Jolie Flustered by FOX Flurry

46. Look at the nonsense Americans worry about. You are spoon fed this crap to keep your eyes off of the real problems that risk your liberty.
Namely, AIPAC's wholesale purchase of the Democrats (including Pelosi), and their brethren behind the scenes of ALL of this garbage that you consider newsworthy.
Our country is now fully under the control of a foreign nation and it's being done with such finesse that not one in 10 of you chumps can name it.

Posted at 8:56PM on Jun 18th 2007 by dave

47. Hey She is just a looney liberal.this is what liberals do.They hate any other point of view but theirs.And they claim to be tolerant.Libs just hate the fact that they cant get a monopoly on the media.They have cbs,abc,nbc,cnn,msnbc,cnbc.Its sad with all the media outlets they have americans still wont believe anything libs say or do.With good reason they are hippocrits and liars

Posted at 9:09PM on Jun 18th 2007 by don

48. # 50 ............................we caused the 9/11 , terrorist scam,,,,so we could invent the Patriot Act, kill Sadam, & set up shop in Iraq near Saudi,,,, Iran u next ,,,,suca

Posted at 9:12PM on Jun 18th 2007 by costaMesaboy

49. About time someone told Fox to stick it. At least she was straight up and honest about it.

Posted at 9:16PM on Jun 18th 2007 by Rugger

50. I don't think we have anything to worry about when it comes to her "blockbuster" movie due out next week. The critics have already panned it........her phony accent is pathetic. I think her acting career is finished.

Posted at 9:39PM on Jun 18th 2007 by Chukkal

51. 'An article on the subject appearing on FoxNews.com sarcastically quips, “Reporters Without Borders, indeed,” as if Reporters Without Borders’ sole concern is whether or not the press can ask personal questions of celebrities. It is insulting to Daniel Pearl that the press would invoke his name and the circumstances of his tragic death in conjunction with something so inconsequential, and arrogant of Fox News to align their situation with his, especially considering that they were able to attend after all.'

'According to the contract put forth by Jolie’s lawyers, questions directed at the actress should be about the movie, and really, they should be anyway. Perhaps Jolie and her “people” just wanted to make sure that the premiere was handled in the media with the same seriousness with which the film itself handles real issues regarding journalism and personal loss.'

Well said. FOX is one of the most pathetic excuses for so-called journalism. They're not interested in "Fair and Balanced" news; they don't even known what that means. If I were in Jolie's position, I'd ban their a*sses as well. Freedom of speech is important in our country and so is freedom of choices. So they didn't get an initial invite.....tsk, tsk, that is so unfair. But I'll gladly make it up to them and invite them to my own personal premiere....of the FOX News roast dinner. Jolie's mistake was being polite to them when they wanted to know why they were banned. She should have told them the truth, that they are hypocritical *sswipes.

And they got their panties all in a wad because she had her lawyers set-up a contract on what could be asked...namely no personal questions and that it should be directed at the movie...at it's premiere. Well that's ridiculous. Not only does Jolie have a right to use a contract for interviews, it is certainly not uncommon for celebrities to do so - including before agreeing to attend a talk show interview where the focus is mainly on that person, not nec. even a movie. If the interviewer doesn't like it (the contract) ahead of time, he/she doesn't have to do the interview. No one is holding a gun to their head....or as in Pearl's case, cutting off their heads.

Thanks Mary for the article.

Posted at 9:36PM on Jun 18th 2007 by SinCity

52. Yea Yea Yea. She got caught in her hypocrisy and now she's apologizing. Like this really means anything. She's still the same liberal, biased, intolerant person she was before.

Posted at 9:40PM on Jun 18th 2007 by Married Mom

53. Who is Jolie, anyway? Should we really care about what she and Brad believe about anything? I don't. If everybody would get a life, they would go away. I called the Rosie O. meltdown and flight from "the View'. I'm correct on this one, also. Trust me. Ignore them and they will disappear.

Posted at 9:45PM on Jun 18th 2007 by donald duck

54. hello? she didnt look flustered at all? Am i missing something here?

Posted at 7:01AM on Jun 19th 2007 by tammy

55. As a registered democrat I'm insulted every time I hear people trashing Fox news. Fox have the right to showcase their point of view. We don't live in Hitler's Germany, Cuba or Venezuela were the press only must show one point of view. That fascism!.
We need Fox like we need CNN, MSNBC, et, etc...It's call DEMOCRACY.- FREE PRESS.
Angelina Jolie made a big mistake and I think she already apologize for it. Is she sincere? Of course not, but what can you do? Kill the woman?

If she is as ignorant as I think she is, her true colors will show.- You can count on it!

Posted at 10:34PM on Jun 18th 2007 by coco

56. To Morgan: - You don;t need a lot of credentials to be a UN Ambassador. Just a simple invitation. Shakira and a bunch of other celebrities are also embassadors. Don't forget that UN is now a corrupt organization that it's being investigated...So Angelina it's not really in a good company. ..I grant her....The woman it's better than Madonna inventing herself...In fact, she hates Madonna and trashed her, when Madonna adopted. I guess Miss Hollywood's mother Theresa wants to be the only one...Oh well...

Posted at 10:34PM on Jun 18th 2007 by coco

57. Anyone who snubs FOX is commiting sucide, look at their ratings and they are only getting stronger. The American public speaks, the silent majority who is never polled. Poor poor liberals, they never will get it. Jollie is just this weeks flavor, ten years from today, people will say, who?

Posted at 6:10PM on Jun 19th 2007 by John R Garland

58. Costa Mesa Boy -
I know you really don't belive the crap you say...you're just acting like an insane person to get a response....I mean, I can't imagine any sane person would spout the crap you do.

Posted at 10:47PM on Jun 18th 2007 by KT

59. It's funny how people who watch Fox News will swear up and down that it is balanced. I remember when I first watched it, I was nearly knocked over by the obvious right-wing agenda. Right wing authoritarianism doesn't know how to be "fair and balanced."

Fox News attacks celebrities all of the time because they are mostly presumed to be "liberal" (i.e., they seem to disagree with Fox News). In the clip, the reporter barked/asked why she banned Fox News and it sounded like a rhetorical question. It's pretty disturbing that "intelligent" people truly believe that Fox News is "fair and balanced." Where were the critics of the "liberal" media when the press allowed the president to be thrown softballs, were complicit in the lies regarding WMDs, agreed not to show the daily horror (not necessarily Abu Graib [sp?]) of the ware, etc.

Yes, they have a right to give their views. My problem with them is that they are ethically challenged enough to claim "fair and balanced" when a lobotomy patient can clearly see that they are a glaring tool of the right.

Posted at 10:47PM on Jun 18th 2007 by Really, get over it

60. angie, ur way overrated. why does everybody think she's still hot! she's old news jessica alba is whats in now

Posted at 8:10AM on Jun 19th 2007 by daniel estrada