Celebrity Justice
Birkhead Sues Opri for Fraud, Malpractice

Birkhead - OpriLarry Birkhead just filed a lawsuit against Debra Opri for allegedly defrauding him out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In a lawsuit filed Friday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Birkhead claims an MSNBC reporter hooked him up with her. He says Opri said she was willing to represent him free of charge, because "the publicity from her representation of Plaintiff would greatly benefit Opri's legal career." Birkhead says shortly after hiring Opri, he did an interview with the MSNBC reporter who was asking questions about confidential documents she shouldn't have had. Birkhead says Opri told him she had given the reporter the confidential info as "payback for the client referral."

As TMZ first reported, Birkhead made a deal with NBC Universal for $1,050,000 to appear on various shows. The initial check to Birkhead was for $865,000. Birkhead says without his consent, Opri deposited the money in her client trust account. Indeed, Birkhead claims he "specifically advised Opri that she was not authorized to take control or possession of any of the funds..." Opri then turned over $200,000, leaving $665,000 in the trust account.

Birkhead, who claims conversion, fraud and legal malpractice, says he repeatedly demanded that Opri release the money but she refused. Birkhead then fired her.

Birkhead's suit then details another TMZ story, that after Opri was fired, she sent him a bill for $620,492.84 for legal services, which included charges for expensive dinners, Opri's publicist, and even her husband's laundry. Birkhead claims many of the charges were for Opri's "personal aggrandizement."

Birkhead further alleges in the suit that "Opri placed her own career desires and needs as a priority over the needs, interests and desires of her own client."

Birkhead also claims Opri represented herself as a specialist in California family law, but says the representation was false and she knew it.

Birkhead is seeking at least $885,000 in damages. He is also asking for punitive damages and rescission of any fee agreements Birkhead claims he signed under fraudulent pretenses.



Reader Comments

(Page 40 of 41) Previous 15 Comments | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

586. Larry is very busy suing, just like his guru and mentor, howie. When does he have time for the baby he wanted so badly? The one that Debra Opri helped him to get the paternity and custody resolved for.

What's the status of this law suit? Anyone know?

http://www.tmz.com/2007/04/18/birkhead-not-fan-tab-u-lous-lawsuit-imminent/

Posted at 12:24AM on Jun 11th 2007 by pj no likee howee, moe, and now larry, sue me woodee

587. Bix and Bob - you both are liars. You WILL watch Gretch and Larry King, otherwise, you would not be here keeping up with everything.

Posted at 12:09PM on Jun 11th 2007 by orig JMO

588. 582.
Re:A good person does not violate the terms of a legal contract. You need a reality check!

Posted at 8:34PM on Jun 10th 2007 by canuck

Canuck, you are wrong. It is good person and an extremely smart person that questions and illegal contract and has the intestinal fortitude to stand up and fight it in court. You need to turn your negative energy into something more positive and good.

I guess you will be one of those tuning into Gret and Larry King specials Monday and Tuesday to watch Larry and his daughter. You love watching the coverage and keeping up with all the latest on this case. You cannot give it up. Do you have the courage to change the chanel to watch something you are interested in? I would say no you are not. You WANT and LOVE this story. otherwise you would not be here.


Posted at 10:29PM on Jun 10th 2007 by orig JMO

===============================================================

Birkhead had all the opportunity he wanted to pose any questions he so chose during an arbitration of this matter, an arbitration that Birkhead himself agreed to in a legally binding contract. Instead, Birkhead chose to thumb his nose at the agreement HE signed, his former attorney and the law - the mark of a dishonourable individual.

Regarding the infantile balance of your blog, I suggest to you that you are obsessed with this story, given the amount of time you spend on this blog.

Posted at 11:37AM on Jun 11th 2007 by canuck

589. Canack - You are here when I am here, so we both must be obsessed with this case.

Also to your remark "Birkhead had all the opportunity he wanted to pose any questions he so chose during an arbitration of this matter, an arbitration that Birkhead himself agreed to in a legally binding contract. Instead, Birkhead chose to thumb his nose at the agreement HE signed, his former attorney and the law - the mark of a dishonourable individual

Why go to arbitration when the charges are illegal. Again, THE LAW SUPERCEDES ANY SIGNED CONTRACT. No contract is legally binding when the contract is not written by the law!!! What is it about that, that you do not understand. Just because you sign a contract does not mean it is binding if it is not written by the law. Why is it you do see the how important the attorney/client confidentially agreement is?? Debra broke this severly. ok so you don't like Larry, which I don't understand, since you do not know him. But you could step back and look at the case and not the individuals. Look at the law. Larry has broken none, Debra has broken many. That is a fact.

My Infantile blog?? Oh please... Open your mind and see the whole picture. You are stuck in your own one dimensional world. You only see in black and white.

Posted at 12:09PM on Jun 11th 2007 by orig JMO

590. No I won't! I don't want to see such pathetic man. Conning Anna so he could take her money and spend it on his boyfriends.

Posted at 12:42PM on Jun 11th 2007 by bix

591. 590. Canack - You are here when I am here, so we both must be obsessed with this case.

Also to your remark "Birkhead had all the opportunity he wanted to pose any questions he so chose during an arbitration of this matter, an arbitration that Birkhead himself agreed to in a legally binding contract. Instead, Birkhead chose to thumb his nose at the agreement HE signed, his former attorney and the law - the mark of a dishonourable individual

Why go to arbitration when the charges are illegal. Again, THE LAW SUPERCEDES ANY SIGNED CONTRACT. No contract is legally binding when the contract is not written by the law!!! What is it about that, that you do not understand. Just because you sign a contract does not mean it is binding if it is not written by the law. Why is it you do see the how important the attorney/client confidentially agreement is?? Debra broke this severly. ok so you don't like Larry, which I don't understand, since you do not know him. But you could step back and look at the case and not the individuals. Look at the law. Larry has broken none, Debra has broken many. That is a fact.

My Infantile blog?? Oh please... Open your mind and see the whole picture. You are stuck in your own one dimensional world. You only see in black and white.

Posted at 12:09PM on Jun 11th 2007 by orig JMO

=============================================================

LMAO I can't remember the last day I was on this blog, but I've no doubt you are here everyday bar none!

"Charges illegal"? WTF are you talking about "illegal"??? Kindly explain that one.

"No contract is binding when not written by the law". Again, WTF are you talking about??? Where is the law located? Does it have a street address and regular business hours???
LMAO you are clueless.

The contract was agreed to by Birkhead, as evidenced by Birkhead's signature. Do you not understand that???? It is a legally binding contract, whether you like it or not, and your pretty boy Birkhead agreed to the terms therein.

LMAO at the "charges illegal" comment you made!!!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL

Posted at 2:40PM on Jun 11th 2007 by canuck

592.

Just visit Artharris.com, get the lastest. Deb Opri tells all. This is getting nasty.

Posted at 3:31PM on Jun 11th 2007 by Kentucky Boy

593. JMO you are a liar about me watching Larry on Greta and Larry King. My wife and I will not be watching him. Stop calling folks liars not nice. Get some manners. I have a right to voice my opinion also not just you. I also think Opri is right. I am waiting to see how this plays out in the courts. jmho

Posted at 3:34PM on Jun 11th 2007 by BOB

594. Cannuck Your post ""No contract is binding when not written by the law". Again, WTF are you talking about??? Where is the law located? Does it have a street address and regular business hours???
LMAO you are clueless.

Where is the Law located?? Canuck. You are kiding me right?? The laws are decided by the people we vote into office. Whether it be state officials or Washington DC officials. This country is based on laws and government. You don't really think Debra or anyone else can just make up a legal binding contract and can put anything in it, and make up your own rules, do you? Contracts can cover anything they want , but legal issues are goverened by the laws decided and voted on by officials.

That said, Attorneys are licensed/registered representatives of the court system. They have laws they must obide by. Pardon me
Canuck, but It is not me that doesn't have a clue.

Did you know that laws are on the books in some states that you cannot spit on the sidewalk? And a law that says no oral sex, even if you are married? There use to be a law on flag burning and draft card burning, don't know if it still exists. But you CAN be arrested for ANY of these things. Why? Because all are AGAINST the law. Sheesh, I feel like I am talking to a door.

Posted at 5:48PM on Jun 11th 2007 by YOU don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

595. Odd. This You don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ character must be another personality of JMO. Not that it matters. Perhaps JMO can explain tongue in cheek comments to You do\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\. LMAO

Anyway, that retainer agreement was an ordinary retainer agreement and I have drafted countless of those over the past 3 decades. There is nothing illegal in the retainer agreement that Birkhead willingly signed, nor is there anything illegal in Opri putting a lien on those monies in trust so as to protect her outstanding account.

If you disagree, kindly post a link proving that the content of that retainer agreement is illegal. Learning can be fun, you should try it sometime! ;)

Posted at 6:11PM on Jun 11th 2007 by canuck

596. re: Canuck: "596. Odd. This You don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ character must be another personality of JMO. Not that it matters. Perhaps JMO can explain tongue in cheek comments to You do\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\. LMAO

Anyway, that retainer agreement was an ordinary retainer agreement and I have drafted countless of those over the past 3 decades. There is nothing illegal in the retainer agreement that Birkhead willingly signed, nor is there anything illegal in Opri putting a lien on those monies in trust so as to protect her outstanding account.

If you disagree, kindly post a link proving that the content of that retainer agreement is illegal. Learning can be fun, you should try it sometime! ;)


Posted at 6:11PM on Jun 11th 2007 by canuck
I am the orig JMO, sorry forgot to change back.

We are talking about much more than a retainer agreement, it is deeper than that. And I would agree that it is not illegal to put a lien on something but the question to be decided is, Did opri illegally transfer/deposit the funds that belonged to Larry without Larry's permission. If she did, THAT is illegal and punishable by law. Many, if not most contracts have retainer agreements. But that said, those can also be cancelled if a contractor, attorney or whomever is not doing a good job, by the person paying the retainer. You may lose the retainer money in the process, but you can cancel the service of the contractor. If you deal in contracts, you know this. I guess I am following the case so intently because it is such an interesting and complicated case and the law aspects interest me. ANyway, gotta go, super is on. Talk later Canuck.Been fun. I love to debate. That is the way we all learn. The secret to learning is listening (in this case, reading posts) and weight everything and being open minded to all aspects.

Peace

Posted at 6:42PM on Jun 11th 2007 by YOU don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

597. re: Canuck: "596. Odd. This You don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ character must be another personality of JMO. Not that it matters. Perhaps JMO can explain tongue in cheek comments to You do\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\. LMAO

Anyway, that retainer agreement was an ordinary retainer agreement and I have drafted countless of those over the past 3 decades. There is nothing illegal in the retainer agreement that Birkhead willingly signed, nor is there anything illegal in Opri putting a lien on those monies in trust so as to protect her outstanding account.

If you disagree, kindly post a link proving that the content of that retainer agreement is illegal. Learning can be fun, you should try it sometime! ;)


Posted at 6:11PM on Jun 11th 2007 by canuck
I am the orig JMO, sorry forgot to change back.

We are talking about much more than a retainer agreement, it is deeper than that. And I would agree that it is not illegal to put a lien on something but the question to be decided is, Did opri illegally transfer/deposit the funds that belonged to Larry without Larry's permission. If she did, THAT is illegal and punishable by law. Many, if not most contracts have retainer agreements. But that said, those can also be cancelled if a contractor, attorney or whomever is not doing a good job, by the person paying the retainer. You may lose the retainer money in the process, but you can cancel the service of the contractor. If you deal in contracts, you know this. I guess I am following the case so intently because it is such an interesting and complicated case and the law aspects interest me. ANyway, gotta go, super is on. Talk later Canuck.Been fun. I love to debate. That is the way we all learn. The secret to learning is listening (in this case, reading posts) and weight everything and being open minded to all aspects.

Peace

Posted at 6:41PM on Jun 11th 2007 by Orig JMO.

598. That still leaves Larry $44507.16.
Don't you think that's plenty considering she did lead the way for him to get his daughter?

My God Almighty, Greedy Guy, get over yourself. I am sure he will make 5 times that amount in 2 weeks time.....

PAY UP LARRY- IT"S YOUR BILL..

YOU DO NOT GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING IN THE US, UNLESS YOU ARE AN ILLEGAL........................

Posted at 6:15PM on Jun 12th 2007 by I pay my bills

599.

Howard and Larry,

You are in all our prayers and we are sorry for you loss. Please stick together and Dannielynn will be fine. You both have our support. Please do not let Virgie near the baby. Anna was in a dysfunctional home and it did not serve her well. Howard you especially have all our love and continued support. We know the truth and we love you for the friendship and love Anna and you shared. You are well respected. God Bless You.

Posted at 4:51PM on Jun 13th 2007 by Team Howard and Larry

600. Kushy,

You make some very interesting points.

In the subject matter of Virgie's attorney, O'Quinn, supposedly he knows what he is doing.

Hopefully a very astute P.I. did some very thorough investigating into the matter.

If it is true that O'Quinn is a top notch attorney, then he probably has a number of extremely qualified professionals looking into all avenues to make sure that JUSTICE PREVAILS for Daniel and Anna.

I sincerely hope that he and all the other professionals involved will not quit till the responsible individuals are PUT BEHIND BARS!!!

Posted at 5:11PM on Jun 14th 2007 by tweety

Previous 15 Comments | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments