Fashion
Auntie Jen Shops for Lil' Crow

Posted Jun 4th 2007 2:51PM by TMZ Staff

With no children to call her own, Jennifer Aniston indulged her maternal side by shopping for good pal Sheryl Crow's newly adopted baby, Wyatt.
Sheryl Crow Jennifer Aniston
TMZ has learned that Jen hit Neiman Marcus in Beverly Hills and dropped over a thousand bucks on three Kaloo plush toys for the little newborn. A well-placed source tells us the 38-year-old left a note to include with the gifts that read: "Dear Wyatt, Welcome to the World! xxoo Jen." Awww!

Miss Aniston needn't worry; advancements in fertility should give her plenty of time to decide if she wants to conceive a lil' friend of her very own!

Related

Article



Filed under: Baby Watch, Jennifer Aniston, Full Throttle Fashion


Tags: jennifer aniston, JenniferAniston, sheryl crow, SherylCrow

Comments [64]
SphereBookmark and Share
4ie6

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 5) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. I'm happy to see cheryl with here baby. I'm just hoping she isn't trying to fill a "void" in her life, and just really wanted to have a baby. And for jen to drop that amount of $, cheap ass bitch !. Why is it that the rich is sooo cheap??.

Posted at 4:14PM on Jun 4th 2007 by NY YANKEES

2. Cute little guy....

The way the picture is staged it looks as though its "all about Sheryl" though possibly she's a lot more affectionate behind the scenes. She is a former teacher so should be a good and attentive Mom when she's not on the road!

Posted at 4:18PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Sunshine.

3. Wyatt is adorable...Good Luck Sheryl..you look like a Happy Mommie holding a beautiful son....Congradulations to you both

Posted at 4:19PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Pilikea

4. Cute toys, but three toys for $1000? Why?!?!

Posted at 4:19PM on Jun 4th 2007 by colene

5. OOOPS, SHERYL...........sorry !! type-o stupid :)

Posted at 4:19PM on Jun 4th 2007 by NY YANKEES

6. Over a grand for three plush toys? Man, the rich are different......and stupid.

Posted at 4:21PM on Jun 4th 2007 by West Coastian

7. That is one pissed off Baby.

They should have named him Stewie.

Posted at 4:21PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Ra

8. I respect Jen for not having kids she doesn't want them she's not ready for them why rush? Some women aren't cut out for motherhood and i respect the ones who know this. If she had a kid she be like angie and leaving them with nanny's working then people would complain.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Dawn

9. YANKEES..........

Money isn't everything. Just because you have money, doesn't mean you need to spend it. It was the THOUGHT that counted. Idiot.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 4th 2007 by ... bye

10. It looks like a picture of a mother who recently gave birth. What's with the bathrobe? You did not give birth to this baby cheryl.

Posted at 4:24PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Marvin

11. It looks so contrived when they photograph someone
who has just 'thrown on a robe'
but they have 10 pounds of makeup on their face.

Congrats though Cheryl!
He looks like he's gonna be a real asskicker

Posted at 4:25PM on Jun 4th 2007 by Ra

12. BYE,
I know it was the thought that counts, but a grand to them = like 20 bucks compared to "regular" peoples salary. No biggie. And I'm not an idiot jackass. :)

Posted at 4:29PM on Jun 4th 2007 by NY YANKEES

13. LOL :-)

Posted at 4:31PM on Jun 4th 2007 by ... bye

14. In this day and age where we are all so consicence of tremendous poverty and starving children in our country I don't think I would brag about spending a thousand dollars on 3 stupid stuffed animals. I think her money could have been put to better use else where. Go figure.

Posted at 4:36PM on Jun 4th 2007 by DallasDeb8

15. Jennifer just made 1000 possible suitors head for the hills with that action. Nobody likes a single girl buying baby things- it sends off one hell of a signal. She wants a baby of her own.

Posted at 4:38PM on Jun 4th 2007 by WeAllWillRise

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments