewhere....and call somewhere home at least for a month.

Posted at 8:25PM on Apr 24th 2007 by JANET

40. I thought she adopted this child by herself because the law was that an unmarried couple couldn't adopt, but a single parent could? Wonder what that government thinks about her getting around that little issue...

Posted at 8:31PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Valerie

41. #38.
Hope you never request any legal assistance from anyone in my firm, we are very honest and forthright with our clients, and your comment indicates that you may not appreciate anyone who possess those attibutes. What I posted accurately describes adoption statues (laws to you) and procedures, whether you want to accept it or not. That's your problem.

Posted at 8:32PM on Apr 24th 2007 by anon111

42. That little boy really needs to learn how to smile...his pic is a lil scary -

Posted at 8:32PM on Apr 24th 2007 by AdultNoveltyPartyGal

43. mediawhorejolie-What is the world are you trying to say? You make no sense. Where do you live that in most married couples one stays home while the other works? Every woman I know who is married also works, whether they have children or not. The family needs both incomes to make it financially. Angelina did not post this in TMZ, TMZ obtained this info. Why call her a media whore? Anyone can obtain notices printed in newspapers as all name change requests must be published by law. These children have as normal a life as do other children of celebrities. Their parents are always with them. You have no foundation to accuse Angelina of as you say "having someone else or soon will". She has Brad and their children, and I'd say she appears very happy and totally satisfied with her life.

Posted at 8:35PM on Apr 24th 2007 by happynews

44. JANET
See post number 16, it answers your questions.

Posted at 8:35PM on Apr 24th 2007 by anon111

45. Hey No. 14 - Hypocrite Jolie: Are you saying that Angelina and Brad should only adopt ugly, disfigured kids??? That they shouldn't love "cute" kids ??? Speaking of hypocrites - you fill the bill. Let them adopt whomever they want to - you are not paying their bills.

Posted at 8:40PM on Apr 24th 2007 by Sally

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips