Celebrity Justice
Pax a Pitt!

Pax Jolie-Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Brad PittTMZ was in a Los Angeles County Superior Court this morning as little Pax Thien Jolie officially became the newest member of the Jolie-Pitt tribe, having Pitt legally added to his last name. Who's your daddy?!

Pax Thien Jolie-Pitt is the third adopted child of Angelina Jolie to take the name of A-list dadfriend, Brad Pitt. Angelina adopted the 3-year-old boy from an orphanage in Southern Vietnam earlier this year.

As TMZ first reported, as part of the petition for name change, the child's new name was published in a legal journal for four weeks in support of the petition.

Fathers & Sons: click to launch



Tags: Angelina Jolie, AngelinaJolie, Brad Pitt, BradPitt, Pax Jolie-Pitt, PaxJolie-pitt

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 6 of 6) Previous 15 Comments

76. # 71

OMG, give me a break. You make it sound like Brad & Angie are the ONLY people on earth and THEY are our creators. With all the praise you gave those two, you must believe in god and be religious. Obviously, you have had nothing bad happen in your life.

Posted at 9:51AM on Jun 1st 2007 by ...

77. I'm sorry, but parents in those other countries really need to concentrate on birth control and quit being so selfish and have kids. KNOWING they can't take care of a child, they STILL have them and allow them to suffer. Very stupid and selfish. And yes, the problem is here is the USA too.

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 1st 2007 by ...

78. In defense of my own post:

I said new parents are suppose to take "3 months" (not a lifetime). To stay at home with there newly adopted child to bond with them. No outside influences. Not even grandparents. This way the child bonds with two people that are going to be his/ hers parents. Not a nanny , not a school teacher, not a flight attendant not the hotel maid. I speak from experience!!!! Pax is not an infant he is 3 years old. He needs to fall in love with his new mother and father and this needs to happen by being with these people everyday and night for at least 3 months. Ask any psychologist they will agree. It doesn't matter who the parents are. Brad, Angelina or the Pope a process is a process and as far as i am concerned it is already too late. That's why he has sad eyes. Angelina is not a good mother. I don't care what anyone says.

Posted at 9:11PM on Jun 4th 2007 by justme

79. SHE IS ONLY DOING IT, (ADOPTING KIDS) CAUSE SHE IS BORED. WHAT ABOUT HER OWN CHILD, JUST BARLEY A YEAR OLD, AND THAT POOR CHILD HAS TO COMPETE WITH ALL OF THE ADOPTED KIDS FOR HER MOMMY ATTENTION. MAYBE WHEN SHE TAKES THAT YR. OFF, SHE SHOULD TAKE THE TIME TO GET TO KNOW HER OWN BIOLOGICAL CHILD, YA KNOW, THE ONE THAT SHE PLANNED TO HAVE, WHEN HE WAS STILL MARRIED....THAT DIRTY HOMEWRECKER

Posted at 12:01PM on Jun 1st 2007 by irishmommy

80. There is nothing wrong with having one child is there?I dont understand why just because you love children you have to have 8 of them. As a mother myself I know that i cannot have more than one because it is so mentally and physically draining. I love it but it is hard work. In my opinion, having 4,5 ,6 ,7 .,8 kids is wrong and should not be allowed. There is no way that all of the children will feel loved equally and will get enough from their parents. IMPOSSIBLE! You are only human!

Posted at 2:08PM on Jun 1st 2007 by GIRL

81. Just because they also have Brad's last name, does not mean he is their Dad. And Angie only bought the kids for a tax write off. I mean, isn't that why people have kids?

Posted at 3:56PM on Jun 1st 2007 by ...

82. I don't understand why they don't get married. I don't think they will last. I think she going to wake uo one day and wish she had not done this and what will happen to all these kids?

Posted at 11:33PM on Jun 5th 2007 by needs help

83. Dear Angelina and Brad, I think its great that you both desire to adopt children because there are so many unwanted...but, if you aren't into american kids(just not exotic enough)then perhaps you could really do some good and in the style of Mia Farrow, adopt a child faced with a severe disability...these are the children that no one really wants,as I am sure you know...a couple more nannies ought to help you raise them too.If you really want to help out the children with the hardest futures before them, then with out a doubt, a handicaped child ought to do the publicity,oops, I mean trick.You won't have to spend too much time fussing over the child,you can still spend the majority of your time away from home as long as you keep that team of nannies,you should be fine and can still take the credit for raising them...you saint you...at least this addiction beats your heroine,knives,tattoo and maneating disorder...lotsa luck.

Posted at 9:14AM on Jun 6th 2007 by okay

84. LOL #63 your killing me...Lmao

Posted at 6:51AM on Jun 11th 2007 by tKat

85. #81 I had a co worker that adopted and she had to take 3 months of and was told to bond with her kid and yes other were to stay away.

#63 I AM Still Laughing - macaroni comment was pricless.

And this is not real important news it is the equivalent of the Star & other tabloids. Personally I don't like them. I believe as well adopting all these kids is just for publicity nothing more. I hope they have a good life though. I also read that she called her own kid Shiloh a privileaged blob, which I thought was pretty stupid to say in an interview. What makes her so privleage just cause she was born to her. For petes sakes she just turn a year old what kind of privileages is she receving ... a bottle??? There are children in America that need to be adopted as well, if they can't adopt right away they could foster them til they could adopt.

Posted at 7:17AM on Jun 11th 2007 by blob

86. I can't believe the amount of racists on here. Thats what I hate about you Americans. Most of you seem so RACIST. "whats wrong with adopting an American child" (oh the WHOLE WORLD revolves around AMERICA, you white supremacists), the "dark children", "big lips" etc etc. The majority of you Americans seem to be card-carrying KKK members! Americans are so DEEPLY RACIST and insular and inward-looking. All they think about is THEMSELVES. America is the richest country on earth, and even the poorest child in America is RICH compared to children in impoverished nations. To be FAIR, its only right to concentrate on those MOST IN NEED, which is no one in America but people in third world countries. The irony of people attacking Angelina's character and insinuating she is somehow "immoral" yet then turn around and attack INNOCENT CHILDREN, pick on the size of their lips, call then "dark" etc etc is astounding. ANgelina has more morals than most on this board ever would in FIVE LIFETIMES! I am so glad I don't live in America, I'd leave it shame at the fact that the majority of people in America are so racist and America appears to be the most racist country on earth.

And how many times do these stupid lies and rumours need to be debunked?
1. Angelina did not "steal" Brad. Brad is a HUMAN BEING, not a car, or money that can be stolen. It is NOT POSSIBLE to "steal" a man from anyone. Only stupid immature children would say "steal". These are little children who have no experience in ADULT relationships.

2. There is NO such thing as a "homewrecker". It simply doesn't exist. No one from outside a marriage can "wreck" a home/marriage. Two people are responsible for entering a marriage and it is those very same 2 people in the marriage that are SOLELY responsible for ending a marriage. NO ONE can break up a marriage. In adult relationships, it simply isn't possible.

3. There is no proof, not one SHRED of evidence that Brad cheated. Only a bunch os stupid and gullible people believing all the LIES in the tabloids. All THREE of them all say it had nothing to do with Angelina. There is not one iota of evidence that Brad cheated.

4. Angelina has not "homewrecked" anyone's marriage. Despite the fact that its an oxymoron and absolutely impossible to do anyway, BBT was single when he came into Angelina's life, and Brad was in the process of getting a divorce (ie virtually single) when he and Angelina finally got together. Same with Jen, who within TWO WEEKS of filing for divorce, was in a relationship with Vince (why aren't people calling Vince a "homewrecker"?). She is not a 'maneater' nor a "homewrecker".

5. She did NOT 'tongue' her brother, you racists and xenophobes. She gave him a quick kiss ON the mouth, that is ALL. In many cultures, you ignorant and racist Americans, it is CUSTOM to greet your relatives with a kiss ON THE LIPS. That is all Angelina did. A very short kiss ON the lips. NO tongue involved. In New Zealand, the Maoris greet their relatives and friends by RUBBING NOSES. Is that "weird" too, all you xenophobic racists? Show a bit of class you people, and don't be so culturally intolerant and racist. Don't fear other cultures.

6. Wearing a tiny minute vial of blood of her HUSBAND is such a wierd crime? You small-minded bigots. In some countries, people do that. It is a very intimate and personal thing, and is beautiful. It doesn't make her 'weird' or a 'freak', simply different. The aholes on here who are such racist xenophobic bigots who attack anyone who is different from their white supremacist western superior self are most likely the same people who would have been class bullies and pick on someone who is in a wheelchair. WHY are some people SO intensely afraid and intolerant of people who are "different"? Why the xenophobia? We are all different, we are not supposed to be the same. Differences should be CELEBRATED, not turned into a crime. Its ok to be different. Its natural and normal. What is abnormal is to be AFRAID and disgusted with people JUST BECAUSE they are 'different'. It is what causes racism, bigotry, wars, hatred and prejudice. Being xenophobic is what is really weird.

7. From the last one, commenting on someone's past which is exactly that PAST, from a whole DECADE AGO is extremely immature and quite frankly, a desperate argument. No one stays the same. We all change. Although, with some of you lot, I wonder. I sincerely hope that is true for you shallow, superficial small-minded racist bigots. Hopefully you can change your dangerous hateful mindset.

8. She doesn't adopt for "publicity". NO ONE takes on another HUMAN BEING for the duration of that human's life, an entire lifetime, for a little publicity. If that is what you sick bigots think, you clearly don't value human life and I hope you are never parents. Besides, Angelina doesn't need that, she has all the publicity she could ever want, just by being the humanitarian and UN GOODWILL AMBASSADOR she is.

9. Doing humanitarian and charity work for "publicity". As ridiculous as above, but also denotes ignorance. Hello people, she is a UN AMBASSADOR. If you go to their site and read the charter and what is involved, the DUTY of a Goodwill Ambassador is to USE their celebrity status to BRING *PUBLICITY* to other countries plights. In other words, its her JOB to publicise what shes doing and where. She HAS to, its her JOB!!! She's not just a celeb writing a cheque, she has a high level RESPONSIBILITY, a position which the terms and agreements are that she MUST publicise what she does. Before spouting off in such an ill-informed manner, RESEARCH what her involvement with the UN is, and why she must do the publicity, instead of making ill-founded slurs and assumptions about someone who is just 'doing their job'.

These are the main myths and slanderous slurs made against an innocent woman that need to be debunked. I'm sure there are other un-founded and ill-informed bigoted assertions made about her, but these are the most common uttered by the deeply phobic racists in America. Attacking an innocent woman who has done nothing but help people and who has never hurt anyone is as dispicable and as low as you can go, and none of you cruel lowlife bigots would even have 1 thousandth the morals, integrity and heart that Angelina has.

Posted at 11:03AM on Jun 13th 2007 by Jenhasnomoralsorclass

Previous 15 Comments