Mad Mel

121. Why do Mel and his son looked stressed? Maybe because they know there are cameras fixed on them waiting to get a negative shot. I bet the cameras got 100 normal-looking shots before they got one where both Mel and his son looked less than thrilled.

Posted at 2:54AM on Nov 21st 2007 by Let it go

122. wow. this picture makes me very sad for him.. as a human being.. he just looks sad.

Posted at 11:54AM on Nov 21st 2007 by wow

123. mel looks great, he's a humble and talented guy

Posted at 6:06PM on Nov 21st 2007 by annie

124. three cheers for mel and happy thanksgiving
hope peace and love

Posted at 9:07PM on Nov 21st 2007 by limael

125. People have no class. Mel apologized well over a YEAR ago, and you're still mad at him??? GET OVER IT and GET A LIFE.

Posted at 6:49PM on Nov 24th 2007 by LiberalsSuck

126. You BET they are jealous of him... Why else do they insist on holding a grudge?? and not ONLY because he is filthy stinking RICHER than they will EVER be, but also because they really hate and envy Christians. If he wasn't a Christian and a conservative one at that, they would have forgotten about it a LONG time ago. The only religion that is fair game to bash in this country, is Christianity... and if you're conservative?? OH BOY!!!

Posted at 12:14AM on Dec 24th 2007 by LiberalsSuck

127. he looks like a bitter old man ....

Posted at 3:23AM on Dec 2nd 2007 by fmita

128. Looks like Big Mike is also an ignorant bigot. His ignorance is evident in the fact that he does not know that Jews are also white. I am sure he scared many folks with the threat to spit in their face... That sounds real manly. Maybe his real name should be "Tiny Mike."

Posted at 1:18AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by fmita

129. Mels apology was a lie and you have all been suckered into it. He was not sorry for what he said, he was sorry for getting caught - for being exposed as the bigot he is. When he made his fabricated movie, he claimed that he and his family were not bigots. Then, in a drunken, vomitous rage, he removed all doubt of his bigotry AND showed the world his true colors. Don't get sucked into believing his lies.

Posted at 5:59PM on Dec 2nd 2007 by fmita

130. a little white makeup and a red nose and he would look like one of those sad clown paintings

Posted at 9:58PM on Dec 3rd 2007 by fmita

131. i wonder if he just saw j.l.h. in her bikini...

Posted at 11:59PM on Dec 4th 2007 by scarred for life

132. I love Mel Gibson. I think it's so sad that people are so hateful. I'm sure Mel can handle this but subjecting his son to this form of hate is dispicable. He looks like a nice kid to me. I truely believe that the devil (and yes there is a devil as proven by the hatefulness in some of these comments) was upset with the popularity of Mel's movie on the Passion of the Christ. Christians are taught to be forgiving, Christ taught that on the crosss. I'm a Catholic Christians and I have never heard a mean word about another religion from the pulpit. It was our sins that crucified our Lord, not the Romans, not the Jews. I love Jews, my Lord was a Jew. The Catholic faith has Jewish roots. If people (especially Catholics) hate the Jews, it's due to ignorance. God gave us a free will so it's up to you if you want to accept Him or not.

Posted at 10:08AM on Dec 10th 2007 by mat

133. apaparently mat never heard of the crusades...

Posted at 12:04AM on Dec 19th 2007 by cheese pizza

134. Cheeze Pizza, I definitely have heard of the crusuades. What does that have to do with it. Back then we were rather barbaric period. But here is some info to help you.

Crusades
Question from on 01-29-2007:
Hello sir, I would like to ask a question about the crusades. If the (Pope) is infallibe, how could such wars have gone on? I have tried everything to explain this to myself, and I have even tried to accept them as a legitimate and holy war, of course, I prefer not to.

Answer:
The Pope is infallible only when he teaches something officially in the realm of faith and morals. In other matters he is fallible. That does not mean that the Pope was always wrong in blessing the crusaders because the historical fact is that the Muslims almost wiped out western Europe because it was Christian, a feat the accomplished in North Africa, in Palestine and in Asia Minor, which were formerly all Christian. So what is wrong with self defense. Up until the sixteenth century the Muslim Turks were a great threat to Europe. If it were not for the Pope uniting the Christian Kings and Princes, Europe would be part of Turkey today. These are plain historical facts.

Posted at 9:00AM on Dec 20th 2007 by mat

135. Mat is either igorant or selective regarding historical facts. He has G W Bush-like beliefs that it is ok to wipe out people of a specific ethnicity because a faction of that ethnicity is a threat. What a holier-than-thou outlook. He selectively justifies the crusades as self-defense, yet ignores the fact that atrocities, including widespread cannibalism, took place as in the Siege of Maarat in 1098 and Christian fury that was expressed in the massacres of Jews that accompanied the movement of the Crusader mobs through Europe during the first crusade. I bet you still believe that there were WMDs in Iraq.

Posted at 7:35PM on Dec 24th 2007 by Robert Zimmerman