Crotch-Block It Like Beckham

46. I actually think that's really sweet! Although it looks like softcore porn.

Posted at 3:42PM on Jul 18th 2007 by es

47. you sorry ass phodogs have no shame!

Posted at 3:41PM on Jul 18th 2007 by jeff

48. No one really wants to see E.T's prick!

Posted at 3:43PM on Jul 18th 2007 by val

49. Let's see, Victoria spreads her legs in a photo shoot and shows the world her big ugly cotton panties with the extra heavy crotch that looked like there is a pad sticking out the side, NOW she's all modest? She's not only a homely anorexic ugly-boobed no-talent skank, she is a hypocrite too. Go back to England, Beckhams, David has "injuries" and won't even be earning that mountain of money, and Victoria is the Queen of Vapid. No wonder England is so happy to see them go.

Posted at 3:45PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Luke

50. He's such a gentleman!! What an awesome husband!! He's gorgeous, too, and that's not bad.

Posted at 4:15PM on Jul 18th 2007 by melissa

51. CLASSY COUPLE. VICTORIA SAYS SHE WOULD NOT LEAVE THE HOUSE WITHOUT HER KNICKERS. I LIKE THIS COUPLE. SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST SO JEALOUS!!!!

Posted at 3:57PM on Jul 18th 2007 by QUINCYGIRL

52. Who said she doesn't have panties on? you guys just assume - her husband was being so kind to help her cover herself getting out of the vehicle - I'm sure he doesn't want anyone seeing her privates panties on or off.....so get over it already.

Posted at 4:35PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Kelly

53. There is an easy way to enter and leave a car without showing between your legs, and you can do so without the use of your purse or your boyfriend's hand as a cover. As one old enough to have worn micro minis, I can attest to the successfulness of the simple procedure.

Posted at 3:22AM on Jul 19th 2007 by Mary

54. Why would any women be jealous of Victoria, LOL. She has a bad boob job and can't smile and has to be covered up all the time, even in photos in which she is parading around in (ugly-a$$) underwear. As for David being a gentleman, why would he mind anything showing this time when they BOTH allowed themselves to be photographed in dumb looking underwear. Victoria did spread her legs wide, as another poster commented, and her crotch was fully exposed. David had his silly-looking briefs pulled up his a$$ but NOW he is going to be oh so careful the paps don't get even a teensy glimpse of what they have gladly already shown in their now infamous underwear photos? ANYTHING the paps could have got here would have been a fraction of what these two twits showed when they were photographed in their underwear. And who would even want to see Victoria's underwear, it is pretty gross anyway. This is just a hoot, they are trying to look like they are just too classy to even allow an accidental miniscule peek, but they do a bunch of photos ONLY in their underwear. Idiots.

Posted at 4:08PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Josh

55. TMZ you pay people to run around to take crotch shots, or are they your personal "jack off" photos for later?

Posted at 4:10PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Avamp1

56. Good Job David, you protect your wife. Ha ha ha TMZ thought they were going to humiliate another entertainer.

Posted at 5:05PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Joy

57. Is the whole pantyless shot a phenomenon of the current decade? You'd never catch the ladies of the '80s pulling that stunt. More on the ladies of the 80s at blogs.tampabay.com/80s

Posted at 4:44PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Stuck in the 80s

58. Craig

The word you used for the media is totaly ment for YOU

Posted at 4:43PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Ronald

59. God, he's so hot...and considerate.

Now, let's hope the paps don't chase him and family back to Euroland.

Posted at 4:53PM on Jul 18th 2007 by Yum

60. Why can't a woman get out of a car without someone trying to get a picture of her crotch?!! The paparazzi are total pigs. I'm glad she was able to keep hers blocked, using that bag and her husband's hand. That's pretty nasty of the photographers. What a classless group of people.

Posted at 5:08PM on Jul 18th 2007 by me