Britney Blows Off Court

16. THERE IS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH HER. DO NOT GIVE HER THE CHILDREN. THESE POOR LITTLE BOYS ARE GOING TO BE SO SCREWED IN THE HEAD IF THEY SURVIVE BRITNEY AS A MOTHER.

Posted at 1:24AM on Oct 22nd 2007 by BRITNEY IS A DANGER TO HER CHILDREN

17. what a way to win over the court

Posted at 12:20PM on Oct 11th 2007 by hora

18. And who is suprised she didn't show up???????

Posted at 12:22PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Me

19. stupid bitch doesn't deserve kids!

Posted at 11:11AM on Oct 12th 2007 by Angel

20. even if my presence wasn't necessary

you wouldn't be able to keep me away if it concerned my children!

too bad she doesn't think the same way--

it would show the courts that she was serious about being a good mom

Posted at 12:21PM on Oct 11th 2007 by sally

21. WOW what a loser, I have two kids and I would be camped out of the courrt room if I were her. Does she know what is in store for her, the courts don't play around, she is really STUPID! I hope she doesn't get those kids back she is gonna end up hurting them, such a waste BRIT WHY?????? WHAT A SHAME, WHAT A SHAME!!!!!!!

Posted at 4:47PM on Oct 14th 2007 by IN SHAME

22. She is not required to attend, so this should not affect the outcome. Anyways include the whole story TMZ and stop misleading the public.

"Since her appearance was not required, her no-show status shouldn't damage her appeal for overnight visits"

Posted at 12:21PM on Oct 11th 2007 by include the rest of the story TMZ!

23. She should be kept from her sons for ONE FULL YEAR. Teminate custody ASAP. And let the paps have her sick, warped, non-talented, pimpled ass.

Posted at 12:27PM on Oct 11th 2007 by stephanie

24. It is so obivous that she does not want those kids. I feel so sorry for them. People like her piss me off. Here she is with with two beautiful children and could care less about them, then someone like myself who wants nothing more than to be a mommy and can't. She is so pathetic!

Posted at 12:24PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Sabrina

25. Doesn't matter if she's there or not...she's not getting what she wants

Posted at 12:23PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Nuff said

26. Even if she wasn't "required" to attend, she was urged to attend by her lawyer. Wouldn't her lawyer know best in this situation? What kind of message does that send to the court? She wants to change the custody arrangement but doesn't want to show up at court? I really don't get it.

Posted at 12:24PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Susannah

27.


True, her appearance wasn't requred today;

Her opportunity to raise two children is no longer required, either.

Posted at 12:25PM on Oct 11th 2007 by J

28. LET ME SEE K-FED LEFT HER, HER ASST. LEFT, MGR.'S, LAWYERS,HER COUSIN,....ALL GONE NOW... WHERE'S HER POTTY MOUTH SISTER...
IT'S FUNNY HOW THE PAPS HOLD HER ARM FOR HER NOW AND GUIDE HER AROUND LIKE HER ASST. USED TO.....PRETY SOON SHE WILL HAVE A BUM ON THE STREET HELPING HER...LOL

Posted at 12:24PM on Oct 11th 2007 by BRITTNAY IS A JOKKKEEE

29. She doesnt reeeeaaallly want those kids back. She's just doing this because it's what everyone expects her to do. She knows that by not showing up, the judge will be pissed, and she can continue her Frapp, Mickey'D, Taco Bell, posing for the paps paarrrrtaaaayyy. Trick bitch.

Posted at 12:25PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Saving Silverman

30. This piece of trash does not deserve anyones sympathy. If those little boys weren't important enough to keep her nasty a** home or get up early enough to get to the court house she does not deserve them. So unfit everything.

Posted at 12:29PM on Oct 11th 2007 by Dontclaimtobeperfect