Celebrity Justice
Pax -- Even Closer to Becoming a Pitt

TMZ has obtained the required public notices announcing Angelina Jolie's desire to change newly adopted son Pax's last name to Jolie-Pitt.
Click to read!
The law demands that Jolie publish information about the little guy's name change for four consecutive weeks -- in any publication -- so that anyone wishing to legitimately contest the the name change has the proper information to do so.

Sneaky Angelina chose the Daily Commerce, a small legal journal with a circulation of about 800. Fortunately, one of those readers is a TMZ fan! The posting, which has already been published three times, will run one final time in Friday's edition.

Jolie's next court hearing is scheduled for May 31, when Pax is expected to officially become a Jolie-Pitt.



Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Kids, Brad & Angelina

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 4)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. Ugh !!!! I am totally digusted by Angelina Jolie....... after I heard her make a comment about how she doesn't feel the same way about her own biological child ( Shiloh ) that she feels for her adopted children, I was so furious. I can't believe she would make such an awful comment about her own child, Why Brad Pitt stays with her is one I can't figure out. Obviously, from the other comments by people, they have heard the comments she has said too. Lets hope when adorable Shiloh gets older, she doesn't find out about the comments her mother made. Also, is it only me, but I never see Ms. Jolie carrying Shiloh...... theres always pics of her with all the other kids on her hip except for Shiloh. I feel sorry sorry for that little girl, lets hope she gets the attention she deserves from Brad !

Posted at 8:53PM on May 10th 2007 by jaclyn

32. Who gives a rats a$$ about Angeling Jolie ?!? Just another Hollywood flip.

Posted at 11:08PM on May 10th 2007 by lalalala

33. Whilst I can understand why she has done this, I don't find it a good combination of parental surnames. Will she change it back when she dumps him? It would sound better.

Posted at 2:27AM on May 11th 2007 by Charlotte Anne

34. The people who have handed over children to homewrecker Angelina Jolie should never be allowed to work around children ever again.

Jolie looks like a psycho and she proved that years ago by carrying vials of blood around her neck, French kissing her brother (!) in front of paparazzi, getting tattoos of a guy you're with for a few years (if that!).

Homewrecker Brad Pitt is overrated and he deserves the likes of Angelina Jolie. Neither one has real acting talent (and winning an Oscar means zip these days).

Give me a break with these two already!

Posted at 3:16AM on May 11th 2007 by Donna

35. Why not just have a online catalog ordering system set up for these people. Save the jet fuel.
That way they can pick out personality's, hair color, race and size to match their other home accessories. Shipping could be free if under 40 lbs.

Posted at 3:31AM on May 11th 2007 by 1SizeXSmall

36. Have u ever noticed how Jennifer Aniston looks so much YOUNGER than Angelina? Jennifer is 7 years older than her too!!!

Posted at 3:49AM on May 11th 2007 by JACK

37. I agree. Jennifer does look younger.

Posted at 3:52AM on May 11th 2007 by Jaylen

38. parent (s) who have a baby (first born especially) watch and see each movement and act that baby makes. It is a wonder to watch as that very real personality slowly forms minute by minute. It's sad that Ang seems to have missed this part of this bonding process.

Perhaps fear of loving her bio baby more than her adopted children got in the way. By now I'm sure she realizes that her heart just grew bigger to accommodate them all equally and there was never a reason to fear.

Posted at 4:01AM on May 11th 2007 by MoreBlogSmog

39. What a cute family. Seem like nice people.

Posted at 4:16AM on May 11th 2007 by Madeline

40. Brad has aged a lot in the last few years, It shows he has a hard time with his choices at times.
Or at least the way he went about them. I believe when you do something by deception and hurt others it can't turn out happy ever after.

As for Ang, well she saw something she wanted and went about securing the catch the old fashioned way, with a new twist. Rushing to adopt the little girl while the bio plan was getting ready. In plenty of interviews Brad has stated (in the past and I am sure to her when they first met up) that he wanted a little girl. I don't dislike them, but they do deserve each other.

Posted at 4:39AM on May 11th 2007 by NWT

41. *giggles*
Well I see that everybody's got a degree in child psychology in here (not).
Cool, glad she got the name changed so all the kiddos match now.
I think the parents make a cute couple :)
The pics I've seen of them with the children always look nice (well, as nice as you can look when you have 1/2 dozen kids you're trying to herd along and you're being hounded by the paps).
As for the "blob" comment, oh well, some children are daddy's little girl and some end up being mamma's boys. That's just the way life goes.
What's up with the haters? The Jolie-Pitt crew doesn't owe you or I or anybody any sort of explanation about who they want to adopt.
If you think American kids need homes so badly, how many have you signed up for? Oh that's right, none. You just think OTHER people should do this.
I have absolutely no problem with people picking kids out like you would a puppy or a kitten.
Often we pick out the father or mother based soley on looks, do we not?
If so, what's wrong with picking out the child using the same criteria?
There should be no shame in picking out what you like.

Posted at 4:52AM on May 11th 2007 by Bluebelle

42. Homewrecker Brad Pitt is overrated and he deserves the likes of Angelina Jolie. Neither one has real acting talent (and winning an Oscar means zip these days).

Give me a break with these two already!

Posted at 3:16AM on May 11th 2007 by Donna
I know look how many oscars you have .....LMAO

Posted at 7:22AM on May 11th 2007 by bettle

43. Donna #36, thanks for reminding us of her bizarre behavior. She may have she d the Goth look (don't they all get dressed, made up and coiffed by professionals - left to their own devices they look like crap) but her mental health issues are only hidden by those who buy the "beautiful Angelina" facade. Adopting children like puppies, having your own child tossed in the mix will lead to interesting TMZ fodder in the years ahead. A child old enough to know his name, culture, etc., then have it all changed because "Mommy Strangest" is designing children to fit her emotional needs will certainly produce some interesting taboid material for a long time to come. How crazy are these "young starz" compared to past generations who were kept under wraps? Taboid journalism will live forever. Most interesting to watch these "entertainment persons".

Posted at 7:23AM on May 11th 2007 by Barbara

44. Personally, I don't understand why Angelina felt it necessary to change this little 1's name to Pax to begin with. Why not let the fellow keep his birth given name & just give him his new last name.

Posted at 7:31AM on May 11th 2007 by Marla

45. This seems to be one couple that you either love or hate. I don't hate anyone, but I think also that these two deserve each other.. Hes a cheater IMO, and it seems that AJ gets what she goes after...Angelina is a liar, she is constantly changing her story, right now she is doing damage control, because these two have had some really negative press because of her big mouth. I don't think they will stay together, right now Brad is only there because of the kids, and the fact that they both have movies being released. I am a Jennifer fan, since before she married Brad, and I haven't liked Angelina since before she got with Brad..Some of the things she does are good things, but her image is forever tarnished in my book..And her kids will be the ones who suffer the most.

Posted at 9:31AM on May 11th 2007 by someone

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips

Email Alerts