Anna Nicole's Doc Challenges Search Warrants

61. I am sure It is Howard instructing here to fight the warrants
another obstruction of Justice

Posted at 10:30PM on Oct 17th 2007 by Sue

62. It doesn't take a CSI team to know that Anna Nicole Smith and her son were both murdered within days of each other. These were not casual overdoses.

Posted at 10:37PM on Oct 17th 2007 by Chuck P.

63. Howie tactics..............Diversion.............distraction..............Delay.............and destroy credibility.

Posted at 2:00PM on Oct 19th 2007 by forgot credibility

64. what else can they search,

How about HKS's apartment, LB house, his apartment if he is still renting it, the storage space where HKS put ANS's things, his parent's home and office? Well there must be others but that will do for now.

Posted at 10:45PM on Oct 17th 2007 by Justice denied?

65. Justice Denied, I believe Larry's house has already been searched.
Reported by Fox News, and Geraldo Friday, Saturday. It was searched same time doctor's house seached appx. 6:30 A.M.

Posted at 10:57PM on Oct 17th 2007 by WHOA!!!

66.
HERE's one for ya !

HOW MUCH DID ALL THE PRESCRIPTIONS ANNA HAD IN HER SYSTEM COST ?


THIS STORY IS REMINDING ME OF THE STORY :


ALI BABA AND the FORTY THIEVES !

Posted at 10:58PM on Oct 17th 2007 by helen_on_earth

67. After Reading this quote from the Mercury News link on this thread...

"After a medical professional's office is searched, a special master appointed by the court reviews the items and helps ensure authorities didn't seize materials, privileged or otherwise, not covered by the warrant. The doctors' attorneys will have the opportunity to challenge the seizure of these items. "

...I did some reading on Doctor/Patient Privilege...to little ole me, this SEEMS to be in place to protect the Patient NOT the Doctor...
"
"Once a bona-fide doctor-patient relationship is established, the duty of confidentiality"attaches," and in many states, the doctor can invoke a legal privilege, on the patient's behalf, when asked to disclose or divulge information the doctor may have or know about the patient."

http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-e...onfidentiality

CALIFORNIA: California's legal privilege expressly includes psychotherapists and psychiatrists (Section 1010 of Evidence Rules). Patients must expressly waive doctor-patient confidentiality when they become plaintiffs in civil lawsuits (Section 1016 of Evidence Rules). Doctors may withhold certain mental health records from patients if disclosure would have an adverse effect on patient. (H&S Section 1795.12 and.14).

Another something interesting...imo...

"The attorney-client privilege, perhaps the most important of traditional privileges, can be negated if a court determines that an attorney-client communication has been used to further a crime."

http://judiciary.senate.gov/testimon...70&wit_id=5754

SO, I would surmise, they will try the "OVERLY BROAD" argument...ANYONE have further info or thoughts on this?

Posted at 11:05PM on Oct 17th 2007 by uuuhhooohh!!!

68. http://origin.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_7205492

Posted at 11:06PM on Oct 17th 2007 by uuuhhooohh!!!

69. 1st. It's impossible for doctors who see hundreds, perhaps thousands of people on a regular basis to be certain wether or not an individual is "drug-seeking" or actually has a valid need for scheduled & government controlled meds.
2nd. Going after reputable doctors who regularly have these tough decisions to make, and threatening to demonize & strip them of their ability to practice valid medicine is a tragedy all it's own!
3rd. Being an American Military Veteran suffering from a chronic condition which requires such medicines in order to get through some of the ugliest-brainseering-blood boiling-disabling & wickedly painful days and managing to maintain a positive outlook on life, I've come to understand the uses of the same drugs I, myself, once demonized as a soldier and a younger man.
4th. Since it's unclear what A.N.S. was suffering from to be certain, we may never know the truth.

AND

5th. If the courts of law & our government make it any harder for common joes such as myself who have no history nor want and need for drug missuse or abuse... what's next??

FINALLY, I'm not saying that Anna beneffited from constantly being medicated. I AM SAYING, going after doctors who are genuinely attempting to help sends only one somber message. And it's not a good one.

Posted at 12:07AM on Oct 30th 2007 by GUARDIAN OF THE AIRWAVES

70. ANNA NICOLE...FINAL 24...BIO Channel at 11:00pm....TUNE IN!!!!!!

Posted at 11:15PM on Oct 17th 2007 by uuuhhooohh!!!

71. She killed Anna. She knew Anna was abusing those drugs and she continued to prescribe them. Most doctors monitor the drugs they give their patients, I know mine do. Hell, he only give me so much of a particular drug....and gives me a hard time about renewing it....This doctor was unethical and kept prescribing knowing the state she was in and she was abusing the very drugs she was prescribing. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. I still think she and Howard are in on it.

Revoke it friggin license....

Posted at 7:34PM on Oct 18th 2007 by sarah

72.

Howard & Co. is FINALLY going to Pay for what he put Virgie thru.

Larry's also going to know what it's like to have his child taken away from him.

And hopefully they will BOTH, along with a few others, live happily ever after

in a COLD, DAMP Jail Cell for the Deaths of Daniel and his mother.

We will all be Singing Hallaluyah !!!

Rejoicing, we will do.

Amen!

Posted at 11:27PM on Oct 17th 2007 by tweety

73. You people who speak about the departed so coldly and with such vulgarity will earn your penance in hell.

Anna was an addict and I do think the doctor should be held responsible but to blame Howard is ridiculous. He is not a doctor and did what many attorneys do for their clients daily in Hollywood. You people still want to crucify this man and it makes me sick.

Posted at 12:12AM on Oct 18th 2007 by MyOpinion

74. Can someone please post a link to where it says LB's house was searched? I have tried to find it and can't. I don't know how to locate a transcript on Fox. If someone would care to instruct, would appreciate it.

Posted at 11:47PM on Oct 17th 2007 by Justice denied?

75. uuuhhhooohh!!!

don't get BIO channel. would appreciate a summary at your convenience.

Posted at 11:50PM on Oct 17th 2007 by Justice denied?