O.J.'s Alleged Robbery - Audio




Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 7) Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. First of all, let me tell all of you who are reading this. I wish for all of you to get on with your lives. Everyone in this case has a hunger for money. Including O.J. I feel he loves the Lime light, and loves the Media attention. He has that Love him Hate him thing going for himeself and this is why everyone like myself is taking time out of their lives to comment or watch this Man. STOP IT! If we stop giving him the time of day, then he'll go away. We'll never know if he really killed Ron & Nicole, and we'll never be his eternal Judge. I personally hope they do put him away, because then the media will find someone else to go after. No more O.J no more Golman's. By the way, where's the Brown's??? Everyone keep saying what he owes the Goldmans, but what about Nicoles Family? They do not care I tell you that much. They know no amount of Money in the world will stop the Killing of innocent people, and it for sure wont bring back Nicole...

Posted at 2:32PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Ms.Checker

62. I wouldn't be surprised if the Goldman's didn't set this up. Fred Goldman is a nasty, nasty man. I agree that a jury found OJ not guilty and the case is over and done with. First the Goldman's didn't want the book published and then they saw dollar signs and want it published. All the money in the world is not going to bring their son back. The bitterness and anger is going to destroy them. They need to move on with their life and quit obessing with OJ. They must have a shallow life to only worry about him and what he is doing. If he is guilty, he has to live with that, and will be punished by a higher power one of these days. If he wanted what belonged to him, he was entitled to it. Someone tipping him off was working for someone, and hopefully that will all come out in the trial. And no one likes Marcia Clark either and her comments only make her look bitter because she couldn't win the trial against OJ. She needs to get a life too. I say let the courts do their job and everyone needs to stand by their verdicts.

Posted at 2:07PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Barbara H

63. I am not going to get into if OJ did it or not but it is clear that OJ is acting like a child by fighting over football cards. I didn't do that since I was 10 and OJ is 60.

Posted at 2:47PM on Sep 20th 2007 by dude58677

64. What Joe doesn't seem to realize is that even if every item O.J. took was illegally stolen from him, you can't go about retrieving it the way O.J. did. If O.J. and his guys walked in and grabbed up all O.J.'s possessions and walked out, there would have been no crime. The fact that guns were used is a major legal issue. And even though he didn't have a gun himself, he is clearly in control of that situation, so he is culpable. Also, if O.J. or his thugs took one item (even a cell phone) that he's unable to reasonably prove is legally his, the whole event basically boils down to an armed robbery. We can take every O.J. item out of the equation and have an almost airtight case with a stolen cell phone (or non-O.J. collectible) and the taped confrontation. O.J. is screwed and he has it coming on this one.

Posted at 5:59PM on Sep 20th 2007 by CRH

65. YOU THINK YOU CAN STEAL MY $H!T?!

Posted at 7:40PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Steve

66. Once again Simpson takes the law into his own hands and meters out his own justice. Why should he be above the law? Since his peers taught him that he can get away with murder he now believes he can storm into a person's room and lay claim to their property. Those men legally purchased those items at an auction becasue Simpson stopped payment on the storage space ans SOP is to auction off the contents after a set period of time. True they may have flaunted these in front of Simpson, but then he should have used legal means, not street justice. You know what they say, you can take the thug out of the hood but...

Posted at 8:08PM on Sep 21st 2007 by And That's The Truth

67. oj simpson is an idiot and a fool. just face the facts. he put himself in this mess this time. there is no rational excuse for the way he conducted himself at that hotel. has the man lost his mind? perhaps???

Posted at 3:25AM on Sep 21st 2007 by JF

68. wow i listened to the vidio and im glad that he wasnt the suspect. whats real, he is the person what was violated he was taking back what was his. I also think that oj has had a lot of bad breaks i dont think he murdered his wife. because if he did how is a black man getting off for something as killing a white woman never happens its always reverse. my brother is innocent.

Posted at 2:29PM on Sep 21st 2007 by aj

69. u cant take the law into your own hands and expect to get away with it....especially if your name is OJ Simpson. Dummy!!

Posted at 5:02PM on Sep 21st 2007 by JF

70. For all you folks who love your self some 50 % p-diddy ,ludicrous . I find it funny that when O.J. shows you how "its done for real " you are so mad! You peole are confused. You go to aconcert and listen to buffons like 50 % say he odues this stuff and you cheer him, but yet O.J. is doing this stuff for real and ytou are mad. What a confused generation!!!

Posted at 5:31PM on Sep 21st 2007 by Viewsonic

71. I don't remember... When was the big news story when this stuff was "stolen" from OJ?

Posted at 10:45PM on Sep 21st 2007 by Evel Duck

72. it was nice of OJ to go get that stuff for the Goldmans.

Posted at 12:44PM on Oct 10th 2007 by elvis

73. I UNDERSTAND WHY OJ WANTED HIS THINGS BACK,BECAUSE SO HE CAN GIVE THEM TO HIS OWN KIDS SOMEDAY IT MEANT A LOT TO HIM .I'AM NOT STANDING UP FOR HIM,BUT I THINK THIS TIME WAS A SIT UP LOOK AT THE GUY TOM THAT HAD THE VIDEO TAPE AND ALSO ON CNN TALKING ABOUT HOW IT ALL WENT DOWN IN THE HOTEL ROOM.I WONDER HOW MUCH HE MADE OFF THE STORY ALREADY THAT GUY SHOULD OF GONE TO JAIL BY NOW WITH THE OTHERS.".HE SOON WILL WHEN THE TRUTH EVER COMES OUT THATS WHAT I THINK"TOM ALSO HAS BEEN IN TROUBLE WITH THE LAW.I ALSO HEARD THAT ON CNN.WITH LARRY KING LIVE.

Posted at 2:35PM on Sep 22nd 2007 by Ella

74. If these items were stolen from OJ, then why were the police not contacted? OJ is not above the law. At the very least, if someone stole items one would want them prosecuted, and initially have a restraining order placed on these individuals so they wouldnt attempt to steal again. OJ went in there under the guise of buying these items back- that is clear indication that they no longer belonged to him.
If the items were owned by someone else, then there should exist proof of purchase- date and how much paid. How's OJ gonna get around that one?

Posted at 10:29AM on Sep 22nd 2007 by Samantha

75. In my opinion, it's a set up. I'm not sure what really went down but from the tapes that were released earlier of 5 minutes are so, I can't see it any other way. Everyone keep talking about why O.J. want go somewhere and sit down. Why should he? He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Either way this guy who taped the mess was in it for the money and the controversary around O.J. regarding that book release. Why at the same time everyone is talking about this book, this meeting was set up. INTERESTING!! I'm sorry for the pass year that O.J. was acquitted but society need to move on. Whether he did that crime or not, we are keeping ourselves indulge in this man's life for what. There has been too many lives around the world that was more tragic and should receive better attention than the Goldman's or Brown's. They are continuously trying to keep this country in rememberance of their family lost and found another reason to try and get this man. Let's move on. I say don't give the media your time when they start with the o.J. stuff. It's all making a dollar for someones pocket. He think he was guilty several years ago but this one here just seem like a cruel set-up and he should truly be exonerated from these charges. This Riccio guy really gave some thought to this situation.

Posted at 8:43PM on Sep 23rd 2007 by browneyes

Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.