Hottest Videos -- Week of 11/4

16. Why is she always in that chandelier shop 2 or 3 times a week? Is that where she is getting her dope?

Posted at 6:34AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Nancy

17. I wonder what Britney will do when she is no longer the object of desire? I mean, the public will always be interested in her, but not to this extent. All it will take is some new, young, hot star to come on the scene and Britney will be an old story. I doubt she will handle it well at all, because then she will only be left with the mess she made of her life. Sad.

Posted at 6:41AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Me

18. K-Fed would be much better for the children to be with. Get it over with already take the kids before she kills them.She is such A nut case no one in her shape needs children.WTF is wrong with the judge is he sleeping with her?

Posted at 6:46AM on Nov 10th 2007 by medicswife

19. 17 - How many different times has she been to the store? were you there? does it matter? her life her choice !

18 - she will always be an obect of desire, she has two children and will always be their mother.

19 - medicswife, how can you give a diagnosi when you have not seen this patient that you call a nut case. Being a medics wife I do believe this would be called malpractice!

Posted at 7:02AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Just a MOM

20. My goodness you make it sound like she abandoned her kids. She went in a store for a few minutes. Some of these storie get blown way out of proportion! And yes if I was her and had to pay for these babysitting services the court has ordered for me I would use them for babysitters too.

Posted at 7:24AM on Nov 10th 2007 by LuvBritney

21. I feel sorry for her. The paparazzi don't let up at all ! Just think how f__ked upped you would be if it was like this every time you went out. JUST LEAVE HER ALONE AND LET HER TRY AND BE A MOTHER TO THESE KIDS.

Posted at 8:23AM on Nov 10th 2007 by msalas67@satx.rr.com

22. The hottest videos are on nudistconnect.com. lol

Posted at 10:42AM on Nov 12th 2007 by maggie

23. #19 I think you have it wrong.....I think the judge is sleeping with Gay/Fed. How else can you explain all of the very one sided decisions he has ruled on? There is no way he is looking at the facts, he is just being persuaded by the media and public. She has had rulings against her that no other person has had to deal with, why you ask? Becaise she has money. That's what it all boils down to. She has the ability to make money and have nice things, something Gay/Fed can not do, you know like get a job. People are just jealous of her success and wish they were in her shoes.

Posted at 7:54AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Brit4Ever

24. TMZ fans the flames and some readers gather closer to get burned by the fire's heat. The court appointed monitor is charged with the following duty -- if anything of concern happens during a visit with the children, that visitation may be ended immediately. We weren't there. The monitor was there. In her judgment there was apparently no reason to end either visitation. Had there been, we can be sure, TMZ would have reported that in giant headlines. For some reason TMZ seems determined to report on Spears with a bias that is blatant; TMZ's producer is rumored to be a personal friend of Federline's attorney. There aren't any laws against this but it doesn't seem remotely like good journalism or good news practice.

Posted at 7:55AM on Nov 10th 2007 by wendy

25. STOP DEFENDING HER! It really makes me sick to hear people say that she could have a good Nanny and she is a Star and under a microscope. WHY DO YOU NEED A NANNY WHEN YOU SEE YOUR KIDS 1 or 2 days a WEEK! Thats NOT a parent!!! If she wants to be left alone she could move, or stay in the house and play with the kids like NORMAL parents would do. She cant spend her 1 day with her kids away from the media. SHES A MEDIA ADDICT! She is a MOTHER biologically, NOT a MOM!

Posted at 8:06AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Star

26. It seems to me that she could have gone chandelier shopping on one of the FIVE days that she does NOT have her kids. She is showing very poor judgement in the way she is spending the very little time she has with her kids. As far as leaving the kids in the car, if it was a spur of the moment decision to stop by the chandelier store, if I had someone with me, like a friend, sister, or mom, I would probably ask them to watch the kids for a minute or two also (can you imagine taking two toddlers into a chandelier store???), but asking a court appointed monitor is totally different. That's like holding up a sign saying 'Yes I WANT you to say bad things about me to the judge, I WANT to appear as if I don't give a rat's ass about my kids', etc. I think Britney is a little bit too far gone to ever be considered stable enough for those kids. They are definitely better off with K-Fed.

Posted at 8:37AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Stacy

27. I don't think her sons are the kind of attention Britney craves, otherwise she would be a real mother to them instead of finding ways to make the paps take her picture all day.

Posted at 8:34AM on Nov 10th 2007 by Me

28. This is what I don'd understand, how can a mother put there children through this.
Look people, no sane mother would allow there children to be subjected to this. Britney is in this situation due to her irresponsible behavior, drug addiction, and starving for attention to be notice by the public. I know personally that if I was in her shoes that I would not give the pap's a chance to put myself or my children through this spectacle which obviously shows she wants the attention. Court appoiinted coaches are not BABYSITTERS, simple as that. There purpose is to monitor the visitaion, and nothing less, hence the term, supervised visitation. She has no one to blame but herself. Though the pap's are harsh, it is something she does not have to put her children through, as for herself thats her business, but as a mother she should have enough sense to not show her blatant disregard for the safety of her children. The court appointed coach is not to be trusted, would you leave your children with a stranger. I know I wouldnt, whether she works for the state or not. I would also not put my complete ignorance of child rearing on display either, not just to the public but to the very person she is supposed to be showing that she is a responsible adult, and mother. Get a grip people, nannies are not the way to raise your child.

Posted at 8:43AM on Nov 10th 2007 by helllooo

29. What will it take for Child Protective Services to take those kids away from her?

Posted at 8:54AM on Nov 10th 2007 by ???

30. i think the reporter should leave briney,s kids alone as that is the reason why she didnèt take the kids out becasue of the repoter.as the reporter being on their ass and it pretty bad that the reporter should be charge for bugging brittney and it not her fault the she ran over people feet if they would get the hell out the way then it, would be a prombelm!

Posted at 10:13AM on Nov 10th 2007 by marcy