Riled Reese Shoos Away Lensmen

16. Oh God, if it wasn't for the public you wouldn't have to put up with this. Life goes by so fast you will look back and be telling your grandkids about all of the awards and lack of privacy you had. Oh those were the days.

Posted at 2:23PM on May 14th 2007 by Lonely Cat Lady Not

17. I think it's terrible for the kids to be subjected to the leech paparrazi who have no lives at all. Then, you add the pictures with your smug stupid comments. I didn't come to your site to see if Reese Witherspoon went shopping. I wanted to see if you had any celebrity news. I think you all suck.

Posted at 3:04PM on May 14th 2007 by Lynyrd Skynyrd

18. Good for her. They should back off when she's with her kids.

Posted at 2:30PM on May 14th 2007 by Rachel

19. Paparazzi is one step above "crack-whore assistant" in world's worst jobs list.

Posted at 2:31PM on May 14th 2007 by WeAllWillRise

20. This is a shame that they would photograph her kids, its one thing when she is alone but with her kids and she has her hands full and the flash must bother her eyes what if she fell with her son.

The only way we can do anything about this is to stop buy the magazines, and then the pictures stop selling.

Posted at 2:31PM on May 14th 2007 by Nancy

21. Must be a slow news day TMZ!
Pulling out the ol stalker photos.This is interesting because...........

Posted at 2:37PM on May 14th 2007 by Now

22. ...................."Pissy"?!?.................Try protective Mom, and she has EVERY right to go out WITHOUT the maggots crawling all over her and her children...........So, who ever wrote "Pissy" from the TMZ staff............Slap yourself, HARD!!!!!............Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 2:35PM on May 14th 2007 by Old Dog

23. I usually see her smilling for camera even with her kids. What happen this time?

Posted at 2:42PM on May 14th 2007 by sara

24. While I agree that the paps have no business photographing the kids of these celebs, I have to say to the posters that are yelling "Leave the kids alone, they are entitled to their privacy, etc etc", that is all fine and dandy, but what about when Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes kept baby Suri out of the spotlight for months? People weren't commending them for keeping her hidden, they were throwing stones at them, saying the kid was deformed, non-existent, etc. No one was saying "Good for them, shielding their kid away from these mosquitos (the paps). Now that it is a semi-normal star (ie, non-Scientologist or freak), everyone is screaming, "Stay away from the kids." "They didn't sign up for this." "Take a pic of Reese, but leave the kids alone."

As I said, I agree that the blood-thirsty photographers should not be chasing celebs when the kids are with them. It is wrong, etc., but we people sure don't seem to ignore the rags with the pics in them, or avoid articles containing their pics. We are usually ooohing and ahhhing over how cute they are, etc.

Posted at 2:42PM on May 14th 2007 by yesno

25. Mama is fair game, she knew what fame would bring. But really guys... BACK OF THE KIDS!

Posted at 2:42PM on May 14th 2007 by OhGeez

26. 9. Paps have no business shooting the kids.

"SHOOTING THE KIDS" - now that's funny !!!

Posted at 2:45PM on May 14th 2007 by funny hats

27. Do I think stars have a right to get angry when photographed, no! That is part of the game, but leave the children out of it, unless you ask and they say yes. These stars, male or female should have something that would blank out all of your films in the cameras when they have their children with them. I am sure there are such things, if not someone should invent it, they would get rich. Children should be off limits, in all ways, shape or forms. When Brooks 3 year old daughter knew the word paparazzi, that is going to far. Next time Reese, walk over and break their cameras when your kids are with you.

Posted at 2:45PM on May 14th 2007 by LuLu

28. THAT IS THE PRICE YOU PAY WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO LIVE THAT LIFE.

Posted at 2:49PM on May 14th 2007 by lynn

29. #25..........I'm watching you..............................

Posted at 2:55PM on May 14th 2007 by I See You, BOO!

30. I beg to disagree with your comments. Reese and others are not continuously employed. They work a few times a year at most on film projects. The rest of the time is free basically. Many actors choose to live away from the Hollywood madness and fly in when they need to be on the set. There are many happy celebrities living in New England, the Mid West and even in small towns overseas. They can go about their business in relative privacy and lead "normal" lives. If you can't step outside with your kids, go to the supermarket, pick them up at school without hundreds of photographers swarming around you it's time to pack up and move!!

Posted at 2:55PM on May 14th 2007 by Lacy James