Camilla Parker-Bowles Lives!

16. Are you kidding? Who couldn't tell which was the real one? She should look so good. Diana was right, she does look like a rotweiler

Posted at 4:20PM on Sep 26th 2007 by American

17. this has nothing to do with the poor Diana its had to do with which picture - GET OVER THE DIANA CRAP - SHE ALSO HAD SEVERAL AFFAIRS BEFORE HER HUSBAND AND SHE USED THE PRESS AND PEOPLE TO HER BENEFIT - WAKE UP!!!! AND GET OVER IT -

Posted at 4:18PM on Sep 26th 2007 by sandy

18. She looks exactly like my former brother -in - laws new wife. gag me.....................

Posted at 4:18PM on Sep 26th 2007 by anonymous

19. The One Made Of Wax Does Look Better...Lol.

Posted at 4:36PM on Sep 26th 2007 by Katherine

20. The Wax One Looks So Real!

Posted at 4:36PM on Sep 26th 2007 by Katherine

21. UGLY, UGLY, UHHGLY!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 7:42PM on Sep 26th 2007 by rollinontheriver

22. Now I'm confused. Is it Mortician wax, "Morticia" Wax, or Turtle Wax?

Posted at 5:16PM on Sep 26th 2007 by Harry Nipples, Jr.

23. OH, DEAR! Camilla must be wondering what we're all talking about, which is proof that if you live with a face long enough, you'll begin to like it! Just think: one of these days, Charles and Camilla may be King and Queen of England! We'll be able to buy their pretty faces on coins and mugs and you-name-it.

Saints preserve us! If we're lucky, we'll get Wills and Kate, a young couple who really seem to be in love.

So, Camilla is in wax. STICK A WICK IN HER, AND LIGHT HER UP, MATES! AND YOU KNOW WHERE TO STICK THE WICK! Yessiree! The next time I'm in London, I expect Madam Toussaud's to pay ME to look at her! No way would I visit that silly museum (which I've already seen) simply to view The Horse! *whinny*

NOTE TO CHARLES: Get glasses. On second thought, don't. You're better off not seeing what's lying in that bed with you.

Posted at 9:14PM on Sep 26th 2007 by AGHAST

24. I agree with #14

Posted at 5:58PM on Sep 26th 2007 by DW

25. What a horrible and ugly women. She has no class at all. Her being with Charles hurts England because the world has no respect for her. World leaders must be respected to rule successfully.

Posted at 7:08PM on Oct 2nd 2007 by Connie

26. Yeah, the wax looks better then the real witch. But then again, most English women are UGLY, even Princess Diana was NO BEAUTY. Yes, she was elegant & classy but NO BEAUTY.
Camilla had the most horrible teeth a person could have. I never understood what Charles saw in her. Yeah, he's ugly TOO!!

Posted at 6:59PM on Sep 26th 2007 by thats right

27. She may be ugly, but she has more substance than Diana had. Even she admitted she was dumb.

Posted at 8:10AM on Sep 27th 2007 by maree

28. Looking at the wax figure and the real Camilla, all I can think is THANK GOD she's not the mother of William and Harry. Can you imagine what the combination of traits woujld have looked like? Bad...

Posted at 7:40PM on Sep 26th 2007 by keri

29. How sad is it that the wax one looks better!!, What a dried up old bag!
Remember when Charles said on those recorded phone calls that he wished he was a tampon in her!!!!!!!!! EEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Diana was too good for the royal family at least Thank God William and Harry got their mother's good looks and personality.
EEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Can you imagine what she looks like without makeup?????
EEEEEEEEEEEEE EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Posted at 2:27PM on Sep 27th 2007 by Camilla's a hag!

30. Wax or no wax, she is one ugly horse. Charles is also so guess they should be together. Diana never should have gotten into that mess.

Posted at 10:00PM on Sep 26th 2007 by Nanny