Designer Im-Posh-ter

Just when you thought Victoria Beckham couldn't get any faker -- along comes something called Chanelle!
Posh Spice and Chanelle
Believe it or not, British "Big Brother" fauxality show bimbo Chanelle Hayes arrived to a London event on Thursday dressed like a trashier, cheaper, chavier version of Posh. She's so "may-jah!"

The 19-year-old Poshtitute wannabe mimicked the little black mess Victoria wore to an award show in June. Imitation of Spice!



Filed under: Wacky & Weird, Becks & Posh

Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 7)Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. what's with all these stupid celeb impostors lately?? Posh is HOT, the impostor is NOT!

Posted at 7:39PM on Aug 10th 2007 by anonymous

62. She really should try to develop her own identity. I don't understand anyone that's wiling to be a sheep.

Chanelle certainly is NOT fat. I am not a fan of either of those females but I bet any of you cheeky buggers with your nasty insults would look the same o worse when stuck next to a picture of the extremely unnaturally thin VB.

Posted at 7:57PM on Aug 10th 2007 by Kadri

63. I would POP THAT BOOTY posh if I ever had the chance.

Posted at 8:16PM on Aug 10th 2007 by lightfoot

64. the difference is posh looks rich, her clothes look rich, and the other girl looks just normal, maybe average, same idea, but the clothes are entirely different in terms of fit and quality. That's why post looks so much better. And of course being slim always helps. People are so jealous of her and her husband. Well her husband likes clothes way too much for a man in my opinion. Beckham is like obsessed with clothes, what's with that? I prefer the springsteen type myself.

Posted at 8:54PM on Aug 10th 2007 by vivian

65. Posh is much more fit and toned. I don't know who the other woman is, but she definitely did not achieve the look she was going for.

Posted at 8:59PM on Aug 10th 2007 by Maddie

66. OK, Posh looks like caviar, the other one looks like dollar beer.

Posted at 9:17PM on Aug 10th 2007 by Barbie

67. DAMN 19............take your time baby, you look like a mommy also,,,BOTH ARE HOTTIES

Posted at 9:31PM on Aug 10th 2007 by costaMesaboy

68. Do I see Posh's crotch? Is that a dress? If it is, that is her crotch with lace panties. If she would smile sometimes.....show some personality.

Posted at 10:29PM on Aug 10th 2007 by Nan

69. Chavtastic, baby!

Posted at 10:34PM on Aug 10th 2007 by jri

70. THEY ARE BOTH CHEAP LOOKING FLOOSIES. MONEY CAN'T BUY CLASS OR ANY
RESPECT, THAT HAIRCUT IS UGLY ON THEM BOTH, LOOKS LIKE THEY HAD A FIGHT
WITH A LAWN MOWER AND OBVIOUSLY THE LAWN MOWER WON, HANDS DOWN.
I HOPE KATIE HOLMES AND TOM CRUISE DON'T HANG OUT WITH THE BECKHAM'S
ANY MORE. KATIE IS TOO BEAUTIFUL AND SOPHISTICATED AND POLISHED AND
HAS CLASS.
I BET DAVID BECKHAM HAS WET DREAMS ABOUT KATIE. SHE IS SO GORGEOUS.
AND HERE THE POOR GUY IS MARRIED TO POSH, WHO LOOKS LIKE SHE WILL
CRACK HER FACE IF SHE SMILES.

Posted at 1:02AM on Aug 11th 2007 by Elisabeth Hasselbitch SUCKS!

71. ""She's not fat and she looks sexy, men like meat on their women. She is just trying to hard"" - pretty much NOT EVEN CLOSE. Posh is HOT and NORMAL, this chick that it impersonating her is not cute or even close to looking like her, she is just dressed alike, soooo what. You are FAT AND UGLY... NO comparison at all, sorry hun.

Posted at 1:09AM on Aug 11th 2007 by chanellee

72. shutup - kadintodd2@aol.com

Posted at 1:11AM on Aug 11th 2007 by chanellee

73. Skanky pig-nosed Victoria only LOOKS toned because she is wearing SUPPORT HOSE, lol. She doesn't look rich, she looks like she always does, trashy and cheap. I crack up when I remember David making a big deal out of "protecting" Victoria from paprazzi who might get a little peek of her crotch as she was getting out of a car. Now mind you, Victoria and David had already done that MOSY tacky photo shoot appearing in nothing BUT their underwear! David had his briefs pulled into his butt (and looked like a gay porn model) and Victoria was in THE ugliest, most bizarre cotton underwear, and even spread her legs WAY wide so her crotch was the focal point of the photo! THEN the oh-so-modest display of the two of them being so careful to protect Victoria's crotch from just a peek after totally hanging it out in a photo shoot for W. I mean, these two dimwits are hysterical, now AGAIN, here is Victoria in a dress so short, her panties are hanging out the bottom but......the pantis that are showing must have been pulled over those SUPPORT HOSE! What a cheap pice of trash.

PRETTY MUCH YOU WHO POSTED THIS IS JEALOUS AND A STUPID PIECE OF NASTY TRASH... YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY JEALOUS.

Posted at 1:12AM on Aug 11th 2007 by chanellee

74. UTOPIAN @ # 73 YOU ROCK! iF DAVID IS WORRIED ABOUT LET THE WORLD SEE
HIS WIFE'S TUNA CROTCH, THAN WHY IS HE LETTING HER WEAR SHORT DRESSES
I AM SURE AS A HUSBAND HE COULD ASK HER TO STOP DRESSING LIKE A
PROSTITUTE.
BESIDES THE WORLD HAS BEEN EXPOSED TO BRITTANY'S, PARIS'S AND LINDSAY'S
CROTCHES AND WHY WOULD THIS STINKY BITCH'S MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE, WE
ARE NOT INTERESTED IN IT ANYWAY. THEY ARE REALLY FAKERS AND SHOULD GO
BACK OR DON'T LEAVE HOME!

Posted at 1:50AM on Aug 11th 2007 by Elisabeth Hasselbitch SUCKS!

75. Victoria is a wonderful beautiful person. She looks amazing in this choice of outift. Vicky B. has the body and guts to pull something off like this the other girl?...not so much. And Victoria is class full on because she is wearing stockings unlike the other one.

Posted at 2:39AM on Aug 11th 2007 by Posh 2.0

Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips