Ex-Hoff to Judge: I'm Movin'

The bitter divorce battle between David Hasselhoff and Pamela Bach had another surprise twist today. TMZ has learned that Pam has decided to move out of the family residence in Encino, Calif. -- just to get the former couple's financial trial delayed beyond October 1.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mark Juhas told Bach on Monday that he would agree to postpone the trial if she vacated the property so David can move back in with their two teenage daughters, Taylor, 17, and Hayley, 15. The ex-Hoff has until October 1 to pack and go.

Hasselhoff has sole legal and primary custody of the girls. The trial -- which will divide the former couple's assets -- is now scheduled for January 28 of next year. Stay tuned!

Related

Links



Filed under: Dirty Divorces, David Hasselhoff


Tags: battle, custody, David Hasselhoff, DavidHasselhoff, divorce, money, Pamela Bach, PamelaBach

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. hmm - Does Pam pay child support? I bet she doesn't because she's a WOMAN! So unfair.

Posted at 8:39PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Seeking Justice

2. I'm still wondering why David got custody. Considering that drunken video that was released with his daughter begging him to quit drinking.

Posted at 8:50PM on Sep 12th 2007 by CelebFan

3. The Hasselhoff video is one of the best of all time. We all WISH we could have been him in that vid!!!

Posted at 8:53PM on Sep 12th 2007 by skateboardbaby

4.
#1 by Seeking Justice
Brittney Spears pays child support and many other women as well.
What kind of Justice are you seeking? bitter justice or knowledgeable fact based justice.
Many things are taken into account when ordering a person to pay child support. None of which would be their gender.

Posted at 8:55PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Trac

5.
re # 2
David got custody because he said yes to a drug and alcohol testing procedure and the Mother said no
plus the daughter do have a say in who they wish to be with at their ages.
the video of a drunken David was taken by his daughter but never meant for release to the media as it was. Hum how did that happen and did it show the judge something that determined his decision.

Posted at 9:01PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Best of the Bad

6.
I lay money down she trashes or sabotages that house in some way not caring one bit how it may effect her daughters.

Posted at 9:06PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Jay

7. This woman is a loser and she was the ones who leaked that infamous drunk Hoff to the
press. Of course she will not admit it just like the recording of Alec Baldwin ranting at his
daughter was leaked by Kim Basinger and of course she will not admit it either.
Bach is a moron and inconsiderate, she hit someone's car and took off and than she tried to strong arm the victim into signing a release or something. She is a drama bitch.

Posted at 9:53PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Go with the Flow

8. Guess she won't be hittin up Opri for a bed in the guest room.

Posted at 9:58PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Just sayin

9. In Hollywood it doesn't really matter who gets custody of the children. In the end the children will wind up screwed up, spoiled and dumb like most of the Hollywood kids today no matter which parent raises them.

Posted at 9:59PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Hollywood Parents Are Pimps!

10. #9 'Guess she won't be hittin up Opri for a bed in the guest room.'

Haha! Imagine the bill for that!

Posted at 10:01PM on Sep 12th 2007 by no pammy, no!

11. What goes around comes around. Karma's such a bitch.

Posted at 10:02PM on Sep 12th 2007 by me

12. "BREAKING NEWS, TV HAS-BEEN'S UNKNOWN WIFE MOVING OUT" Jesus you make it seem like anyone gives a rat's ass about this. Why didn't you slap the ubiquitous "EXCLUSIVE" tag on the photo too?

TMZ = making news out of nothing since day 1

Posted at 10:13PM on Sep 12th 2007 by rusty shackleford

13. well i think she is getting a royal screw job shame on him i use to like him but now i think he is a loser

Posted at 10:15PM on Sep 12th 2007 by linda

14. Makes you want to not have kids as men have discovered that kids are the real weapons to use against their wives in a divorce. For most men its about the money but if they want to put a stake in the heart of their ex-wives, they go after the kids.

I know, all the men are going to say horrible things about me and my post but I sincerely believe its true.

And yes, I've taken my own observation to heart, no kids for me. If we divorce, then I don't have to worry about losing the kids. Since he's the earner in the family, he'd just have to pay me.

Posted at 10:26PM on Sep 12th 2007 by Lucille

15. don't matter how much $$$ you have...how nice the house or car is...doin lines just makes you crazy and this skank is the prime exhibit

Posted at 11:08PM on Sep 12th 2007 by sosickntwisted

| 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments