Star Catcher
Mary Louise Parker's New Baby Girl

"Weeds" star Mary Louise Parker was snapped on Thursday holding the latest accessory to sweep Hollywood -- a Third World baby! Adorable!

The lovely duo were attached at the hip, as MLP chatted on her cell phone after taking the little one to a doctor in New York.

Mary Louise already has a 3-year-old son from a previous relationship with loser actor Billy Crudup.

Tags: mary Louise parker, MaryLouiseParker

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 9) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. TMZ...You might be making news, but you're at the same time mocking third world babies. Don't refer to them as "accessories". If Stars are willing to make their lives better, than you should applaud them for it. Plenty of Stars have adopted children from "richer countries", but you've never made a big deal out of it...

Posted at 5:55PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Manuela Kay-Arden

32. Seriously, get over it. For one thing...if you're were an african mother or father you'd be singing a different tune. Proverty people all cultures have it...and if these stars want to adopt an african, chinese, or whatever let them. Making a difference is what counts.

Also #12- I think you have it wrong. What # 9 said was right on...you must mean #8. That's the sorry S.O.B.

Posted at 1:24PM on Sep 21st 2007 by queen_godess82276

33. I really resent the glib way that you people trivialize African adoptions. Funny, no one seemed to mind or find commentary necessary when thousands of Americans adopted Chinese baby----didn't seem worthy of comment. Interesting, the disparity.....

Posted at 6:20PM on Sep 20th 2007 by dandy

34. What is wrong with american babies ? Could it be that they can't get their names in the press? because it isn't the IN THING to do.

Shame on You ALL................

Posted at 7:51PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Ben Johnston

35. Oh great just what we need another Hollywood kid that will grow up with an iphone, porsche and oh yeah an identity crisis. She's just another idiot Hollywoodite.

Posted at 6:14PM on Sep 20th 2007 by cocopuff56

36. 42 POSER
Can't you just admit that the BABY IS UGLY.
I don't see how race, or anything else needs to come into it.
THE BABY IS UGLY - GET OVER IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 6:17PM on Sep 20th 2007 by THAT BABY IS UGLY

37. Why would you consider Billy Crudup a loser? He's a talented actor. Makes no sense.

TS

Posted at 7:07PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Thomas

38. Hey #47 sit down before you hurt yourself. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion even if you don't like it. So lighten up and enjoy the blog.

Posted at 6:24PM on Sep 20th 2007 by cocopuff56

39. I think that the Ugliest adopted celebrity child is Madonna's son David. I am sorry but that poor baby (David) is totaly UGLY.

Posted at 6:27PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Love Life

40. So this is for TMZ staff....There is no "3rd world". They are called "developing countries" now. I realize this doesn't make for as clever a tag line but you look really uninformed about current terminology.

Posted at 11:48AM on Sep 21st 2007 by Jenniferjk

41. I never before this story thought that TMZ was racist or had racist views but I think I was wrong. Their racism makes me sad and all of your racism makes me sad, too. It's just really depressing.

Posted at 6:35PM on Sep 20th 2007 by Racism Makes Me Sad

42. Why do they only adopt African children? Why don't they adopt Mexican children?

Posted at 6:40PM on Sep 20th 2007 by why?

43. Hey, Pitiful,

An orphan anywhere is a child without parents. It doesn't matter where the child comes from. It doesn't matter where you adopt from, it doesn't matter where Oprah opens a school, or who you donate your money to. It just matters that you do. Please back up why we should only adopt from our "culture", which by the way, happens to come from pretty much everywhere, BUT here. But mostly, please tell me why that child deserves any less chance in life than a child here. Do explain.

Posted at 6:44PM on Sep 20th 2007 by rachel

44. I am all for adoption. Being able and wanting to adopt is great. And that's adoption of any child.

Maybe celebrities (people with money/assets) are choosing to adopt children from other countries not because of any lengthy process in the US but to avoid any problems with natural parents at a later date. I would think It's much harder for a birth parent in a foreign country with no assets to try to make any claims for their child or money from a celebrity. Madonna seems to be the exception.

Why is it that Brad and Angelina are now the "spokespersons" for adoption? Celebrities (and non) have been adopting for years. Josephine Baker, Harpo Marx, Cecil B. Demille, and Eve Arden are just a few famous folks who adopted children before it became, what it seems to be, fashionable. Other celebes who adopted include Kirstie Alley, Mia Farrow, Michelle Pfeiffer, even Kirk Cameron have adopted children. But it seems the only folks who will take credit, as it they started a movement is Brad and Angelina. Give me a break!

Hopefully both mom, baby and son are happy!

Posted at 6:43PM on Sep 20th 2007 by nica

45. Alot of posts are not making sense. Please, TMZ, stop deleting peoples posts.

Posted at 6:53PM on Sep 20th 2007 by hello, it\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments