Celebrity Justice
Is "Knocked Up" a Knockoff?

Knocked UpA Canadian author is suing Universal Pictures and director Judd Apatow (who directed "40-Year-Old Virgin"), alleging that the story for the hit movie "Knocked Up" was taken directly from her book of the same name.

Rebecca Eckler claims that she shopped around her 2004 book to be made into a movie. In the middle of the process, she learned of the Apatow project. The script that was making the rounds, she alleges, had a picture of a martini glass with a pacifier around the stem -- the same as on the cover of her book.

Eckler, who told her tale in this month's Maclean's magazine, cites other similarities -- including the fact that the Katherine Heigl character is an up-and-coming television reporter, and the main character in Eckler's book is an up-and-coming newspaper reporter. She also says that the movie and book have a secondary female character in common -- the person that both main characters go to for advice -- and that both of the secondary characters have screaming children.

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in January, alleging copyright infringement and seeking unspecified damages.

Judd Apatow, through his reps, released this statement: "The book 'Knocked Up' is very different than the film 'Knocked Up.' The book is about a woman who gets pregnant by the fiance that she loves on the night of her engagement party. The film is a very different story; the film is about a one-night stand between a pot smoking slacker and an ambitious young woman that leads to a pregnancy and their attempts to get to know each other. Anyone who reads the book and sees the movie will instantly know that they are two very different stories about a common experience."

Universal Pictures had no comment.



Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 2) Previous 15 Comments

16. it's bs. when does a script go around with a picture (per her claim of a script with a picture of a martini with a pacifier just like the cover of her book) on it? I mean, c'mon! I've NEVER in all the years of reading scripts in all different stages of movie making have I seen one with a picture. I smell a bs lawsuit and a lot of doors closed to someone who's showing herself to be a litigious pain in the arse.

Posted at 6:03PM on Jun 6th 2007 by pup

17. I wonder if scumbag Tom Brady will catch this flick. Hey Tommy boy. You just joined all the other assholes out there who knocks up a woman and then takes off.

Posted at 4:42PM on Jun 6th 2007 by robbie

18. I would just like to say that maybe I should get in on this lawsuit too. This exact "story" happened to me in real life. We named him Jack.

Posted at 5:21PM on Jun 6th 2007 by Jessica

19. Does anyone think that getting drunk and pregnant is such an original plot that it would have to have been ripped off? Eckler is a known egomaniac whose book is her OWN diary about basically, getting fat, smoking during pregnancy and having a non-medical c-section because the baby interfered with her lifestyle. she's an awful person and an awful writer.

Rogen is Jewish and Canadian, and in the Apatow/Rogen projects "Undeclared" and "the 40 Year Old Virgin" his characters were also Canadian and Jewish. There is absolutely no case here for Eckler and anyone who buys her sob story is a fool who hasnt done one lick of research of the massive differences between the two works

Posted at 5:22PM on Jun 6th 2007 by Goon

20. Oh wow, someone had already written a book about a young woman who was "up and coming" in her profession, but was hit with an unplanned pregnancy? That story is SO ORIGNAL no one would ever come up with it separately!

AND she had a best friend she goes to for advice? The similiarities never stop!

(End sarcasm)

Posted at 8:02PM on Jun 6th 2007 by El Grande

21. great movie!

that book sounds nothing like the moview OR Fools rush in for that matter (Matthew Perry's character is a rich businesman in that one). That lady just wants a handout to compensate for her failing career.

Posted at 6:34PM on Jun 6th 2007 by glee

22. this movie was such a disappointment. there were defintely some funny moments, but there is no way in hell she would EVER have gone out with him again. they screwed, she was disgusted, then she tells him 2 months later that she's preggo and he starts screaming and swearing at her in public. i get that he's supposed to be a slacker loser and that he would be shocked and pissed, etc.. but give me a break. his character was so ugly and unappealing--physically and emotionally. any woman would have gotten up and walked out from that first moment she told him, then he continues to be a slacker loser, still calling her names, i dont think so. the screenplay was soooo obviously written by a man cuz no woman would make a guy that vile and have her get together with him ever again.

Posted at 7:14PM on Jun 6th 2007 by kim

23. Eckler isn't the first woman to become "knocked up" - nor coin the term - and she became knocked up from her fiance where has Heigl became knocked up from a one-night stand stoner guy that she tries to "get to know" through out the movie.

How she thinks she's being ripped off is beyond me.

Posted at 7:24PM on Jun 6th 2007 by EricaMarie

24. Mike B.: TOTALLY agree with you - RE's columns are AWFUL and I despise her writing, her viewpoint, everything...at least, the last time I tried to read one, which was a while ago. It was the same everytime: I get a few sentences in and then all I can say is "F**K off" and go on to something else. She's one of the reasons I don't buy the NP so much anymore. She hasn't changed, I see, in the years she's been there. it's embarrassing as a women, as a Canadian, and geez, a human being...I cannot believe the NP would keep her on...but then I think, well, Toronto...and maybe it's not so surprising. I suppose the only good thing about this is that we are now at least vastly amused. It's laughable, it truely is. "But I was a young and upcoming reporter!" Who describes themselves like that? Oh, I laugh and laugh at this.

Posted at 12:04AM on Jun 7th 2007 by Diane

25. ...meant "...young, up and coming reporter ... " Still, who describes themselves that way...oh God, I can't stand this woman.

Posted at 2:14PM on Jun 7th 2007 by Diane

26. ruined, i totally agree with you. the premise was cute, but the character and his friends were so over-the-top gross and offensive it wasnt even believable that a beautiful, successful woman would even CALL this crude slob, LET ALONE give him a chance and MARRY him! his few cute deeds were way too little waaaaayyyyyy too late!

i was shocked by all the F-bombs too. normally i dont even notice them in movies, and i have been known to use the word myself, but i could not believe how many times all of the characters said the various forms of the eff word. and often it was used in such mean and hurtful ways.

the writers ruined this movie. if they had made the same unattractive guy with a job and a good personality, the story would still have worked. i enjoy a story with a bad guy, but this was NOT the story to do it. they were pushing it enough that she would even have made out with such a loser, let alone all the rest! dream on, dorky guys!

it's a loser guy's fantasy---and i do mean fantasy cuz that would NOT have happened in real life!

Posted at 2:02PM on Jun 7th 2007 by kim

27. You REALLY think this could not happen in real life? (The successful girl and loser guy, I mean). To say that a female wouldn't stay with a guy like that is a little short. When a girl is pregnant, you'd be surprised who she'll stay with to make sure the baby has a father in it's life. I can't say I've ever been in this kind of situation (thank god), but I know of people I went to high school with who had children too young and stayed with the guy even though they REALLY shouldn't have.

Posted at 2:39PM on Jun 7th 2007 by Robyn

28. It's safe to read the National Post again, people. RE has moved to Maclean's magazine. Same self-absorption and superficiality. It is like reading a high school girl's diary.

Posted at 3:05PM on Jun 8th 2007 by Denise

Previous 15 Comments