31. People who feel that these celebrities should be stalked and harassed while out with A NEWBORN INFANT need to get their heads examined. I dont care what profession they chose, why should their children be out in harms way because paparazzi want money??? Do we make doctors diagnose us while they are out to dinner with their kids? Do we harass our hairdressers to give us a quick cut while theyre taking their kids to school? Why should actors not be allowed to have a private life when they are NOT on a movie screen? Because some greedy people say so?

Posted at 4:09PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Cindy

32. Good for Liev! The public eye is one thing, being stalked by the paparazzi (which is out of control now) is another.

Posted at 4:12PM on Aug 20th 2007 by DP

33. Soooooooo YOU SILLY STARS want to live in the public eye and be paid by the rest of us for your public outings........then grow up and expect that you will be tailed by paps. Period.

Besides if you don't act nutty.....the paps won't even bother with you. You make yourselves in to tabloid fodder with all the crazy behaviors.

Posted at 4:14PM on Aug 20th 2007 by K.L.

34. Don't like the paps get out of the business. Pretty simple solution.

Posted at 4:19PM on Aug 20th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

35. So let me get this straight. For all those who are saying these people deserve what they get because they are out in public with their kids, etc. If some strange person with a camera started snapping pics of YOUR children, you would probably call the cops and say theres a pedophile stalking your child, BUT these actors should be peachy keen with strangers snapping THEIR children BECAUSE they are actors? Hmmm.

Posted at 4:20PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Jennifer

36. The paps aren't following Liev but Naomi. He's not a big enough star.

Posted at 4:24PM on Aug 20th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

37. Jennifer,

No I wouldn't like it but I'm not living in Hollywood flaunting my fame, money, etc. If I were to become a Hollywood star then I'd have to accept it's part of life there now. Stars want to dictate when the paps take their pictures. That's BS! It's okay when they flaunt their outfits on Academy Awards night but not any other. There can't be a "take a picture of me here but not there" approach.

Posted at 4:29PM on Aug 20th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

38. K.L. Do you really believe that if these stars are calm, the paps will go away? Really?

Posted at 4:30PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Jennifer

39. Yes, actually, there SHOULD be a "you cant take my picture while I am carrying a newborn infant, or child" policy with stars. Paparazzi should NOT be allowed to stalk stars out with their children, plain and simple. I'm sorry, but I completely believe that these childrens safety HAS to come before the money these paps can make off of a picture.

Posted at 4:33PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Jennifer

40. Paps are making a living like it or not. Stars should stay home if they don't like it.

Posted at 4:37PM on Aug 20th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

41. Liev was a dad protecting his baby, funny how we didn't see the first of that video. Though i do enjoy my TMZ i must say that the so called photogs get too close at times and are way to aggressive. Sure, that may be the price of fame but there needs to be rules. 20 flashing camera bulbs going off in a newborn's face, come on now! He didn't push the guy any harder than what they get pushed trying to go in and out of a restaurant!

Posted at 4:42PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Amy in KY

42. Well, good then. I hope when the paps knock a child down and injure it, or someone is killed or someones child is killed as a direct result of the ridiculous stalking and crowding methods these photogs use, that those photogs feel good about their profession. To me, if they are acting like animals, they are no better than animals, and they should go live in the zoo or the wild, and leave civilized people alone. Put the paps in the zoo in a cage and let people regardless of their profession take their children out in peace.

Posted at 4:43PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Jennifer

43. These photog people are vultures. This is their job? To surround and provoke people when their out on the town? There should be new privacy laws passed, that these people can't make a living out this type of BS. If they want pics, they set up a time/place with the person, and they pay the person for their time. Frickin Jamokes.

Posted at 4:44PM on Aug 20th 2007 by ECote

44. Good for him. Go Liev! Paparazzi from TMZ and the like have gotten out of control, and it's just become absurd.

Kick their asses!

Posted at 4:45PM on Aug 20th 2007 by Jason W

45. These guys crossed the line. Liev and Naomi had a new born child with them - the paparazzi should back off.

Posted at 4:45PM on Aug 20th 2007 by R