Home : Celebrity Justice : Stripper Hits De La Hoya with $100 Million Suit

Stripper Hits De La Hoya with $100 Million Suit

Posted Nov 15th 2007 7:40PM by TMZ Staff

The stripper who first claimed she had racy snaps of sexy boxer Oscar De La Hoya wearing lingerie -- then quickly recanted on national TV -- threw a haymaker today at the Golden Boy, suing him for $100 million for smearing her rep.

"Model" Milana Dravnel alleges in the suit, filed today in Manhattan Supreme Court, that De La Hoya's people coerced her into taking back her story -- you know, the one where she allegedly took those saucy pictures of Oscar in fishnet stockings and more in a Philly hotel room -- and made false promises to her if she recanted.

Dravnel also claims she was the champ's mistress from January 2006 to May 2007, and that she was paid $70,000 by photo agency X17 for the pictures, a price her lawyer says was "below market." She's now suing for "fraud, defamation, and infliction of emotional distress."

There was no response from De La Hoya's corner.

Tags: Oscar de la Hoya, OscarDeLaHoya

Comments [100]

SHARE |

Email 4ie6

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 7) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. I'd love to see those pics of his sexy ass

Posted at 10:51PM on Nov 15th 2007 by normanfidel

47. Regarding post #30 from HL: "He never beat a real Champion, did he?" Do the names Hopkins, Sturm, Vargas & Trinidad mean anything to you?

Check your facts before making a statement!

Posted at 11:00PM on Nov 15th 2007 by HRP

48. If joe Namath can wear stockings whats the big deal.

Posted at 10:57PM on Nov 15th 2007 by shakira

49. 'Defimation (sp?) of character!?! PLEASE!!!! WHO defamed WHO'S charachter, slut!?!

Posted at 11:22PM on Nov 15th 2007 by Max

50. IF there is a ridiculously large 'out of court' settlement, the bitch WON, Oscar! Don't let her do it!

Posted at 11:25PM on Nov 15th 2007 by Max

51. Get a job, golddigger, instead of trying to mooch off of those with the bad luck to have crossed paths with you.

Posted at 11:25PM on Nov 15th 2007 by Ms_Tell_It_Like_It_Is

52. First she takes $$ for the pix, then was "coerced" (got $$ ) to recant the story. Now she's suing him for $1M. Trifecta!! BTW She said in interviews on TV they never had sex!!! Now she says she was his "mistress" for 18 months. Hardly the most believable person around. I noticed that she just smirked thru the whole interview I saw when the pix came out, was totally unconvincing in her manner, and you could tell she was enjoying being in the spotlite---guess she wants more $$ and attention. Funny, she's a beautiful girl (reminds me of the young Victoria Principal)and probably could have made tons of legitimate $$ based on her looks. Easier to scam people tho.

Posted at 11:34PM on Nov 15th 2007 by bogie

53. I love it!! Now that she has some $$, de la hoya should sue HER for defamation. It seems to me that she's completely got it wrong. Besides, weren't they photoshopped???

Posted at 12:21AM on Nov 16th 2007 by dogandponybot

54.

SLUT SLUT SLUT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CALL GIRL, THAT NEEDS THE $$ FOR HER METH

ADDICTION ~!!!!!!!!! WHAT AN EMBARRASSMENT

TO HER FAMILY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HA HA HA LOSER !!!

GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND GET YOUR G E D.

THEN MAYBE YOU CAN GET A REAL JOB !!!!!!!!!

" YOU WHORE "

Posted at 12:48AM on Nov 16th 2007 by MILLIE FAN !!!!!!!!!!!!

55. HA - nice - www.porkchopfactory.com

Posted at 1:25AM on Nov 16th 2007 by porkchop factory

56. She thinks he has tarnished her reputation? Her reputation is that she takes her clothes off for money ! Other than porn, that is as low as you can GO! It would be hard for him to tarnish her rep more than she already has! Duh!

Posted at 1:51AM on Nov 16th 2007 by rj

57. Are whores allowed to sue in that state?? I wonder if the IRS would question how much of the $$$$ her clients stuff in her crotch she actually claims as income??

Posted at 1:56AM on Nov 16th 2007 by rudewaitress

58. Ding dang y'all it's Britney Spears. I just got this to say: she is the one that inflicted distress on herself and her reputation when she decided to go public with private pictures. If she claims she took cash and bribes then she is admitting to extortion. Oh y'all my head is just pounding like a hammer I think I done too much thinking. Ima take some crack....I mean provi...whatever the hell medication I am claiming to be on. Love y'all....don't forget to buy my new album so my two kids Samson and Jacob could go to college.

Posted at 2:05AM on Nov 16th 2007 by Britney Spears

59. JR - LOL
No kidding. Smear campaign? Huh ... The only smear campaign she needs to worry about is her anual Pap. So the magic number now days is $100Million? Get real. The gold digging wh*re would have to spread em continuously for the rest of her life to even see a fraction of 1% of that money from her career. The irony is that is seems that it is De La Hoya who should sue her for emotional distress.

Posted at 2:13AM on Nov 16th 2007 by Erica

60. Excuse me: Keep these things in perspective. A friend of mine who has business dealings with O in the Los Angeles area, confided to me that O was bi-sexual way back in 2002. That is way before the picture this year. I know an even suacier story about O. I am thinking about keeping my secret for a while to see how her case pans out. Then, I will out my proof -- make myself some $$$$ by selling mine to one of the tabloids.

Be fair - both she and he are whores.

Posted at 2:09AM on Nov 16th 2007 by AM

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments