Paris' Next Hot Haunt -- The Lynwood Lounge

76. this looks like a big cafateria, maybe they will let her daddy hire a band and throw her a coming out partyon 6-25.they can have lindsay, britney and nichole and one big hoe down

Posted at 4:40AM on Jun 16th 2007 by christine

77. People, please understand that Paris violated the law 4 times!!!! Her license was suspended back in 2006 (#1). and she was stopped for an illegal u-turn with said suspended license and given a warning and a second fix-it ticket (already highly unusual) (#2), then she got the first DUI (#3), she was put on probation for that and her license suspended. Then she was stopped for driving with a suspended license and while on probation (#4). So her punishment is just. If it was just the DUI then yes, most people get less than 45 days. But 4 violations... she deserves more. Plus the fact that she didn't bother to come to court, and when she was ordered to she came late... She has demonstrated that she has no respect for the law and she's paying the price.
Trust me, I've got judges, lawyers and cops in my family here in LA... if it were a regular person she'd probably have 60 days to serve, not just 45. And it is HIGHLY UNUSUAL for a Sheriff to determine if an inmate should get house arrest... that's for a JUDGE to decide AFTER hearing from the Drs, the DA, and the sheriff. A sheriff can make a recommendation, but not release an inmate. The judge has every right to be pissed.

Posted at 9:23PM on Jun 15th 2007 by ridgerunner

78. Honestly again cry me a river play me a harp....WTF his her problem.
Big deal

Posted at 9:38PM on Jun 15th 2007 by Me

79. #80 How sad a 79 year old lady has to go to jail, I bet she didnt get special treatment, how come she cant go home cause shes old real old ,Parasite Hilter Hiton is nothing but a spoiled rich racists bitch. go to idontlikeyouinthatway.com

Posted at 1:05PM on Jun 17th 2007 by jackdaniels

80. Thats hot...nice colors

Posted at 9:30AM on Jun 16th 2007 by Melody

81. Fabulous digs!! almost as posh as Chateau Marmont......

Posted at 1:09AM on Jun 16th 2007 by Firecrotch

82. Paris is a spoiled turd who deserves to be in the general population. The only problem is if she get gang raped she'll like it.

Posted at 1:57AM on Jun 16th 2007 by qwkinuf

83. It kind of looks like it was decorated by Jonathan Adler

Posted at 4:32AM on Jun 16th 2007 by not shocked

84. That's way to good for parisite, just keep her locked up in her puny little cell coz I wanna see her have a complete meltdown NOW THAT WOULD BE HOT!

Posted at 7:37PM on Jun 19th 2007 by PARISITE JAIL CROTCH HILTON SUX!

85. two questions
#1 When the sheriff explains why he went agaisnt the judges orders,will he also have to explain why it cost so much extra for her vs a regular person?I think daddy should have to pay the taxpayers back for his darling daughter stay.

#2If Paris does plan on having a movie made about her time in jail,Who is going to play her?It is a fact she can't act.That is why she did the home prono movie,she couldn't learn the lines to be in a real one.

Posted at 10:18AM on Jun 16th 2007 by angel

86.
Yal, and have you ever visited and heard them yell like animals out those tiny small windows.

Posted at 5:57PM on Jun 18th 2007 by maryanita

87. PUT ALL THE BAD GIRLS IN THERE {PARIS, LINDSY, NICOLE ,BRITTNY} HAVE THEM LEARN SOMETHING.{NOT TO DRIVE AND DRINK}.............................THEY ARE TRYING TO OUT DO ONE ANOTHER ,TO SEE WHICH ONE CAN OUT DO THE OTHER. FOR ATTENTION ,ATTENTION ATTENTION......................................................................................

Posted at 7:29PM on Jun 16th 2007 by TYLER W.

88. FACT: Hilton violated the terms of her probation – not once, but twice.

FACT: As part of her original probation, the judge had originally ordered Hilton to take 12 hours of an alcohol educational course. As of the end of April 2007, Hilton hadn’t even applied for it and February 2007 was the deadline.

FACT: Hilton was offered community service in exchange for a lesser sentence; she didn’t do it.

FACT: Hilton also claimed that she had not received notice of her suspension, which the police officers found in the glove compartment of her car. When the highway patrol stopped her the first time, they gave her a firm warning about her suspended driving privileges and required her to sign a statement acknowledging that she was not allowed to drive, which was placed in her glove compartment.

FACT: The second time Hilton was stopped in violation of her probation, she was speeding with her car lights off.

FACT: In court following her second offense of violating her probation, Hilton tried to play “the blame game,” and blamed everything on her publicist and supposedly “fired” this man whom she had convinced to take the heat for her. When the judge didn’t buy this lame story, she “hired him back.”

FACT: Hilton has claimed in interviews that she is a very shrewd businesswoman who reads her contract deals very carefully. But in court, she asserted that she doesn’t read the tickets that she signs?

It’s no wonder the judge gave this arrogant narcissist – who is all about image and ego -- the 45 days; he knew that with time reduced for good behavior, the actual time served would be a few weeks at most. It was a very fair sentence.

Posted at 10:29PM on Jun 16th 2007 by Genn

89. the spoiled brat is a terrible example and needs to in jail.its a waste of network space to even talk about her drinking/drugs and trashy appearence.WHY ARE WE NOT USING THE NETWORK FOR OUR TROOPS IN WAR/THE HOMELESS AND HUNGRY/OUR CHILDREN IN GENERAL/GOD FORBID ANYONE SHOULD FOLLOW THIS TRAMPS LACK OF MORALS.

Posted at 2:50PM on Jun 17th 2007 by whocares

90. Response to posting: 61, by Genn, 17 June 2007, and 483, by “only anonymous…”. 17 June, 2007.

Thank you both for your response to my posts.

Firstly, I should like to thank you Genn for bringing to my attention your concerns regarding my comments seemingly ‘playing down what is going on in your country’. My comments were founded upon the assorted arguments posted upon TMZ.com, and reports on the electronic news media. My comments regarding the “judgemental stance” were, as I said, referring to the “cowards, who behind anonymity, take the moral high ground”, and unlike the fourth question viz., “… is the public outrage based upon the socio-economic status of the Hilton family?”, was ( only a question not to be considered as a comment expressing my opinion ) not implying that others, apart from those specified, held the same view. I have also heard that Paris Hilton “presents herself as a ‘role model’”, which, I agree, does raise a valid and worrying issue in respect to many young people emulating her, as well as other celebrities’ fashions and events. However, this issue is quite unrelated to the subject matter in question ss., the public vilification of Paris Hilton and her family.

One can try to understand the great loss your family suffered in losing a 16-year old young lady, through the carelessness of a motorist. The experience of being subjected to the pain, loss, and grief can only be realized by those directly effected. I would hope that I wont be perceived as depreciating the suffering, and grave loss, your family ( et alii ) endure, but a personal tragedy unassociated with another situation – as in the Paris Hilton case – can’t be used to support your argument suggesting that “…she did not accept blame for her actions and appeared to attempt to manipulate the legal system”. In the Hilton case there was, fortunately, no victim. One would hope that Paris Hilton has really “…accept(ed) blame for her actions”. And also hope that the arguments between the defence, prosecution, and the concluding decision ( of law ) were ( as one would expect of the American judicial laws of procedures and practices ) not a ‘manipulation of the legal system by Hilton’. In conclusion, thank you Genn for your polite response.

Secondly, Thank you “only anonymous” for your response to my posting. However, your sarcastic comments regarding my ecclesiastic title, arrogant assumptions, and sardonic remark regarding my website, deserve no response except to acknowledge that it is beyond daft.

All my postings on the internet regarding Paris Hilton were not in reference to her offences, matters at court, sentence and incarceration, but the harsh public vilification of Paris and her family.

Posted at 7:01PM on Jun 19th 2007 by Rev. Father Maximiadis