No Faith? Hill's Body and Face Replaced!

46. Well, sadly, her body has to match the 'Skinny Pills' article they are hawking.

Pathetic.

Posted at 2:51PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Simone

47. TMZ this was last month's cover. I just got my redbook yesterday and Kelly RIpa is on the cover

Posted at 2:35PM on Jul 20th 2007 by me

48. I've met her several times, close up, and even the unedited photo does her justice. She looks very, very old, used and tired in real life.

Posted at 2:48PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Steffie

49. I challenge any magazine to put an actual picture of any celebrity over 35 on their magazine unretouched (no inches lost, not hollows filled in, no hair lightened, no arms made skinnier). I will be a subscriber for life. Faith Hill looks awesome for her age and magazines need to stop thinking that America wants to see pictures that we no are unnatural and altered. We can look at Playboy for that. Keep it real Redbook.

Posted at 3:01PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Allison

50. Yeah and what about her entire face being air-brushed??? She looks great in her original form. Screw mags anyway. Love your website!!!!

Posted at 2:55PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Ro

51. No wonder so many girls have eating disorders. Look how skinny they make her arms look!! I think the original pic is much better!!

Posted at 3:05PM on Jul 20th 2007 by SUN GODDESS

52. it's a sad day in the US when magazines think someone who looks as awesome as Faith in her original photo needs polishing to that extent. She looks amazing for 40 or 30 and that was needless. She should be more than a little irritated at the magazine.

Posted at 3:15PM on Jul 20th 2007 by faithless

53. Who wants to see a 40 year old woman on the cover of a magazine? Gross... I'm glad they touched it up!

Posted at 3:25PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Fatty

54. DID THEY DO THIS WITH HER PERMISSION? IF SO, SHE IS SENDING HER THREE DAUGHTERS SOME REALLY BAD MESSAGES.

Posted at 3:55PM on Jul 20th 2007 by annab

55. No wonder people feel bad about themselves! When the "media" feel like they need to airbrush someone as lovely as this, what chance do the rest of us have. It's just sad.

Posted at 4:44PM on Jul 20th 2007 by smokeytx

56. Plus they removed the collar bone in the magazine shot. Good eyes DANI, about the arm. I think her other arm looks really weird photoshopped. It's so skinny it looks like Nicole's. And yea that's hollywood... totally fake.

Posted at 4:31PM on Jul 20th 2007 by scary

57. She looks gorgeous in the original! This industry is so stupid.

Posted at 5:00PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Heather

58. she is a beautiful woman w/o the photoshop !!!!!!! it is a shame that the magazines and media in general wants to glamorize a certain look of being really really thin and perfect. Faith is not perfect but she is beautiful! this makes me mad because on last weeks Star they had the celebrities weight. they spoke of Kelly Clarkson being overweight at about 140 pounds and said she should seek help for overeating while they congratulated Jessica Simpson for loosing weight. what are these magazine teaching young girls?

Posted at 5:05PM on Jul 20th 2007 by eureKa

59. That's really unfair to the public. We are supposed to believe that celebrities are "perfect" when they are, in fact, just like us. I consider myself attractive; but I never like pictures of myself.

Now it's perfectly alright to fix what you don't like! So I will tweak my own photo's. LOL One day my kids will be looking at photo's and ask, "Who is this?" And I won't even know!!

Posted at 5:10PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Rocky

60. Hey TMZ...what's with all of the figure/beauty coverage flaws lately. First, there was Paris Hilton is that scarey looking bathing suit (ugh), and now you're picking on someone like Faith Hill who truly is beautiful. We notice you didn't say anything about the photoshop work done on Hiltons "legs" photo.

Hmmm...

Posted at 5:17PM on Jul 20th 2007 by Wes