Where's Britney's Baby?

Not since Suri has there been a baby mystery of these proportions. We here at TMZ got to thinkin' ... just where has Britney's son Jayden James been? He was born September 12, 2006, and he's really never been seen in public -- except for this shot of his foot.

The only picture we've been able to dig up is reportedly a shot of Jayden, dressed in disguise as a little girl. We can't even verify if that's really him.

It's a whole other Oprah with Britney's oldest, Sean Preston. He's been seen here and there since his birth back in September of 2005.

There are rumors that the divorce settlement between Britney and K-Fed require them not to expose Jayden in public for the prying paparazzi eyes. We've confirmed that is NOT the case.

As for other rumors, we can say for sure that Jayden is just fine and extremely cute to boot.

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 6) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. Well, it sure beats parading them around with their heads covered or in costumes like Wacko Jacko does with his kids. Those are the ones I feel sorry for.

Posted at 5:15PM on Apr 25th 2007 by Julie

47. LOL, #4 Ledbetter you really need to get a life. If you weren't curious about a pic of the baby, then why did you even click on the story link? Most of what is posted on this site is trivial bs, but some people enjoy reading it. TMZ stories are the same as television, if you don't like the program, then don't watch! I for one sometimes feel bad for celebrities and the constant media attention they get, but hey, it comes with the business.

Posted at 6:08PM on Apr 25th 2007 by tia

48. who cares hopefully not with her /

Posted at 8:57PM on Apr 25th 2007 by debae

49.

#38 is totally right .....................


BRITTANY OR KEVIN MAKES A LOUSY PARENTS , THEY'RE JUST DONORS

POOR BABIES .......THE BABIES HAS TO SMELL KEVIN AND BRITTANY SMOKING

THOSE BABIES WILL HAVE SECOND HAND SMOKE FROM IT ................

BRIT AND KEVIN ARE LOUSY IN EVERYTHING THEY DO ....

NANNY IS RAISING THESE BABIES ............

Posted at 9:10PM on Apr 25th 2007 by KEVIN AND BRIT ARE LOUSY PARENTS ...NANNY RAISING THESE BABIES

50. Who Cares! Britney Spears is nothing but nothing! Again, Who Cares!

Posted at 9:35PM on Apr 25th 2007 by Christine

51. WHO cares.NO really i dont.

Posted at 10:01PM on Apr 25th 2007 by rita

52. I think that he has ears like Dumbo and she doen't wan't he made fun of.

Posted at 11:04PM on Apr 25th 2007 by Nola

53. *him* oops

Posted at 11:06PM on Apr 25th 2007 by Nola

54. How funny... one thread with people talking about how it is good that Brit shields her children from the overkill of paps and this thread with people bashing Brit.

Frankly, I am glad her kids are away from the pap...they are on overdrive to capture every breath Brit takes anymore. As if we, the public, cares to know if she passes gas or not.

Posted at 4:47AM on Apr 26th 2007 by YMMV

55. I heard that Britney's children were taken away by Welfare which was the actual cause of her recent break down.

Posted at 6:35AM on Apr 27th 2007 by Cam

56. OK - not that I care, but she probably doesn't have pictures of her kids circulating because it takes all the attention off of her. She's turned into such a drama queen/party girl. None of her BFF's have babies so they'd be dragging her down. Poor kids, they'd be better off with K-Fed. I can't believe I just said that!!!!!

Posted at 7:15AM on Apr 26th 2007 by Vall

57. It is news and alot of the comments on here that prove Britney SHOULD NOT CARE what people think. If she was all over the place with Jayden then you guys would be ripping on her for that. And the fact that some of you have said something negative about an child just shows you really need to GET A LIFE! My goodness people take up a hobby or something. You too TMZ.

Posted at 8:09AM on Apr 26th 2007 by doesn't matter

58. I have read some where that Brit and Fed have worked out a custody agreement that Brit gets the kids 3 days a week and Fed has them the rest of the time. I personally don’t blame Brit for not having her boys out with her; it is too dangerous with all the paparazzi all over her 24-7. I know that I would be scared for my Childs wellbeing if I was her.

Posted at 9:21AM on Apr 26th 2007 by unique

59. ANYBODY READ "US" MAG???? BRITNEY DOESNT REALLY WANT HER BABIES. SHE CALLED THEIR DAD TO PICK THEM UP EARLY ON EASTER, SO SHE COULD GO SHOPPING. BRITNEY HAS TURNED INTO REAL TRASH. SO SORRY FOR THOSE TWO BOYS WHO ARE STILL INFANTS. BRIT IS NOT A TEEN ANY MORE AND TIME FOR HER TO GROW UP AND ACT LIKE A RESPONSIBLE ADULT. HOPE SOMEONE ELSE GETS FULL CUSTODY. SHE IS A HASBEEN-LOT OF NEW ENTERTAINERS HAVE COME SINCE SHE LEFT, AND MY ATTENTION IS FOR THEM. BRIT IS A TRAMP

Posted at 9:53AM on Apr 26th 2007 by JACKIE

60. clearly britney spears child is either suffering from some severe physical disability or mental disability. that or the kid is dead. i figure it's either one, because britney showed off her other kid so much that there has to be something wrong with the new one.


that or it's a girl and she's waiting to pull a surprise.

Posted at 12:14PM on Apr 26th 2007 by cara

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments