Crow's Baby Finally Leaves the Nest

16. UGH! How utterly mean-spirited of TMZ and Harvey Levin. Harvey, you of all people, know perfectly well what promotes Hate and draws Haters. Are you not Jewish? Did you not pay attention in history class?
SHAME on you!

For Godsake, Sheryl is out shopping with her baby. Not her fault the paps are dogging her. Maybe you're just jealous because YOUR creepy shutterbugs didn't get on the scene quick enough!

And it's nobody's freakin business if Sheryl adopts again or not. Btw, the alleged 'bags under her eyes' are probably due to taking good 24/7 care of her baby. SHEESH! (wouldn't want to even imagine what TMZ would have done to Sheryl had a nanny been spotted.)

Tell us why you hate women, Harvey, most specifically women with children? Now *that* would interest me.

Hey, all you Jealous Haters who squat here day and night awaiting your next victim, you're hopeless Losers. Get a JOB.

Deleting TMZ NOW.

Posted at 6:00PM on May 29th 2007 by fed up with harvey

17. SHERYL WHO,,,,,,,,O, OH, OK,,,,,,,,,babys are hip,,,,,,,that's cool i guess, better the kids 2 have money, than 2 struggle..........."TIME 4 A BEER"

Posted at 7:33PM on May 29th 2007 by costaMesaboy

18. baby looks sweet but wonder if there is a cloth diaper and was that not the bottles taht need liners Hey MOM what about mother earth????????????????????

Posted at 8:44PM on May 29th 2007 by my heart

19. Has anyone mentioned her new "partner" that was with her on Good Morning America? Maybe she doesn't have a "male" because she doesn't need one anymore.

You and your family are always welcome in Tennessee.

Posted at 10:56PM on May 29th 2007 by byrd man

20. If Cheryl Crow was any other person who just adopted a baby, we'd all be happy for her. Finally, after working hard to achieve her goals in life, she gets to give love to a child of her own. Sounds to me like a few people posting here need to get real.

As a successful single mom of 2 very happy, well-adjusted teens, I cringe when I hear that kids need 2 parents. They do benefit from the traditional set up as long as both parents are parenting well. However, I know plently of traditional families where both parents are horrible. The mom is "stay-home" and miserable and the dad is a work-a holic.

Let Cheryl alone.We only saw her pictures because the paparazzi followed her and hounded her while she is just trying to be a mom. Let the woman bask in the joy of new motherhood...single or not...it's pure.

Posted at 6:42AM on May 30th 2007 by Realitydose

21. One of the problems with our society is that we have become so judgmental of each other. Sheryl Crow wanted a child,this child needed a home=family. Who are we to judge how loved and well cared for this child will be by Sheryl?
The church I attend welcomes anyone and embraces diversity, Many gay couples who attend have adopted and have bilogical children . I teach these children in Sunday School.. They are very loved,well taken care of and well adjusted. The parents are very involved in thier lives. I am also a public school treacher...not the same scenario for MANY kids!
Shouldn't we be supporting each other instead of judging?

Posted at 7:38AM on May 30th 2007 by Diane

22. Congrats to Sheryl Crow! I think people should let her enjoy her new baby. The fact that she took him shopping does not mean that she is trying to get media attention. If she lives in that area, what is she supposed to do -- never take her son out of the house? Of course, she would like to shop with her child like every other mom in America.

Posted at 8:21AM on May 30th 2007 by Ashley

23. Do you want her to become a shut in? It's been two weeks...she's allowed to take her child out into the world without it being considered catering to the paparazzi.

She is allowed to adopt even though she is single. And yes it will be easier for her because she has more money than most single parents. None of that is her fault and she doesn't deserve to be blamed for it.

Posted at 8:12AM on May 30th 2007 by Lex

24. If you go to one of her concerts, don't sit down wind! I did. Thought the guy if front of me had eaten too many beans the day before. Turns out, it was from the stage. One square of TP doesn't do the job for her eather!

SHE'S STINKY!

Posted at 8:23AM on May 30th 2007 by Good nose

25. That is not the reason Lance and Sheryl broke up, because he didn't want anymore children. There were many other factors that came into play. I think perhaps she simply wanted to get out and do some shopping and instead of leaving her son at home with the nanny, she took him and the nanny along.

Posted at 8:16AM on May 30th 2007 by Brenda

26. I am amazed at how close minded people are. The operative word poster number 2 is KNOWINGLY. I am knowingly doing the same thing. Most disfunctional homes have TWO parents in them. I grew up in a single parent home with a huge extended family and give my children the same thing. Should I settle because I am 40 and have not met a man compatible for marriage or should I just enter into an unhappy union? Maybe add to the stats that 10 MILLION AMERICAN COUPLES ARE IN SEXLESS MARRIAGES, which means they have sex less than 8 times a year? I know people who are KNOWINGLY raising children in disfunction 2 parent homes and why should I be denied a family because I am single. Your view is primarily why America is going down fast.

But good luck to you anyway
Q

Posted at 8:30AM on May 30th 2007 by Quinnette

27. High profile adoptive parents make it look so easy .....where are the pictures of the ARMY of nannies, personal assistants, and security guards and personal attorneys, financial advisers, etc.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..... that most parents don't have!

Posted at 8:46AM on May 30th 2007 by ncunicorn

28. I think it is nice that Sheryl Crow adopted a baby. I am all for single people adopting. I wish her and her cute little baby all the best.

Posted at 8:29AM on May 30th 2007 by NADINE

29. Why does everyone have to be so negative and bitter? Can't anyone just be happy for her and her son? Who knows what kind of life the child may have had, had she not adopted him. Let's just be glad that another child will be provided for and have a good life, not be brought up in horrible and unhappy conditions. Would everyone rather the kid sit in an orphanage or be shipped from foster home to foster home all his life? I'm sure any kind of life that she can give him will be better than the one he came from. Any mother that is willing to give her child up for adoption is clearly on hard times and is just trying to do what is best for the child she loves. Now this little boy has 2 moms that love him more than the world. Let them be happy.

Posted at 8:29AM on May 30th 2007 by Amy

30. It seems that babies are the new Hollywood accessory. Those who've grown tired of toting a chihuahua in a purse are now schlepping along a baby, preferrably adopted, and preferrably from outside of the US. (Has anyone noticed the amazing number of children here at home who need love and attention?)

Good for Sheryl Crow, Madonna and all others who are now choosing parenthood.

But, seriously, this is something that millions of women across the US do every day... without designer clothing, without nannies, without media exposure...thanklessly, day in and day out.

Hold up a "regular" woman --- give her some praise and recognition for rising to the challenges of parenting and then, maybe, I'll be impressed.

Posted at 12:22PM on May 30th 2007 by concerned1